Abstract
City-making is a process in which several endogenous and exogenous variables associated with socio-economic, environmental, historical, and physical parameters play a significant role. The neoliberal and market-led notion of smart cities is highly criticized by many scholars for its polarized and inequitable approach to development. The traditional communities have continued for generations and inherit a unique living and residential culture bestowing them with an inherent smartness quotient. This concept of smartness for city planning is even more critical during the present times to understand the impact of the spatial structure of existing cities to deal with the COVID-19 outbreak. Authors identify a strong need to merge the two concepts of traditional communities and urban smartness for a holistic approach to building smart communities. This study aims to assess the smart spatial attributes of the traditional neighborhood-level urban communities such as compactness, walkability, and diversity. Primary household surveys were conducted in the walled city of Alwar, Rajasthan, India. The case study reveals compactly designed residential enclaves known as mohallas with mixed land use. The indigenous spatial elements such as squares (chowks), markets (bazaars), and streets (gali) proved to be crucial community gathering places for these settlements. Such zero-level assessment of existing socio-cultural and spatial attributes may enable the appropriate integration of intelligent technologies into our urban systems. Authors recommend harnessing the untapped potential of traditional communities in culturally rich countries like India to achieve the goals of a smart community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
UN-Habitat.: State of The World’s Cities 2012/2013 Prosperity of Cities (2013)
Zhang, X.Q.: The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world. Habitat Int. 54(13), 241–252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.018
The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.: 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects (2018)
Hoelscher, K.: The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India. Int. Area Stud. Rev. 19(1), 28–44 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/2233865916632089
UN-Habitat.: People-Centered Smart Cities (2021)
Alawadhi, S., et al.: Building understanding of smart city initiatives. Lecture Notes Computer Science (including Subseries Lecture Notes Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes Bioinformatics), vol. 7443 LNCS, pp. 40–53 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_4
Angelidou, M.: The role of smart city characteristics in the plans of fifteen cities. J. URBAN Technol. 24(4), 3–28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1348880
Martin, C.J., Evans, J., Karvonen, A.: Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 133, 269–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.005
Nilssen, M.: To the smart city and beyond? Developing a typology of smart urban innovation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 142, 98–104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.060
Tonkiss, F.: Cities by Design: The Social Life of Urban Form. Polity Press, Cambridge (2013)
Hollands, R.G.: Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12(3), 303–320 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810802479126
Garcia-Ayllon, S., Miralles, J.L.: New strategies to improve governance in territorial management: evolving from ‘smart cities’ to ‘smart territories.’ Procedia Eng. 118, 3–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.396
United Nations Environment Programme.: Issue brief SDG 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1080-0_ch11
de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., Weijnen, M.: Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J. Clean. Prod. 109, 25–38 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
Brundtland, G.H.: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future (1987)
Woodbridge, M.: Cities and the Sustainable Development Goals (2016)
Dhingra, M., Chattopadhyay, S.: Advancing smartness of traditional settlements- case analysis of indian and arab old cities. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 5, 549–563 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.08.004
Aurigi, A., Odendaal, N.: From ‘Smart in the Box’ to ‘Smart in the City’: rethinking the socially sustainable smart city in context. J. Urban Technol., pp. 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1704203
United for Smart Sustainable Cities.: Connecting cities and communities with the Sustainable Development Goals (2017)
NASSCOM.: Integrated ICT and Geo-Spatial Technologies Framework for the 100 Smart Cities Mission (2015)
Angelidou, M.: Smart city policies: a spatial approach. Cities 41, 3–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
Angelidou, M.: Smart cities: a conjuncture of four forces. Cities 47, 95–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.004
Angelidou, M.: Smart City Strategy: Rio de Janeiro (Brazil) (2015). http://www.urenio.org/2015/03/23/smart-city-strategy-rio-de-janeiro-brazil/. Accessed 01 Sep. 2016
Audirac, I.: Information technology and urban form: challenges to smart growth. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 28(2), 119–145 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604273624
Barrionuevo, J.M., Berrone, P., Ricart, J.E.: Smart cities, sustainable progress. IESE Insight 14(14), 50–57 (2012)
Gaffney, C., Robertson, C.: Smarter than smart: Rio de Janeiro’s flawed emergence as a smart city. J. Urban Technol. 0732(April), 1–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1102423
Jaffe, E.: 4 lessons from Rio’s ‘flawed’ smart cities initiative (2016). https://medium.com/sidewalk-talk/4-lessons-from-rios-flawed-smart-cities-initiative-31cbf4e54b72#.kaobtxl58
Yigitcanlar, T., Lee, S.H.: Korean ubiquitous-eco-city: a smart-sustainable urban form or a branding hoax? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 89, 100–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034
Mahizhnan, A.: Smart cities. Cities 16(1), 13–18 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(98)00050-X
Fietkiewicz, K.J., Stock, W.G.: How ‘smart’ are Japanese Cities? An empirical investigation of infrastructures and governmental programs in Tokyo, Yokohama, Osaka, and Kyoto. In: Proceedings of Annual Hawaii International Confernce System Science, vol. 2015-March, pp. 2345–2354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2015.282
Ishida, T.: Activities and technologies in digital city Kyoto. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 3081, 166–187 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11407546_8
Bakici, T., Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 4(2), 135–148 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
Neyazi, Y.: Deconstruction of Urban Space in Saudi Cities, pp. 1–14 (2008)
Kiet, A.: Arab culture and urban form. Focus (Madison) 7(1), 36–45 (2010)
Hajer, M.A., Zonneveld, W.: Spatial planning in the network society-rethinking the principles of planning in the Netherlands. Eur. Plan. Stud. 8(3), 337–355 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/713666411
Van Der Valk, A.: The Dutch planning experience. Landsc. Urban Plan. 58(2–4), 201–210 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00221-3
Aurigi, A., Odendaal, N.: “From ``Smart in the Box{’’} to ``Smart in the City{’’}: Rethinking the Socially Sustainable Smart City in Context. J. Urban Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1704203
Das, D.: In pursuit of being smart? A critical analysis of India’s smart cities endeavor. URBAN Geogr. 41(1), 55–78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2019.1646049
Rajput, S., Arora, K.: Sustainable Smart Cities in India: Challenges and Future Perspectives (2017)
Dhingra, M., Chattopadhyay, S.: A systematic text-analytics-based meta-synthesis approach for smart urban development. Int. J. Urban Plan. Smart Cities 3(1) (2021)
Dhingra, M., Chattopadhyay, S.: A fuzzy approach for assessment of smart socio-cultural attributes of a historic urban landscape: case study of Alwar walled city in India. Sustain. Cities Soc. 69, 102855 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102855
Dhingra, M., Chattopadhyay, S.: Fuzzy approach for assessment of smart urban attributes of traditional urban systems in India. In: International Conference On Resilient & Liveable City Planning (RLCP—2020) Transforming Urban Systems, pp. 323–326 (2021)
Dhingra, M., Singh, M.K., Chattopadhyay, S.: Macro level characterization of historic urban landscape : case study of Alwar walled city City. Cult. Soc. 9, 39–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2016.10.001
Kostof, S.: The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings throughout History. Boston (1991)
Wilson, P.J.: The Domestication of the Human Species. Yale University Press (2009)
Center for Early Modern History, University of Minnesota.: City Walls: The Urban Enceinte in Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press (2000)
Upadhyaya, V., Jakhanwal, M.P.: Traditional walled cities of Rajasthan India: a sustainable planning concept. Int. J. Eng. Res. Manag. Technol. 2(3), 204–217 (2015)
NCR Planning Board.: Economic Profile of NCR (2015) (Online). Available: http://ncrpb.nic.in/pdf_files/FinalReport of study of economic profile_17122015.pdf
Town Planning Department.: Master Plan 2011–2031. Alwar (2011)
Lall, S.: Settlements of the Poor and Guidelines for Urban Upgrading: Case Study of Alwar, a Secondary Town (2001)
Maps of India (2021). www.mapsofindia.com
Dhingra, M., Singh, M.K., Chattopadhyay, S.: Rapid assessment tool for traditional Indian neighbourhoods: a case study of Alwar walled city in Rajasthan. Sustain. Cities Soc. 26, 364–382 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.015
Schwarz, N.: Urban form revisited-Selecting indicators for characterising European cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 96, 29–47 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.007
Lan, T., Shao, G., Xu, Z., Tang, L., Sun, L.: Measuring urban compactness based on functional characterization and human activity intensity by integrating multiple geospatial data sources. Ecol. Indic. 121, 107177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107177
Neuman, M.: The compact city fallacy. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 25(1), 11–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04270466
Kotharkar, R., Bahadure, P., Sarda, N.: Measuring compact urban form: a case of Nagpur city, India. Sustain. 6, 4246–4272 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074246
Guan, C.: Spatial metrics of urban form: measuring compact cities in China. Vertical Urbanism 2018, 189–209 (2017)
Clifton, K., Ewing, R., Knaap, G.J., Song, Y.: Quantitative analysis of urban form: a multidisciplinary review. J. Urban. Int. Res. Placemaking Urban Sustain. 1(1), 17–45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/17549170801903496
Abdullahi, S., Pradhan, B., Jebur, M.N.: GIS-based sustainable city compactness assessment using integration of MCDM, Bayes theorem and RADAR technology. Geocarto Int. 30(4), 365–387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.911967
Ogrodonik, K.: Indicators of the compact city concept—necessary data and the possibility of application. Archit. Civ. Eng. Environ. 12(4), 23–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2019-049
Mardiah, W.M.R.W.N.: Compact urban form for sociability in urban neighbourhoods. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 5(10), 822–826 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2015.v5.564
Nam, K., Lim, U., Kim, B.H.S.: ‘Compact’ or ‘Sprawl’ for sustainable urban form? Measuring the effect on travel behavior in Korea. Ann. Reg. Sci. 49, 157–173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0443-7
Dieleman, F.M., Dijst, M., Burghouwt, G.: Urban form and travel behaviour: micro-level household attributes and residential context. Urban Stud. 39(3), 507–527 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220112801
Coorey, S.B.A., Lau, S.S.Y.: Urban compactness and its progress toward sustainability: the Hong Kong scenario. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 1(87), 87–97 (2005)
Miller, E.J., Ibrahim, A.: Urban form and vehicular travel: some empirical findings. Transp. Res. Rec. 1617, 18–27 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3141/1617-03
Liaqat, H., Waheed, A., Malik, N.A., Vohra, I.A.: Measuring urban sustainability through compact city approach: a case study of Lahore. J. Sustain. Dev. Stud. 10(2), 61–81 (2017)
Lee, J., Kurisu, K., An, K., Hanaki, K.: Development of the compact city index and its application to Japanese cities. Urban Stud. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014536786
Kang, J.E., Yoon, D.K., Bae, H.J.: Evaluating the effect of compact urban form on air quality in Korea. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317705880
Ahlfeldt, G., Pietrostefani, E.: Demystifying Compact Urban Growth: Evidence From 300 Studies From Across the World (2017) (Online). Available: http://newclimateeconomy.net/content/cities-working-papers.%0Anewclimateeconomy.net/content/cities-working-papers
Shirazi, M.R.: Compact urban form: neighbouring and social activity. Sustain. 12(5) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051987
Zhao, F., Tang, L., Qiu, Q., Wu, G.: The compactness of spatial structure in Chinese cities: measurement, clustering patterns and influencing factors. Ecosyst. Heal. Sustain. 6(1) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2020.1743763
Institut national de santé publique du Québec.: Geographical Indicators of the Built Environment and Services Environment Influencing Physical Activity, Diet and Body Weight (2010)
Koohsari, M.J., Oka, K., Owen, N., Sugiyama, T.: Natural movement: a space syntax theory linking urban form and function with walking for transport. Heal. Place 58(102072) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.002
Dettlaff, W.: Space syntax analysis—methodology of understanding the space. PhD Interdiscip. J., p. 8 (2014)
Moura, F., Cambra, P., Gonçalves, A.B.: Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: a case study in Lisbon. Landsc. Urban Plan. 157, 282–296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
Dörrzapf, L., Kovács-Győri, A., Resch, B., Zeile, P.: Defining and assessing walkability: a concept for an integrated approach using surveys, biosensors and geospatial analysis. Urban Dev. Issues 62, 5–15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2478/udi-2019-0008
Lee, S., Talen, E.: Measuring walkability: a note on auditing methods. J. Urban Des. 19(3), 368–388 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.890040
Report, T.S., Zealanders, N.: Soc. Rep. 2010, 4–9 (2010)
Rice, J.C., Rochet, M.J.: A framework for selecting a suite of indicators for fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62(3), 516–527 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icesjms.2005.01.003
Brown, D.: Good Practice Guidelines for Indicator Development and Reporting. Busan, Korea (2009) (Online). Available: http://www.oecd.org/site/progresskorea/43586563.pdf
Moore, G.H.: Criteria for selecting indicators. In: Statistical Indicators of Cyclical Revivals and Recessions, pp. 20–31 (1950)
Macdonald, G.: Criteria for Selection of High-Performing Indicators: A Checklist to Inform Monitoring and Evaluation (2016) (Online). Available: https://www.wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u350/2014/Indicator_checklist.pdf
Selection of Indicators.: Measure Evaluation (2020). https://www.measureevaluation.org/prh/rh_indicators/overview/rationale2
Cooper, C., Chiaradia, A., Webster, C.: Spatial Design Network Analysis software, version 3.3. Cardiff University (2016) (Online). Available: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/sdna/
Jiang, B.: Axwoman 6.3: An ArcGIS Extension for Urban Morphological Analysis. University of Gävle, Sweden (2015) (Online). Available: http://giscience.hig.se/binjiang/Axwoman/
depthmapX development team.: depthmapX (Version 0.6.0) (Computer software) (2017)
Lefebvre-Ropars, G., Morency, C.: Walkability: which measure to choose, where to measure it, and how? Transp. Res. Rec. 2672(35), 139–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118787095
Kaza, N.: Landscape shape adjusted compactness index for urban areas. GeoJournal 9, 2020 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10262-9
Li, W., Goodchild, M.F., Church, R.: An efficient measure of compactness for two-dimensional shapes and its application in regionalization problems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 27(6), 1227–1250 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.752093
Angel, S., Arango Franco, S., Liu, Y., Blei, A.M.: The shape compactness of urban footprints. Prog. Plann. 139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.12.001
Angel, S., Franco, S.A., Liu, Y., Alejandro, M.B., Zhang, X.: The Shape Compactness of Urban Extents (2018)
Montero, R.S., Bribiesca, E.: State of the art of compactness and circularity measures. In: International Mathematical Forum, vol. 4(27), pp. 1305–1335 (2009) (Online). Available: http://www.m-hikari.com/imf-password2009/25-28-2009/bribiescaIMF25-28-2009.pdf
Angel, S., Parent, J., Civco, D.L.: Ten compactness properties of circles: measuring shape in geography. Can. Geogr. 54(4), 441–461 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0064.2009.00304.x
Huang, J., Lu, X.X., Sellers, J.M.: A global comparative analysis of urban form: applying spatial metrics and remote sensing. Landsc. Urban Plan. 82, 184–197 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.010
Frank, L.D., Schmid, T.L., Sallis, J.F., Chapman, J., Saelens, B.E.: Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. Am. J. Prev. Med. 28(2 SUPPL. 2), 117–125 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001
Song, Y., Merlin, L., Rodriguez, D.: Comparing measures of urban land use mix. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 42, 1–13 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.08.001
Manaugh, K., Kreider, T.: What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix. J. Transp. Land Use 6(1), 63–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v6i1.291
Mavoa, S., et al.: Identifying appropriate land-use mix measures for use in a national walkability index. J. Transp. Land Use 11(1), 681–700 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1132
Zagorskas, J.: GIS-based modelling and estimation of land use mix in urban environment 2 problem formulation. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 1, 284–293 (2016)
Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., Bedford, M.: Space syntax. Environ. Plan. B 3, 147–185 (1976)
Telega, A.: Urban street network analysis using space syntax in GIS-Cracow case study. In: Proceedings - 2016 Baltic Geodetic Congress (Geomatics), BGC Geomatics 2016, pp. 282–287 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/BGC.Geomatics.2016.57
Esposito, D., Santoro, S., Camarda, D.: Agent-based analysis of urban spaces using space syntax and spatial cognition approaches: a case study in Bari, Italy. Sustainability 12(4625) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114625
Bafna, S.: Space syntax: a brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environ. Behav. 35(1), 17–29 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238863
Lee, S., Seo, K.W.: Combining space syntax with GIS-based built environment measures in pedestrian walking activity. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium (2013)
Acknowledgements
Authors thank the editors and reviewers for their valuable comments. This study was undertaken with the constant research support of the Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD), Government of India.
Statements and Declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dhingra, M., Chattopadhyay, S. (2022). Geo-spatial Assessment of Inherent Smart Urban Attributes of Traditional Neighborhood-Level Communities in India. In: Patnaik, S., Sen, S., Ghosh, S. (eds) Smart Cities and Smart Communities. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 294. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1146-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1146-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1145-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1146-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)