Abstract
The discourse of world class universities has very recently swept the Indian higher education policy, a concept which has been burgeoning globally for quite some time now. A world-class university is the one which is held to be amongst the best in the world; it is ideally premised on academic freedom and displays high-quality output. What underlies this quest for achieving world-class status is competitiveness amongst the universities, inside the country and also with universities globally. There is always a comparison between universities and thus the ranking discourse is rendered legitimacy.
The paper tries to address two related and consecutive objectives. The first is to understand the concept (and nature) of competition as would ensue between universities in applying for world-class status. The competition would exclude many universities not well equipped. With competition being restricted to only a few universities, the second objective would be to look at what kind of efficient practices pertaining to dynamic efficiency, internal efficiency and allocative efficiency would possibly take place, as the potential universities compete. The paper concludes by highlighting the contradiction between the pursuit of efficiency and academic freedom on the one hand and quality on the other, the two crucial pillars for a university to emerge as world class.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Section “What is a world-class university?” discusses in detail the features of a world-class university.
- 2.
As cited in Shattock (2017)
- 3.
- 4.
Until 2016, any university which scored between 3.01 and 4 used to get an A grade. Since 2016, this range has been divided into three: A++ for a score between 3.51 and 4, A+ for a score between 3.26 and 3.50 and A for a score between 3.01 and 3.25.
- 5.
New Public Management is a management practice which is premised on marketisation, privatisation, performance based accountability, managerialism and contractual relations.
- 6.
While the 90% weightage is given to indicators directly related to research outcomes, the remaining 10% is given to the indicator ‘Per Capita Academic Performance’, which is calculated by dividing the weighted scores of all other indicators by the number of full-time equivalent academic staff. This indicator also, therefore, depends on the research performance of the university.
- 7.
The extent of publicness or privateness
- 8.
There are specific indicators to this effect in NIRF and QS ranking.
References
Altbach, P. G. (2015). The cost and benefits of world class universities. International higher education, 5–8. Retrieved from https://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ihe/article/viewFile/7381/6578.
Altbach, P. G., & Balan, G. (2007). Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America world class worldwide. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.
Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence. In The making of world-class research universities. Washington DC: World Bank.
Ball, S. J. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301.
Doherty, R. (2007). Critically framing education policy: Foucault, discourse and governmentality. In M. A. Peters & T. Besley (Eds.), Why Foucault? New directions in educational research. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
Foucault, M. (1980). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge. Selected interviews and other writings (pp. 1972–1977). Great Britain: Harvester Press Limited.
Glennester, H. (1991). Quasi market for education. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1268–1276.
Government of India. (2016a). National Institutional Ranking Framework. A methodology for ranking of universities and colleges in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.
Government of India. (2016b). UGC (world class institutions deemed to be universities) regulations (p. 2016). New Delhi: UGC.
Government of India. (2017). National Institutional Ranking Framework. A methodology for ranking of universities and colleges in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.
Green, D. (1994). What is quality in higher education? Concepts, policy and practice. In D. Green (Ed.), What is quality in higher education? (pp. 13–30). Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
Jongbloed, B. (2004). Regulation and competition in higher education. In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in Higher Education: Rhetoric or reality. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kumar, T. R. (2015). World class universities: Indian experiment. Economic and Political Weekly, 159(48), 36–40.
Lockheed, M. E. & Eric Hanushek. (1994). Concepts of educational efficiency and effectiveness. Working Paper, US: World Bank.
Majumdar, T. (1983). Investment in education and social choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marginson, S. (2007). Are neo-liberal reforms friendly to academic creativity? Paper presented at the University of Melbourne Seminar ‘Ideas and Issues in higher education’, Centre for Study of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.189.5354&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(4), 411–433.
Marginson, S. (2014). University ranking and social science. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 45–59.
Massy, W. (2004). Markets in higher education: Do they promote internal efficiency? In P. Teixeira, B. Jongbloed, D. Dill, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research (pp. 297–306). Rand Corporation. Retrieved from http://cstpr.colorado.edu/students/envs_5100/nelson_1959.pdf.
Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: From the free market to knowledge capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.
Patnaik, P. (2007). Alternative perspectives on higher education. Social Scientist, 35(11/12), 3–14.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalising education policy. London/New York: Routledge.
Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world class universities. Washington DC: World Bank.
Shattock, M. (2017). The world class university and international ranking systems: What are the policy implications for governments and institutions? Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1(1), 4–12.
Sporn, B. (2007). Governance and administration: Organisational and structural trends. In J. J. F. Forest & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education, part one: Global themes and contemporary challenges (pp. 141–157). Dordrecht: Springer.
Tam, M. (2001). Measuring quality and performance in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1), 47–54.
Toonen, T. (2007). Public sector reform in the knowledge based economy. In J. Enders & B. Jongloed (Eds.), Public-private dynamics in higher education. Bielefeld: Transaction Publishers.
Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 13–36.
Winston, G. C. (2000). Positional arms race in higher education. WPEHE paper series. Williams College.
Websites
https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/education/six-universities-granted-institute-of-eminence-status/article24370554.ece
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharma, A. (2019). The World-Class University Discourse: Disentangling the Conflict Between Efficiency and World Class-Ness. In: Bhushan, S. (eds) The Future of Higher Education in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9061-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9061-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9060-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9061-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)