Skip to main content

Learning Behavior-Aware Cognitive Diagnosis for Online Education Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science (ICPCSEE 2021)

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis, which aims to diagnose students’ knowledge proficiency, is crucial for numerous online education applications, such as personalized exercise recommendation. Existing methods in this area mainly exploit students’ exercising records, which ignores students’ full learning process in online education systems. Besides, the latent relation of exercises with course structure and texts is still underexplored. In this paper, a learning behavior-aware cognitive diagnosis (LCD) framework is proposed for students’ cognitive modeling with both learning behavior records and exercising records. The concept of LCD was first introduced to characterize students’ knowledge proficiency more completely. Second, a course graph was designed to explore rich information existed in course texts and structures. Third, an interaction function was put forward to explore complex relationships between students, exercises and videos. Extensive experiments on a real-world dataset prove that LCD predicts student performance more effectively, the output of LCD is also interpretable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cen, H., Koedinger, K., Junker, B.: Learning factors analysis – a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. De La Torre, J.: Dina model and parameter estimation: a didactic. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 34(1), 115–130 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DiBello, L.V., Roussos, L.A., Stout, W.: 31a review of cognitively diagnostic assessment and a summary of psychometric models. Handb. Stat. 26, 979–1030 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P.: Item Response Theory. Psychology Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glorot, X., Bengio, Y.: Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 249–256 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H., et al.: Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2(5), 359–366 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hou, L., la Torre, J.D., Nandakumar, R.: Differential item functioning assessment in cognitive diagnostic modeling: application of the Wald test to investigate DIF in the DINA model. J. Educ. Measur. 51(1), 98–125 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang, Z., Yin, Y., Chen, E., Xiong, H., Su, Y., Hu, G., et al.: EKT: exercise-aware knowledge tracing for student performance prediction. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 30, 100–105 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kipf, T.N., Welling, M.: Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016)

  10. Liu, Q., et al.: Fuzzy cognitive diagnosis for modelling examinee performance. ACM Trans. Intelli. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 9(4), 1–26 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Y., et al.: Collaborative learning team formation: a cognitive modeling perspective. In: Navathe, S.B., Wu, W., Shekhar, S., Du, X., Wang, X.S., Xiong, H. (eds.) DASFAA 2016. LNCS, vol. 9643, pp. 383–400. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32049-6_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, A.J., Lazendic, G.: Computer-adaptive testing: implications for students’ achievement, motivation, engagement, and subjective test experience. J. Educ. Psychol. 110(1), 27 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakagawa, H., Iwasawa, Y., Matsuo, Y.: Graph-based knowledge tracing: modeling student proficiency using graph neural network. In: 2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI), pp. 156–163. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pan, L., Li, C., Li, J., Tang, J.: Prerequisite relation learning for concepts in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1447–1456 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peng, H., et al.: Fine-grained event categorization with heterogeneous graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.04580 (2019)

  16. Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505–513 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reckase, M.D.: Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models, pp. 79–112. Springer, New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89976-3

  18. Scarselli, F., Gori, M., Tsoi, A.C., Hagenbuchner, M., Monfardini, G.: The graph neural network model. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 20(1), 61–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thai-Nghe, N., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Multi-relational factorization models for student modeling in intelligent tutoring systems. In: 2015 Seventh International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE), pp. 61–66. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, F., et al.: Neural cognitive diagnosis for intelligent education systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08733 (2019)

  21. Ying, R., He, R., Chen, K., Eksombatchai, P., Hamilton, W.L., Leskovec, J.: Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 974–983 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu, J., et al.: MOOCCube: a large-scale data repository for NLP applications in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 3135–3142 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., Yeung, D.Y.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 765–774 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1005100). It also got partial support from National Engineering Laboratory for Cyberlearning and Intelligent Technology, and Beijing Key Lab of Networked Multimedia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiming Mao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mao, Y. et al. (2021). Learning Behavior-Aware Cognitive Diagnosis for Online Education Systems. In: Zeng, J., Qin, P., Jing, W., Song, X., Lu, Z. (eds) Data Science. ICPCSEE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1452. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5943-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5943-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5942-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5943-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics