Skip to main content

On the notion of uncertain belief revision systems

  • 4. Non-Monotonic Reasoning
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases (IPMU 1990)

Abstract

The notion of uncertain belief revision systems (UBRS) is introduced as an extension of assumption-based truth maintenance systems (ATMS) to a many valued logic.

In this framework, some results relative to the many-valued implication pq equivalent to notpvq are considered.

Problems arising when different implication functions are defined in many valued logic are then discussed and some steps of a research development are described.

This paper has been supported by C.N.R. through P.F. Robotica-contratto di ricerca No 89.00556.67.

A partial support by: M.U.R.S.T.-40%, "Tecniche di ragionamento automatico in sistemi intelligenti" is also acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bobrow D.G. & Hayes P.J. (eds) (1985), A.I. — Where Are We?, Artificial Intelligence 25, 375–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.L. Brown, D.E. Gaucas, D. Benanav (1987), An Algebraic Foundation for Truth Maintenance, Proc. 10th IJCAI, Milano, 973–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J.(1979), A Truth Maintenance System, Artificial Intelligence 12, pp. 231–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer J. (1986a), An Assumption-based TMS. Artificial Intelligence 28, pp. 127–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Kleer J. (1986b), Problem solving with the ATMS. Artificial Intelligence 28, pp. 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee R.C.T.(1972), Fuzzy Logic and the Resolution Principle, Journal of A.C.M. 19, 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukaidono M. (1982), Fuzzy Inference of resolution style, in "Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory", R.R. Yager (ed), Pergamon Press, New York, 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukaidono M. et al. (1989), Fundamentals of Fuzzy Prolog, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 3, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinfrank M., de Kleer J., M.L. Ginzberg, E. Sandewall (Eds) (1989), Nonmonotonic reasoning, Springer Lecture Notes in A.I., vol. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiter R. (1987), Nonmonotonic reasoning, Ann. Rev. Comput. Sci. 2, pp. 147–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomaa A. (1959), On many valued systems of Logic, Ajatus XXII, 115–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trillas E. & Valverde L. (1984), On Implication and Indistinguishability in the Setting of Fuzzy Logic, in Kacprzyk & Yager (eds), Management Decision Support Systems using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory, Verlag TUV.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Bernadette Bouchon-Meunier Ronald R. Yager Lotfi A. Zadeh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernasconi, C., Rivoira, S., Termini, S. (1991). On the notion of uncertain belief revision systems. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds) Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases. IPMU 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 521. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028108

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0028108

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47580-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics