Skip to main content

Design of an Expert System for Decision Making in Complex Regulatory and Technology Implementation Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design for Tomorrow—Volume 3

Abstract

Project planning is a critical event for overall success of a project. Project planning in business technology projects is a multidisciplinary activity. Many times, project planning overlooks interdependencies and fails to utilize the historical knowledge and best practices, resulting in re-work. To address this gap, an AI expert system was designed that can facilitate flawless intake and planning. This system ensures work “starts right” by enforcing the entry criteria and allows tailoring of the project plan based on project type and complexity. This technology system is built using a rules-based design engine and optimized search algorithm that covers multiple domains like software engineering, regulations and risk management, and computer system validation. This system aligns very closely with the software development best practices of industry standards such as CMMi and GAMP. This system also seamlessly interfaces with project management systems to enable stage gate reviews and track project outcomes at the later stages of execution and project close out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pun, L.: Methodologies for designing expert system for industrial management. IFAC Proc. 18(9), (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robinson, P.: Role of the expert system in project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 7(1) (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, J.U.M.: Expert systems in project management. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 5(1) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Seiler, R.K.: Reasoning about uncertainty in certain expert systems: implications for project management applications. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 8(1) (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ahuja, A., Rödderin, W.: Project Risk Management by a Probabilistic Expert System in Operations Research Proceedings (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khameneh, A.-H., et al.: Offering a framework for evaluating the performance of project risk management system. In: Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences Volume 22614 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanchez, F., et al.: An approach based on Bayesian network for improving project management maturity: an application to reduce cost overrun risks in engineering projects. Comput. Ind. 119 (2020). Article 103227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ginsberg, M.P., Quinn, L.H.: Process Tailoring and the Software Capability Maturity Model, Technical Report CMU/SEI-94-TR-024 by SEI, CMI (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Silveira, A., et al.: Agile methods tailoring—a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 110 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tauzovich, B., et al.: An expert advisory system for government regulations: knowledge acquisition methodology. IFAC Proc. 19(17) (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McCauley, N., et al.: The use of expert systems in the healthcare industry. Inf. Manag. 22(4) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Seto, E., et al.: Developing healthcare rule-based expert systems: case study of a heart failure telemonitoring system. Int. J. Med. Inf. 81(8) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, L., et al.: Structure learning for belief rule base expert system: a comparative study. Knowl.-Based Syst. 39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rotolo, A.: Rule-based agents, compliance, and intention reconsideration in defeasible logic. In: Proceedings of RuleML, Springer, Berlin (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sachdeva, et al.: Expert System for Project Management in IEEE (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schuyler, J.R.: Expert systems in project management, a PMI Article (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Buchanan, B.G., et al.: Expert System Project Management. In: 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Whitaker, S.: The benefits of tailoring, A PMI White Paper (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Boehm, B., Basili, V.: Software defect reduction Top 10 List. IEEE Computer

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors recognize the effort and help of other co-workers and partners who helped in this work at different points of time and during the execution of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kausik Bhattacharya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bhattacharya, K., Gangopadhyay, S., DeBrule, C. (2021). Design of an Expert System for Decision Making in Complex Regulatory and Technology Implementation Projects. In: Chakrabarti, A., Poovaiah, R., Bokil, P., Kant, V. (eds) Design for Tomorrow—Volume 3. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 223. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0084-5_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0083-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0084-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics