Skip to main content

Dynamic Analysis for Healthy and Defective Gears: A Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Recent Developments in Acoustics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 934 Accesses

Abstract

There are ample literature addressing the dynamic analysis for gears. In this paper, some important literature on dynamics of both healthy gears and gears with defects have been reviewed. Dynamic analysis of gears is significant from the condition monitoring point of view. Single degree of freedom dynamic model for spur gears has been detailed first. Dynamic study for worm gear with force analysis has been reported. Also, the effect of defects like crack and spall on dynamic behavior of gears studied by researchers has been included in this review. The study of defect model can be utilized in improving the efficiency of the system and preventing the failures in industries as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

c1, c2:

Damping coefficients of first and second tooth pair in mesh, respectively

c m :

Mesh damping coefficient

D(t):

Instantaneous defect width along the contact line

e(t):

Static transmission error

e 1, e 2 :

Displacement excitations due to gear error

F 0 :

External torque load

Fx, Fy, Fz:

Three orthogonal force components

F(t):

Defect morphology

G(t):

Time-periodic defect excitation generated by tooth shape deviations and errors

I1, I2:

Mass moments of inertia of gear no. 1 and 2, respectively

Jw, Jg, J4:

Moment of inertias of the worm, worm gear, and the flywheel, respectively

Kw, Kg:

Elastic constants of the worm shaft and the worm gear shaft, respectively

k :

Total mesh stiffness of the gear pair

k 0 :

The mesh stiffness per unit contact length

k1, k2:

Stiffness of first and second tooth pair in mesh, respectively

k a :

Axial compressive stiffness

k m :

Mean mesh stiffness of one pair contacted with healthy teeth

k t :

Stiffness of a single tooth

\( k_{f} \), \( k_{b} \), \( k_{s} \):

Fillet-foundation, bending, shear stiffness, respectively

k i :

Mesh stiffness of the ith tooth pair

k tooth :

Total mesh stiffness due to teeth deformation of N tooth pairs

\( k_{{s\_{\text{crack}}}} \), \( k_{{b\_{\text{crack}}}} \):

Shear and bending stiffness of cracked tooth, respectively

m e :

Equivalent mass

T1, T2:

Input and output torques, respectively

P(η):

Defect depth along the contact line

R1, R2:

Base radii of gear

rw, rg:

Pitch radii of the worm’s helical tooth and the worm gear, respectively

W0:

Static load

Wf, Wn:

Friction force, normal force

ɸ1, ɸ2:

Angular displacements of gear number 1 and 2, respectively

ɸ, ɸ:

First- and second-order derivatives of ɸ, respectively

θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4:

The rotation angles of worm shaft, worm’s body, worm- gear body, and flywheel, respectively

\( \phi_{n} \) :

The pressure angle

λ :

The worm’s lead angle

λ1, λ2:

Correction coefficients of the fillet-foundation stiffness for driving and driven gears, respectively

References

  1. Yang DCH, Sun ZS (1985) A rotary model for spur gear dynamics. ASME J Mech Transm Autom Des 107:529–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Özgüven HN, Houser DR (1988) Dynamic analysis of high speed gears by using loaded static transmission error. J Sound Vib 125(1):71–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Özgüven HN (1991) A non-linear mathematical model for dynamic analysis of spur gears including shaft and bearing dynamics. J Sound Vib 145(2):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahraman A, Singh R (1991) Non-linear dynamics of a geared rotor-bearing system with multiple clearances. J Sound Vib 144(3):469–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung MY, Shaw D (2007) Parametric study of dynamics of worm and worm-gear set under suddenly applied rotating angle. J Sound Vib 304(1):246–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dresig H, Schreiber U, Rodionow P (2007) Stability analysis and simulation of the vibration behavior of worm gears in drive systems. Wuxi, China: Proceedings of ICMEM, pp 24–28

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun W, Chen T, Zhang X (2011) A new method to calculate bending deformation of involute helical gear. UPB, Sci Bull, Series D China 73(3):17–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kar C, Mohanty AR (2008) Determination of time-varying contact length, friction force, torque and forces at the bearings in a helical gear system. J Sound Vib 309(1):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. El Badaoui M, Cahouet V, Guillet F, Daniere J, Velex P (2001) Modeling and detection of localized tooth defects in geared systems. J Mech Des, Trans ASME 123:422–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li CJ, Lee H, Choi SH (2002) Estimating size of gear tooth root crack using embedded modeling. Mech Syst Signal Process 16(5):841–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Choy FK, Polyshchuk V, Zakrajsek JJ, Handschuh RF, Townsend DP (1994) Analysis of the effects of surface pitting and wear on the vibrations of a gear transmission system (No. NASA-E-9014). National Aeronautics and Space Administration Cleveland Oh Lewis Research Centre

    Google Scholar 

  12. Choy FK, Mugler DH, Zhou J (2003) Damage identification of a gear transmission using vibration signatures. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 125(2):394–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chaari F, Fakhfakh T, Hbaieb R, Louati J, Haddar M (2006) Influence of manufacturing errors on the dynamic behavior of planetary gears. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27(7–8):738–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parey A, El Badaoui M, Guillet F, Tandon N (2006) Dynamic modelling of spur gear pair and application of empirical mode decomposition-based statistical analysis for early detection of localized tooth defect. J Sound Vib 294(3):547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Parey A, Tandon N (2007) Impact velocity modelling and signal processing of spur gear vibration for the estimation of defect size. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(1):234–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu S, Zuo M, Parey A (2008) Simulation of spur gear dynamics and estimation of fault growth. J Sound Vib 317(3):608–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaari F, Baccar W, Abbes MS, Haddar M (2008) Effect of spalling or tooth breakage on gearmesh stiffness and dynamic response of a one-stage spur gear transmission. Eur J Mech-A/Solid 27(4):691–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaari F, Fakhfakh T, Haddar M (2009) Analytical modelling of spur gear tooth crack and influence on gear mesh stiffness. Eur J Mech-A/Solid 28(3):461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma H, Pang X, Feng R, Zeng J, Wen B (2015) Improved time-varying mesh stiffness model of cracked spur gears. Eng Fail Anal 55:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simon V (2003) Load distribution in cylindrical worm gears. Trans-ASME J Mech Des 125(2):356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma R, Chen Y, Cao Q (2012) Research on dynamics and fault mechanism of spur gear pair with spalling defect. J Sound Vib 331(9):2097–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang H, Shao Y, Mechefske CK (2014) Dynamic characteristics of helical gears under sliding friction with spalling defect. Eng Fail Anal 39:92–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Litvin FL, Gonzalez-Perez I, Yukishima K, Fuentes A, Hayasaka K (2007) Design, simulation of meshing, and contact stresses for an improved worm gear drive. Mech Mach Theory 42(8):940–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Večeř P, Kreidl M, Šmíd R (2005) Condition indicators for gearbox condition monitoring systems. Acta Polytech 45(6)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Loutas TH, Sotiriades G, Kalaitzoglou I, Kostopoulos V (2009) Condition monitoring of a single-stage gearbox with artificially induced gear cracks utilizing on-line vibration and acoustic emission measurements. Appl Acoust 70(9):1148–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Waqar T, Demetgul M (2016) Thermal analysis MLP neural network-based fault diagnosis on worm gears. Measurement 86:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swati Gautam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gautam, S., Khanam, S., Tandon, N. (2021). Dynamic Analysis for Healthy and Defective Gears: A Review. In: Singh, M., Rafat, Y. (eds) Recent Developments in Acoustics. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5776-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5776-7_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5775-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5776-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics