Skip to main content

Expressive Syntactic Devices as Means of Forming Advertising Discourse

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics

Abstract

Advertising, as no other professional discourse type, presupposes extensive use of expressive linguistic means specially designed for producing emotional effects on the addressee. This research proceeds the premise that the language expressive function, as the ability to reflect human emotions, subjective perception and attitude to the denoted issues, is actualised not only in lexical, but also in speech structural forms. Hence, the purpose of the article is to sort out and analyse the expressive potential of syntactic means in building up advertising texts, since it focuses on rhetorical influence on the recipient, which attributes discursive features to advertisements. Texts of different volumes are taken to exemplify the significance of expressive syntax in advertising, and direct correlation between text sizes and syntactic expressive means saturation is revealed with methods of functional linguistics and quantitative analysis. The corpus of syntactic devices under analysis includes various structural sentences types, parentheses, syntactic parallelism and repetitions, parcelling and other constructions. The authors conclude that the specific advertising discourse feature lies in the possibility for expressive syntactic means to grow into stylistic and pragmatic devices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullah, M., Sudhakar, B. D., & Rahman, M. S. (2016). Brand positioning constructs and indicators for measurement of consumer’s positive psychology toward brands. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, Puducherry, 7(1), 124–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhmanova, O. (2005). Dictionary of linguistic terms. Moscow: YURSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrova, O. (1984). The expressive syntax issues. Moscow: Vysshaya shcola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrova, O. (2000). The language cognitive function in the view of the functional approach. Cognitive Features of Language Categorization, 151–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aleksandrova, O., Mendzheritskaya, E., & Malakhova, V. (2017). Dynamic changes in modern English discourse. Training Language and Culture, 1(1), 100–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, I. (2002). Stylistics. Modern English. Moscow: Flinta, Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bally, Ch. (1965). Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Quatrième édition revue et corrigée. Bern: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkhudarov, L. (1966). The structure of a simple sentence in the modern English language. Moscow: Vysshaya schola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beregovskaya, E. (2004). Essays on expressive syntax. Moscow: Rokhos. Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergs, A. (2008). Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2005). English grammar. Theory. Moscow: Vysshaya shcola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobee, C., & Arens, W. (2003). Contemporary advertising. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkova, T. (2002). The issue of ellipsis sentences in linguistics, theoretical and practical aspects of linguistics and linguodidactics. Surgut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (2010). The role of syntactic structure in guiding prosody perception with ordinary listeners and everyday speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(7–9), 1141–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degan, L., & Fagard, B. (2011). Alors between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language, 18(1), 19–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delin, J. (2000). The language of everyday life: An introduction. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrey, A. (1998). How to produce successful advertising. New York: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, A. (2002). The language of advertising. Written texts. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneberg, S., & O’Shaughnessy, N. (2007). Theory and concept in political marketing: Issues and an Agenda. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2/3), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilyish, B. (1971). The system of modern English language. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaysingle, L., & Ritson, M. (2013). Everyday advertising context: An ethnography of advertising response in the family living room. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, O. (1984). Analytical syntax. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, G., & Lee, J.-H. (2011). The effect of search condition and advertising type on visual attention to internet advertising. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(5), 323–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.-B., & Sells, P. (2011). The big mess construction: interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics, 15, 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiseleva, A. (2017). Modern trends and prospects of the English language development. In Conference proceedings of 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM. Science and Society (Book 3) (Vol. 2, pp. 849–856). Albena, Bulgaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrina, N., Boldyrev, N., & Hydyakov, A. (2002). Theoretical grammar of the English language. Moscow: Vesshaya Schola.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, S. (2018). Advertising as specific discourse type: ontology and functional pragmatics. In SGEM2018 Vienna Art Conference Proceedings of 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM 2018, www.sgemvienna.org (Vol. 5, Issue 3.1, pp. 3–10). https://doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2018h/31/s10.001.

  • Leech, G. (1966). English in advertising. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustrer, L. (1986). Types of nomination as a means of expressive syntax. Imagery and Expressive Means of Language, 117–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, P. (2007). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, L. (2017). The language of magazines. Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokshantsev, R. (2009). Psychology of marketing. Moscow, Novosibirsk: Infra-M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neeta, P., Kimberly, Y., & James, M. (2013). Selection of neighborhood controls for a population-based Lyme disease case-control study by using a commercial marketing database. American Journal of Epidemiology, 178(2), 276–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prado-Alonso, C. (2015). The “as be the case” construction. English Studies, 96(6), 690–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). Comprehensive grammar of the English language. London, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D., & Telenkova, M. (1985). Reference dictionary on linguistic terms. Moscow: Prosvesheniye.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M. (1987). Advertising from fundamentals to strategies. Toronto: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romat, Eu., & Senderov, D. (2016). Marketing. Practical theory. St.-Petersburg: Piter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C., & Warren, W. (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tošović, B. (2006). Expressive syntax of the Russian and Serbian/Croatian languages. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troshina, N. (2011). Text models in advertising discourse. In N. N. Troshina (Ed.), Advertising communication. Linguocultural aspect (pp. 27–40). Moscow: INION RAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchenova, V. (2003). Philosophy of advertising. Moscow: Gella-print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valgina, N. (2003). The theory of text. Moscow: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, V. (1980). The style of the “Queen of Spades”. On the language of artistic prose. Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinogradov, A. (1981). To the question of differentiation between parcelling and dynamic addition. The Issues of Linguistics, 3, 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga V. Aleksandrova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aleksandrova, O.V., Korableva, E.A., Kharkovskaya, A.A. (2020). Expressive Syntactic Devices as Means of Forming Advertising Discourse. In: Malyuga, E. (eds) Functional Approach to Professional Discourse Exploration in Linguistics . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9103-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9102-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9103-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics