Skip to main content

Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Two-Way Flexural Capacity of Biaxial Voided Slab

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Structural Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 81))

Abstract

The rise in urbanisation and subsequent demand for infrastructure accelerates the use of concrete as a construction material. Conventional design practices need large member sizes to fulfil architectural and structural requirements. Hence, the size of structural members such as slab, beam, column, etc., significantly affects the quantity of concrete used. This calls for the need to optimise the use of concrete to reduce the self-weight of structure. The present study explores the possibility of biaxial voided slabs as a substitute for conventional reinforced concrete slabs. A typical biaxial voided slab eliminates concrete from the middle of the floor slab by introducing voids and it leads to a significant reduction in self-weight, about 30–50%. However, these voids reduce the sectional area of slab concrete, which leads to a reduction in flexural stiffness and shear resistance. The behaviour of the biaxial voided slab subjected to two-way flexure is discussed. Experiments are carried out to determine two-way flexural behaviour of the two-way slab with sphere shape voids by adopting 16-point loads. The obtained experimental results of strength and serviceability criteria are compared for slabs with and without voids. It is found that the flexural capacity of the two-way slab with biaxial voids is the same as a solid slab, with a minor reduction in its flexural stiffness. Furthermore, an analytical study is carried out based on the yield line analysis to predict the flexural capacity of the slab and compared with experimental results. It is evidenced that 16-point load is equivalent to 89% of uniformly distributed load and the flexural capacity of void slabs can be predicted by using yield line analysis as used in the conventional solid slab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

A st , b :

Area of bottom reinforcement;

A st , t :

Area of top reinforcement;

C :

Force in concrete per unit width of slab;

d :

Overall depth of slab;

d e :

Effective depth to bottom reinforcement;

d :

Effective depth to top reinforcement;

f cm :

Mean concrete cube compressive strength;

f st , b :

Stress in bottom reinforcement;

f st , t :

Stress in top reinforcement;

l :

Overall length of slab;

l e :

Effective length of slab;

m :

Ultimate moment capacity per unit width of slab;

m x :

Ultimate moment capacity per unit width of slab in x-direction;

m y :

Ultimate moment capacity per unit width of slab in y-direction;

P u :

Theoretical or experimental ultimate load (16-point load);

T b :

Force in bottom reinforcement;

T t :

Force in top reinforcement;

x u :

Neutral axis depth at ultimate;

x ̅ :

Depth of resultant compressive force in concrete;

W n :

Theoretical ultimate load (UDL) of solid slab based on YLA;

W u 1 :

Equivalent UDL of ultimate load without considering self-weight of slab;

W u 2 :

Equivalent UDL of ultimate load inclusive of self-weight of slab;

δ u :

Mid-span deflection of slab corresponds to ultimate load.

References

  1. BubbleDeck Technology (2008) BubbleDeck voided flat slab solutions—technical manual & documents. UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chung JH, Park JH, Choi HK, Lee SC, Choi CS (2010) An analytical study on the impact of hollow shapes in bi-axial hollow slabs. In: FraMCoS-7. Korea Concrete Institute, pp 1729–1736

    Google Scholar 

  3. Churakov AG (2014) Biaxial hollow slab with innovative types of voids. Constr Unique Build Struct 6:70–88

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cobiax Technologies (2010) Cobiax engineering manual. Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daliform Group (2014) U-Boot Beton® system study: lightened concrete slab by using U-Boot Beton®. Italy

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ibrahim AM, Ali NK, Salman WD (2013a) Flexural capacities of reinforced concrete two-way Bubbledeck slabs of plastic spherical voids. Diyala J Eng Sci 06:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim BH, Chung JH, Choi HK, Lee SC, Choi CS (2011) Flexural capacities of one-way hollow slab with donut type hollow sphere. Key Eng Mater 452–453:773–776. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.452-453.773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SH (2011) Flexural behavior of void RC and PC slab with polystyrene forms. Key Eng Mater 452–453:61–64. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.452-453.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sagadevan R, Nageswara Rao B (2019) Numerical study on flexural capacity of biaxial hollow slab. In: Rao ARM, Ramanjaneyulu K (eds) Recent advances in structural engineering, vol 1. Springer, Singapore, pp 97–105

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taskin K, Peker K (2014) Design factors and the economical application of spherical type voids in RC slabs. In: International scientific conference people, buildings and environment 2014, an international scientific conference. Kroměříž, Czech Republic, pp 448–458

    Google Scholar 

  11. Valivonis J, Jonaitis B, Zavalis R, Skuturna T, Šneideris A (2014) Flexural capacity and stiffness of monolithic biaxial hollow slabs. J Civ Eng Manag 20:693–701. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2014.917122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chung JH, Bae Bl, Choi HK, Jung HS, Choi CS (2018) Evaluation of punching shear strength of voided slabs considering the effect of the ratio b0/d. Eng Struct 164:70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.085

  13. Daliform Group (2012) U-Boot Beton® Disposable formworks for lightened structures in reinforced concrete cast on site. Italy

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sagadevan R, Nageswara Rao B (2017) Analytical studies on flexural capacity of biaxial hollow slab. In: Proceedings of the international conference on composite materials and structures (ICCMS). Hyderabad, India

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahim AM, Ali NK, Salman WD (2013b) Finite element analysis of reinforced concrete slabs with spherical voids. Diyala J Eng Sci 6:15–37

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chung JH, Jung HS, Bae Bl, Choi CS, Choi HK (2018) Two-way flexural behavior of donut-type voided slabs. Int J Concr Struct Mater 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0247-6

  17. Fall D, Shu J, Rempling R, Lundgren K, Zandi K (2014) Two-way slabs: experimental investigation of load redistributions in steel fibre reinforced concrete. Eng Struct 80:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matešan D, Radnić J, Grgić N, Čamber V (2012) Strength capacity of square reinforced concrete slabs. Mater Sci Eng 43:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/mawe.201200972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IS 456 (2000) Plain and reinforced concrete—code of practice. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  20. IS 1786 (2008) High strength deformed steel bars and wires for concrete reinforcement—specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wood RH (1961) Plastic and elastic design of slabs and plates. Thames and Hudson, Londan

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor R, Maher DRH, Hayes B (1966) Effect of the arrangement of reinforcement on the behaviour of reinforced concrete slabs. Mag Concr Res 18:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1967.19.58.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sawczuk A, Winnicki L (1965) Plastic behavior of simply supported reinforced concrete plates at moderately large deflections. Int J Solids Struct 1:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(65)90019-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor R (1965) A note on a possible basis for a new method of ultimate load design of reinforced concrete slabs. Mag Concr Res 17:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.1965.17.53.183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kemp KO (1967) Yield of a square reinforced concrete slab. Struct Eng 45:235–240

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Department of Science & Technology, India (SR/S3/MERC/0040/2012). The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance and facilities offered by the technical staff, Structural Engineering Laboratory, IIT Madras.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Sagadevan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sagadevan, R., Rao, B.N. (2021). Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Two-Way Flexural Capacity of Biaxial Voided Slab. In: Adhikari, S., Dutta, A., Choudhury, S. (eds) Advances in Structural Technologies. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 81. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5235-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5235-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5234-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5235-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics