Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Good Theory, Good Systems: An Instance of Accelerated Literacy Pedagogy Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians

Part of the book series: Language Policy ((LAPO,volume 19))

  • 1789 Accesses

Abstract

Accelerated Literacy pedagogy was implemented in many places in Australia in the 1990s and 2000s in remote Indigenous and other educationally disadvantaged school sites. The pedagogy has been evaluated many times, with mixed outcomes. Evaluation methodologies have varied widely, and student apparent growth data have proved difficult to collect. This chapter argues that a program so implemented in such varied contexts cannot be judged without due and separate regard to the theories that underpin the pedagogy and to the implementation processes in each context. The chapter offers the South Australian Accelerated Literacy Program (SAALP) as one example of an implementation site, managed by the author. After explaining the theoretical basis and intent of the pedagogy, I use criteria for effective implementation proposed by two McKinsey Reports and Fullan to analyse the implementation processes used in SAALP. I use NAPLAN effect size data for Reading and Writing, and Reading Comprehension growth data to demonstrate the effect of the program in mainstream South Australian schools across 3 years. The data show how the implementation strategies used in this context were able to show a sustained positive effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In South Australia, schools are categorised using an Index of Disadvantage, ranging from 1 (highest level of disadvantage) to 7 (lowest level of disadvantage.) The formula is similar to the national Index of Community Socio-Educational Advantage.

References

  • ACARA (2008). National Assessment Program, Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN). Melbourne: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. https://www.nap.edu.au/

  • ACER. (2003). Test of reading comprehension (TORCH). Melbourne: Australian Council of Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACER. (2011). SAALP Test of reading comprehension (TORCH) growth analysis. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACER. (2012). SAALP Test of reading comprehension (TORCH) growth analysis. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • ACER. (2013). SAALP Test of reading comprehension (TORCH) growth analysis. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • APA. (2000). Excellence in leadership in Indigenous education award. Sydney: Australian Principals’ Association Professional Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control No 4: The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R., & Hudson, J. (1997). Making the jump: a resource book for teachers of Aboriginal students. Broome: Catholic Education Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S., & Watson, R. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, R. (2002). It’s the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell, J., Underwood, C., & Withers, G. (2002). Evaluation of the scaffolding literacy program with Indigenous children in school. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7(3), 113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. Melbourne: CSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning. Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1984). Helping children to become language learners in the classroom. Darwin: Northern Territory Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1990). Natural language learning in aboriginal classrooms: Reflections on teaching and learning style for empowerment in English. In C. Walton & W. Eggington (Eds.), Language maintenance and education in Australian aboriginal contexts (pp. 105–139). Darwin: NTU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1998). Accessing the discourses of schooling. Dissertation, University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2007). Accelerating the literacy development of Indigenous students: The National Accelerated Literacy Program (NALP). Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2014a). The accelerated literacy program: Developmental outline. ALPAA. http://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/publications

  • Gray, B. (2014b). The Traeger Park project: Developmental outline. ALPAA. http://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/publications

  • Gray, B., & Cazden, C. B. (1992). Concentrated language encounters: International biography of a curriculum concept. Paper presented at the 26th annual TESOL Convention, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., & Cowey, W. (2001). University of Canberra accelerated literacy program: First report to the Northern Territory department of education and training. Melbourne: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., & Cowey, W. (2002). University of Canberra accelerated literacy program: Third report to the Northern Territory department of education and training. Canberra: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., Gray, P., & Cowey, W. (2002). University of Canberra accelerated literacy program: Second report to the Northern Territory department of education and training. Canberra: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B., Cowey, W., & Axford, B. (2003). Scaffolding literacy with Indigenous children in school. Final report to the Indigenous education branch, DETYA. Canberra: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. (2001). Scaffolding: Teaching and learning in the language and literacy classroom. Newtown: PETAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2005). Extending educational change. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, R. (2005). Semiotic mediation, language and society: Three exotropic theories – Vygotsky, Halliday and Bernstein. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), Language, society and consciousness: Ruqaiya Hasan. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (1992). Measuring the effects of school. Australian Journal of Education, 36(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. (1987). Watching children read and write. Victoria: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konza, D. (2010). Understanding the reading process. Adelaide: DECS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konza, D. (2011). Phonological awareness. Adelaide: DECS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, U. (1981). Model analysis of pedagogical processes, 2nd edn, Stockholm: CWK Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K. (2005). Childhood, lifehood and relatedness: Aboriginal ways of being, knowing and doing. In J. Phillips & J. Lampert (Eds.), Introductory Indigenous studies in education: The importance of knowing. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (2011). Bridging troubled waters: Interdisciplinarity and what makes it stick. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. R. (2013). Embedded literacy: Knowledge as meaning. Linguistics and Education, 24(1), 23–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2013). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mourshed, M., Chikioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. McKinsey Report. McKinsey & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • NALP. (2008a). AL teaching sequence. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • NALP. (2008b). Practitioner guide: Lesson observation and classroom support. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • NALP. (2008c). Questioning techniques. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, T. (1984). The process of reading: An introduction to theory and practice in the teaching of reading. Cammeray: Martin Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRP. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Rockville: NRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, B. (1999). Deadly readin’ writin’ and talkin’ project annual report: We’re on to something. Adelaide: Salisbury North R-7 School. http://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/publications

  • Parkin, B. (2000). Deadly readin’ writin’ and talkin’ project annual report: On the move. Adelaide: Salisbury North R-7 School. http://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/publications

  • Parkin, B. (2001). Deadly readin’ writin’ and talkin’ project annual report: Getting somewhere. Adelaide: Salisbury North R-7 School. http://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/publications

  • Parkin, B. (2014). South Australian accelerated literacy program: Final report. Adelaide: DECD. https://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/reports/parkin-b-2014-saalp-final-report-adelaide-saalp

  • Pearson, P. D., & Hiebert, E. H. (2010). National reports in literacy. Educational Researcher, 39(4), 286–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D., Gray, B., & Cowey, W. (1998). Providing access to academic literate discourse for Indigenous learners. Ngoonjook, 15, 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAALP (2013). Effective school Rubric’ DECD. Adelaide: SAALP. https://www.alpaa.com.au/sites/default/files/downloads/fs10_effective_school_rubric_2013.pdf

  • Siegel, D. J. (2001). Toward an interpersonal neurobiology of the developing mind: Attachment relationships, mindsight, and neural integration. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S. (2002). Phonics they really use: Phonics in a balanced literacy program. Paper presented at the CIERA, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. (1985). Affect attunement: Mechanisms and clinical implications. In J. Call, E. Galenson, & R. Tyson (Eds.), Frontiers of infant psychiatry (Vol. 2). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugrue, C. (1997). Complexities of teaching: Child-centred perspectives. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevarthen, C. (1998). The child’s need to learn a culture. In M. Woodhead (Ed.), Cultural worlds of early childhood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2006). Why literacy matters. In Education for all: Global monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanblaere, B., & Devos, G. (2016). Exploring the link between experienced teachers’ learning outcomes and individual and professional learning community characteristics. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhorp, J. (2008). Effective contexts for accelerated literacy. Adelaide: DECD. http://www.alpaa.com.au/resources/publications

  • Wilson, B. (2013). A share in the future: The review of Indigenous education in the Northern Territory. Darwin: NTDETE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1989). Social interaction as tutoring. In M. H. Bornstein & J. S. Bruner (Eds.), Interaction in human development. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Bronwyn Parkin

Authors
  1. Bronwyn Parkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bronwyn Parkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Jennifer Rennie

  2. University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

    Helen Harper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parkin, B. (2019). Good Theory, Good Systems: An Instance of Accelerated Literacy Pedagogy Implementation. In: Rennie, J., Harper, H. (eds) Literacy Education and Indigenous Australians. Language Policy, vol 19. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8629-9_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8628-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8629-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation