Skip to main content

Diversification by Self-reinforcement of Preferences and Change of Interaction Type

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Network Theory and Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance
  • 850 Accesses

Abstract

There are situations where agents can benefit from coordinating their actions, i.e., agents gain payoffs by taking the same action as the others. Such situations can be modeled as coordination games. Other situations, i.e., agents gain payoffs by taking different actions, are modeled as complementary, asymmetric coordination, or minority games. In this study, we treat coordination and complementary games as types of interactions. Each agent can change the interaction type and faces binary choices. We examine the effects of decision errors on collective behavior and we show that a small decision error stabilizes collective behavior in a pure population of all agents who play either the coordination or complementary game. We also examine populations in which each agent can change the interaction type. We show that in a mixed population of agents who play either game, the behaviors and games become heterogeneous and the ratio of cooperative agents becomes 80% and the average utility is stable high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod R (1985) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Cohen MD (2001) Harnessing complexity. The free press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman B, Glance N (1993) Diversity and collective action. In: Haken H, Mikhailov A (eds) Interdisciplinary approaches to nonlinear complex systems (Springer Series in Synergetics). Springer, Berlin, pp 44–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwanaga S, Namatame A (2002) The complexity of collective decision. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci 6(2):137–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwanaga S, Namatame A (2003) Emergent division of labor and evaluation of its efficiency and equity. Int J Knowl-Based Intell Eng Syst 7(3):115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwanaga S, Namatame A (2017) Influence of partner selection on functional differentiation: emergence of diversity by isolated interaction and preference change. J Robot Netw Artif Life 3(4):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirman AP (1997) The economy as an interactive system. In: Arthur WB, Durlauf SN, Lane DA (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system II. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 491–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo M, Kakazu Y (1994) Evaluation of coordinated motions of multi-agent systems on competition for food between ant colonies [in Japanese]. IPSJ J 35(8):1555–1566

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak MA (2006) Evolutionary dynamics: exploring the equations of life. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds C (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model, computer graphics. In: Proceedings of the 14th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, SIGGRAPH’87, pp 25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein M, Cornejo A, Nagpal R (2014) Programmable self-assembly in a thousand-robot swarm. Science 345(6198):795–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandholm WH (2001) Preference evolution two-speed dynamics and rapid social change. Rev Econ Dyn 4(3):637–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (1978) Micromotives and macrobehavior. W W Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten R (1975) Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games. Int J Game Theory 4(1):25–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims K (1994) Evolved virtual creatures. In: Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on computer graphics and interactive, SIGGRAPH’94, pp 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzopoulos D, Tu X, Grzeszczuk R (1996) Artificial fishes: autonomous locomotion, perception, behavior, and learning in a simulated physical world. Artif Life 1(4):327–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saori Iwanaga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iwanaga, S., Kubo, M. (2019). Diversification by Self-reinforcement of Preferences and Change of Interaction Type. In: Chakrabarti, A., Pichl, L., Kaizoji, T. (eds) Network Theory and Agent-Based Modeling in Economics and Finance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8319-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics