Abstract
Sustainability discourses and criticisms of modernization speak to spiritual and moral crises as well as ecological, economic and social ones. Beyond a green ideology, the inhabitants of Hungarian eco-villages are involved with a variety of other worldviews and groups related to the supernatural: with traditional religions, new religious communities, different kinds of spiritual movements and to groups that are committed to what their members consider to be traditional, ancient Hungarian culture alike. Each community is characterized by the presence of elements of eco-spirituality, a holistic attitude and nature faith at some level. In this paper, I discuss the role of religion, belief and spirituality in the life of Hungarian eco-villages.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The concept of integrative spirituality religion is comprised of elements of official, folk and individual faith. See Bowman (2009).
- 2.
Like many other small settlements in Hungary, Visnyeszéplak does not have its own priest.
- 3.
One important reason for not finding a unified nature faith in Hungarian eco-villages is to be found in how they conceptualize nature: There are two dominant understandings of nature in these communities. For some, nature is an ethos, while for others it is an autonomous entity that is more or less independent of human society. For more detail on these questions, see: Aitamurto and Simpson (2013), Farkas (2018), Ivakhiv (2005).
References
Aitamurto, K., & Simpson, S. (Eds.). (2013). Modern Pagan and Native Faith Movements in Central and Eastern Europe. Durham: Acumen.
Bookchin, M. (1996). The philosophy of social ecology: Essays on dialectical naturalism. Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Bowman, M. (2009). From Glastonbury to Hungary: Contemporary integrative spirituality and vernacular religion in context. In G. Vargyas (Ed.), Passageways: From Hungarian ethnography to European ethnology and sociocultural anthropology (pp. 195−221). Budapest−Pécs: Department of European Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, The University of Pécs—L’Harmattan Publishing House.
Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell.
Devall, B. (1995). The ecological self. In A. Drengson & Y. Inoue (Eds.), The deep ecology movement (pp. 101–123). Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.
Domaniczky, O., & Kuslits, B. (2020). Megújítod a Föld színét. Szentignáci lelkiségi gyakorlatok Isten, ember, természet hármasában. Budapest: Ignáci Pedagógiai Műhely. http://ignacipedagogia.hu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/lelkieszkoz_v2.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.
Drengson, A., & Devall, B. (Eds.). (2010). The ecology of wisdom: Writings by Arne Naess. Berkeley: Counterpoint.
Escobar, A. (2001). Culture sits in places: Reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization. Political Geography, 20, 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0962-6298(00)00064-0.
Farkas J. (2009). „Krisna egyik kertje.” Hitorientált életmód és környezet-átalakítás Somogyvámoson [One of Krishna’s gardens: Faith-oreinted lifestyle and the transformation of the environment]. In B. Andrásfalvy (Ed.), Antropogén ökológiai változások a Kárpát-medencében (pp. 331−346). Budapest: L’Harmattan.
Farkas, J. (2016). ‘Where is the large garden that awaits me?’: Critique through spatial practice in a Hungarian ecological community. Socio.hu, 6, Special issue in English 4, 116−134.
Farkas, J. (2017). ‘Very little heroes’: History and roots of the eco-village movement. Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, 62(1), 69–87.
Farkas, J. (2018). Nature faith and native faith as integrative spiritualities in Hungarian ecovillages. Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature & Culture, 12(2), 125–146.
Farkas, J. (2019). “The body has no soul, the soul has a body”: The concept of soul and nature in the Hungarian Krishna Valley ecovillage. In É. Pócs (Ed.), Body, soul, spirits and supernatural communication (pp. 34–53). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Halfacree, K. (2001). Going ‘back-to-the-land’ again: Extending the scope of counterurbanisation. Espace, Populations, Societes, 19(1–2), 161–170.
Halfacree, K. (2003a). A place for ‘nature’? New radicalism’s rural contribution. In Rural Geography Research Group/Commission de Ge´ographie Rurale (Eds.), Innovations in rural areas, CERAMAC 22 (pp. 51–65). Clermont-Ferrand: Presses Universitaires Blaise Pascal.
Halfacree, K. (2003b). Landscapes of rurality: Rural others=other rurals. In I. Roberston & P. Richards (Eds.), Studying cultural landscapes (pp. 141–169). London: Arnold.
Halfacree, K. (2006). From dropping out to leading on? British counter-cultural back-to-the-land in a changing rurality. Progress in Human Geography, 3, 309–336.
Halfacree, K. (2007). Trial by space for a ‘radical rural’: Introducing alternative localities, representations and lives. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 125–141.
Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Horlings, L. G. (2015). Values in place: A value-oriented approach toward sustainable place-shaping. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2(1), 257–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2015.1014062.
Ivakhiv, A. (2005). Nature and ethnicity in East European Paganism: An environmental ethic of the religious right? Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies, 8(2), 194−225.
Jackson, H., & Svensson, K. (Eds.). (2002). Ecovillage living: Restoring the earth and her people. Cambridge: Green Books.
Kay, J. (1988). Concepts of nature in the Hebrew Bible. Environmental Ethics, 10(4), 309–327.
Litfin, K. (2005). Gaia theory: Intimations for global environmental politics. In P. Dauvergne (Ed.), Handbook of environmental politics (pp. 500–518). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Livingstone, D. N. (1994). The historical roots of our ecological crisis: A reassessment. Fides et Historia, 26, 38–55.
Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Manzella, J. C. (2010). Common purse, uncommon future: The long, strange trip of communes and other intentional communities. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Meijering, L. (2006). Making a place of their own: Rural intentional communities in Northwest Europe. Dissertation, Utrecht: Royal Dutch Geographical Society; Groningen: Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen. http://dissertations.ub.rug.nl/faculties/rw/2006/l.meijering/?pLanguage=en&pFullItemRecord=ON. Accessed 3 July 2017.
Miller, T. (1998). The quest for Utopia in twentieth-century America: Volume I: 1900–1960. Syracuse and New York: Syracuse University Press.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagybán, P. E. (2017). Élő hit − élő falu? A közös vallás hatása egy ökologikus helyi közösség összetartó erejére [Living faith—Living village? The effect of common religion on social? Cohesion in a local ecological community]. Thesis, ELTE TáTK, Humánökológia szak, Budapest.
Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
Shenker, B. (1986). Intentional Communities: Ideology and alienation’ in communal societies. New York: Routledge.
Simpson, S., & Filip, M. (2013). Selected words for modern pagan and native faith movements in Central and Eastern Europe. In K. Aitamurto, & S. Simpson (Eds.), Modern pagan and native faith movements in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 27–43). Durham: Acumen.
Soja, E. (1990). Postmodern geographies: The reassertation of space in critical social theory. London and New York: Verso.
Taylor, B. (Ed.). (1995). Ecological resistance movements. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Taylor, B. (2010a). Dark green religion: Preface. In B. Taylor, Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future (pp. ix–xii). Berkeley: University of California Press. http://www.brontaylor.com/environmental_books/dgr/preface.html#continued. Accessed 14 July 2017.
Taylor, B. (2010b). Introducing religion and dark green religion. In B. Taylor (Ed.), Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future (pp. 1–12). Berkeley: University of California Press. http://www.ucpress.edu/content/chapters/9957.ch01.pdf. Accessed 14 July 2017.
Taylor, N. (2000). Ecovillages: Dream and reality. In H. Barton (Ed.), Sustainable communities: The potential of eco-neighbourhoods (pp. 19–28). London: Earthscan Ltd.
Todd, J. A. (2013). The ‘lacking’ narrative: Why intentional community members choose to live a more demanding lifestyle. Lecture, Ethnography Conference, Chicago. https://www.academia.edu/6590849/The_Lacking_Narrative_Why_Intentional_Community_Members_Choose_To_Live_A_More_Demanding_Lifestyle. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.
Van Schyndel Kasper, D. (2008). Redefining community in the ecovillage. Human Ecology Review, 15(1), 12−24.
White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.
Other Online Sources
http://www.elofaluhalozat.hu. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.
http://gen.ecovillage.org. Accessed 28 Jan 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farkas, J. (2021). Religion and Spirituality in Hungarian Eco-Villages. In: Silvern, S.E., Davis, E.H. (eds) Religion, Sustainability, and Place. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7646-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7646-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7645-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7646-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)