Skip to main content

Morphological Systems of Open Spaces in Built Environment Prone to Sudden-Onset Disasters

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2020

Abstract

Recent events have shown how the Built Environment (BE), defined as a network of buildings, infrastructures, and open spaces, and its users are more and more prone to disasters, showing very poor resilience. The chapter focuses on the state of the art concerning the relation between BE and SUdden-Onset Disasters (SUOD) considering risks and human behavior. Results concerning the characterization of BE prone to SUODs underline the primary importance of open spaces in the Built Environment, as elements to characterize in respect to the possible emergency phases and the behavior of the BEs users. Attention is given to the BE constituting the base elements for urban areas (i.e., compact historic city) because of the related risk-affecting specific conditions (i.e., crowding, the complexity of overall BEs form, built element features, BEs uses). Moving from different open spaces types classification, the chapter defines morphological classes of BE representative of the variables of urban systems that interact with the identified SUODs risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. WHO: Definitions: emergencies, https://www.who.int/hac/about/definitions/en/. Accessed on 29 Nov 2019

  2. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR): Terminology, https://www.preventionweb.net/files/7817_UNISDRTerminologyEnglish.pdf. Accessed on 29 Nov 2019

  3. Dickson, E., Baker, J.L., Hoornweg, D., Asmita, T.: Urban Risk Assessments (2012). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8962-1

  4. Miller, W.: What does built environment research have to do with risk mitigation, resilience and disaster recovery? Sustain. Cities Soc. 19, 91–97 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cerѐ, G., Rezgui, Y., Zhao, W.: Critical review of existing built environment resilience frameworks: directions for future research. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 25, 173–189 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Santamouris, M., Cartalis, C., Synnefa, A.: Local urban warming, possible impacts and a resilience plan to climate change for the historical center of Athens. Greece. Sustain. Cities Soc. 19, 281–291 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Amico, A., Currà, E.: The role of urban built heritage in qualify and quantify resilience. Specific issues in mediterranean city. Proc. Econ. Fin. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00929-0

  8. Fatiguso, F., De Fino, M., Cantatore, E., Caponio, V.: Resilience of historic built environments: inherent qualities and potential strategies. Proc. Eng. 180, 1024–1033 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Currà, E., Angelosanti, M., D’Amico, A.: Integrated digital tools for earthquake risk reduction in historic urban landscape of central Italy. In: 4th Digital Landscape International Symposium. Nanjing (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch, K.: Good city form. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Batty, M.: Cities and complexity. Underst. Cities with cell. Autom. AgentBased Model. Fractals 14, 124–125 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The social logic of space. Cambridge University Press (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caniggia, G., Maffei, G.L.: Architectural composition and building typology : interpreting basic building. Alinea (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Conzen, M.R.G.: Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Trans. Pap. (Institute Br. Geogr.) (1960). https://doi.org/10.2307/621094

  15. Koren, D., Rus, K.: The potential of open space for enhancing urban seismic resilience. Literat. Rev. Sustain. 11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215942

  16. Ronzani, G., Boschi, F.: Contributi di metodo per la lettura degli spazi urbani. CLUEB (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mandolesi, E., Ferrero, A.: Piazze del Piceno. Gangemi Editore spa (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moughtin, C.: The European city street, part 1: paths and places. Town Plan. Rev. 62, 51–77 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.62.1.j0v4j745161766r6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Forbes, G.: Urban roadway classification. Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, Texas (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mandolesi, E., Ferrero, A.: Piazze del Piceno. Gangemi (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oliveri (a cura di), M.: Regione Umbria. Vulnerabilità urbana e prevenzione urbanistica degli effetti del sisma, il caso di Nocera Umbra. Urban. Quad. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Italian technical commission for seismic micro-zoning: Manuale per l’analisi della CONDIZIONE LIMITE PER L’EMERGENZA (CLE) dell’insediamento urbano (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cherubini, A., Reluis, P.: Rischio sismico di Sistemi Urbani utilizzando l’ analogia delle reti neuronali. ANIDIS2009BOLOGNA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zheng, X., Zhong, T., Liu, M.: Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches. Build. Environ. 44, 437–445 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ranjbar, H.R., Dehghani, H., Ardalan, A.R.A., Saradjian, M.R.: A GIS-based approach for earthquake loss estimation based on the immediate extraction of damaged buildings. Geomatics, Nat. Hazards Risk. 8, 772–791 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1265013

  26. Woo, G.: Understanding the principles of terrorism risk modeling from Charlie Hebdo attack in Paris. Def. Terror. Rev. 7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the MIUR (the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research) Project BE S2ECURe — (make) Built Environment Safer in Slow and Emergency Conditions through behavioUral assessed/designed Resilient solutions (Grant number: 2017LR75XK).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Russo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Russo, M. et al. (2021). Morphological Systems of Open Spaces in Built Environment Prone to Sudden-Onset Disasters . In: Littlewood, J., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Sustainability in Energy and Buildings 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 203. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8783-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics