Abstract
The structures are designed for a much lower force than maximum force if the structure remains elastic, with the expectation of the building undergoing damage in case of strong shaking, ductility will play a major factor in post-yield behavior. Current equivalent static method in Indian Seismic code uses response reduction factor based on building system for calculating seismic horizontal coefficient which integrates with a total weight of building to give design force as output. The performance-based plastic design method directly accounts for the inelastic behavior of structure, thus eliminating any post-assessment or iteration after the initial design. Two model frames, 4 and 8 stories, are designed based on equivalent static method IS 1893 Part 1 (2016) and performance-based plastic design. The evaluation of this model is extensively done by nonlinear static pushover analysis. By comparing the results, the incorporation of inelastic behavior shows a higher response reduction factor concerning the factor given by the Indian Seismic code as per different building structures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chaulagain, H., Rodrigues, H., Spacone, E., Guragain, R., Mallik, R., & Varum, H. (2014). Response reduction factor of irregular RC buildings in Kathmandu valley. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13, 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0255-8
CEN. (2004a). European standard EN 1998–1:2004. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels.
IS 1893:2016. Indian Standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures.
Ozhendekci, D., Ozhendekci, N., & Ozturk, A. (2006). The seismic response modification factor for eccentrically braced frames, 1st ECEES, Geneva.
Patel, B., & Shah, D. (2010). Formulation of response reduction factor for RC framed staging of elevated water tank using static pushover analysis. Proceeding of the World Congress on Engineering.
Bourahla, N. (2015). Seismic accidental eccentricity: Origins, effects and evaluation.
ATC 19. (1995). Seismic response modification factors. Applied Technical Council, California Seismic Safety Commission.
Fajfar, P. (1999). Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structuaral Dynamic, 28, 979–993.
Newmark, N. M., & Hall, W. J. (1973). Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities. Report No 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce.
Paulay, T., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1992). Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Wiley Interscience.
Leelataviwat, S., Goel, S., & Stojadinovic, B. (2002). Energy-based seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift. Journal of Structural Engineering-ASCE, 128. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1046)
Housner, G. W. (1956). Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes. Proceedings of World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 5, 1–11.
Lee, S.-S., & Goel, S. C. (2001). Performance-based design of steel moment frames using target drift and yield mechanism. Research Report No. UMCEE 01-17, Dept. of Civil and Envr. Eng., University of Michigan.
Qammer, S., Dalal, S., & Dalal, P. (2018). Seismic performance evaluation of RC frames designed by PBPD method attuned with Indian code of practice.
FEMA 440 Improvement in nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. (2005). Federal Emergency Management Agency.
Goel, R. K., & Chopra, A. K. (2001). A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for buildings: Theory and implementation. Report No. PEER-2001/03, Pacific Earthquake Research Center, University of California.
Shukla, K. P., & Dalal, S. P. (2017). Evaluation of response reduction factor of a reinforced cement concrete building designed by performance-based plastic design method and limit state design method. Procedia Engineering, 173, 1854–1861. ISSN 1877-7058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.235.
ATC. (1995a). Structural response modification factors. ATC-19 Report. Applied Technology Council.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thakur, A.S., Gupta, T. (2023). Assessment of Response Reduction Factor for Ordinary RC Frames by IS Code and PSPD Method. In: Hau, K.K., Gupta, A.K., Chaudhary, S., Gupta, T. (eds) Recent Advances in Structural Engineering and Construction Management . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 277. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4040-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4040-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4039-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4040-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)