Skip to main content

Calibration of SUMO for Indian Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Traffic Engineering

Abstract

Efficient modelling of vehicular traffic is a challenging task in the context of Indian traffic conditions. One of the approaches for modelling traffic is using simulation. Though there are several traffic simulation software available, all of them are developed for the lane based and homogeneous traffic conditions. However, traffic conditions in many countries are heterogeneous and lane-less and for simulating such traffic, either specific software needs to be developed or calibration of existing software for such traffic conditions is required. For example, one of the commonly used software, namely VISSIM can be calibrated for such traffic conditions and is already reported in literature. However, VISSIM being licensed software, researchers have developed an open source software, namely Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO). Though the initial development of SUMO focused on homogeneous and lane disciplined traffic, later researchers started developing modules for the Indian traffic with its wide mix of vehicle types and improper lane discipline. This paper presents a methodology for the calibration of SUMO for Indian heterogeneous traffic conditions by calibrating its parameters. Data from a 2 km segment in Chennai was used for the calibration. In the first level, parameters that can affect the driving behaviour under such conditions were identified using sensitivity analysis and one-way ANOVA test. Then optimal combination of parameters were identified using Genetic Algorithm (GA). Performance comparison was done with calibrated VISSIM for the same test bed. Average speed obtained from both the simulation software (VISSIM and SUMO) were compared and the errors were calculated in terms of Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) with respect to actual speed values. Results were found to be comparable, indicating that SUMO can be calibrated for simulating Indian traffic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anand A, Ramadurai G, Vanajakshi L (2014) Data fusion-based traffic density estimation and prediction. J Intell Transp Syst 18(4):367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrisch M, Bieker L, Erdmann J, Krajzewicz D (2011) SUMO–simulation of urban mobility. In: The third international conference on advances in system simulation, Barcelona, Spain. ISBN: 978-1-61208-169-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron GD, Duncan GI (1996) PARAMICS—parallel microscopic simulation of road traffic. J Supercomput 10(1):25–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas J, Ferrer JL, Garcia D, Perarnau J, Torday A (2010) Traffic simulation with AIMSUN. Fundamentals of traffic simulation. Springer, New York, pp 173–232

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Q, Menendez M (2012) Sensitivity analysis for calibrating VISSIM in modeling the Zurich network. In: 12th Swiss transport research conference, Ascona, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Halati A, Lieu H, Walker S (1997) CORSIM—corridor traffic simulation model. In: Traffic congestion and traffic safety in the 21st century: challenges, innovations, and opportunities

    Google Scholar 

  • Horni A, Nagel K, Axhausen KW (2016) The multi-agent transport simulation MATSim. Ubiquity Press, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/baw. License: CC-BY 4.0

  • Husch D, Albeck J (2000) SIMTRAFFIC 5.0 user guide for windows

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjunatha P, Vortisch P, Mathew TV (2013) Methodology for the calibration of VISSIM in mixed traffic. In: Proceedings of 92nd annual meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew TV, Bajpai A (2012) SiMTraM—simulation of mixed traffic mobility. Quick tutorial. Available on https://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/tvm/SiMTraM_Web/html/docs/SiMTraM_Quick.pdf. Accessed on 10 Jan 2018

  • Mathew TV, Radhakrishnan P (2010) Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections. J Urban Plann Dev 136(1):59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIST/SEMATECH e-handbook of statistical methods. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/. Accessed on 10 Feb 2018

  • Park B, Qi H (2005) Development and evaluation of a procedure for the calibration of simulation models. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1934:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park B, Schneeberger JD (2002) Microscopic simulation model calibration and validation: a case study of VISSIM for a coordinated actuated signal system. Transportation research record, 03-2531

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel V, Chaturvedi M, Srivatsava S (2016) Comparison of SUMO and SiMTraM for Indian traffic scenario representation. Transp Res Procedia 17:400–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PTV Vision. VISSIM 5.30-05 user manual. https://www.et.byu.edu/~msaito/CE662MS/Labs/VISSIM_530_e.pdf

  • Punzo V, Ciuffo B (2009) How parameters of microscopic traffic flow models relate to traffic conditions and implications on model calibration. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2124:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratrout TN, Rahman SM (2008) A comparative analysis of currently used microscopic and macroscopic simulation software. Arab J Sci Eng 31(1):121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Seelam S, Mehar A, Praveen KGNV (2017) Simulation of traffic flow to analyze lane changes on multi-lane highways under non-lane discipline. Periodica Polytech Transp Eng. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.10150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddarth SMP, Ramadurai G (2013) Calibration of VISSIM for Indian heterogeneous traffic conditions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 104:380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith L, Beckman R, Baggerly K (1995) TRANSIMS: transportation analysis and simulation system (No. LA-UR–95-1641). Los Alamos National Lab, NM (United States)

    Google Scholar 

  • TransModeler traffic simulation software, Caliper.com (2016). Available: http://www.caliper.com/transmodeler/

  • Whitley D (1994) Stat computing: a genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat Comput 4(2):65–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Q, Koutsopoulos HN (1996) A microscopic traffic simulator for evaluation of dynamic traffic management systems. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 4(3):113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lelitha Vanajakshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sashank, Y., Navali, N.A., Bhanuprakash, A., Kumar, B.A., Vanajakshi, L. (2020). Calibration of SUMO for Indian Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions. In: Arkatkar, S., Velmurugan, S., Verma, A. (eds) Recent Advances in Traffic Engineering. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 69. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3742-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3742-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3741-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3742-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics