Skip to main content

Using domain information during the learning of a subsequential transducer

  • Session: Operational Issues
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Grammatical Interference: Learning Syntax from Sentences (ICGI 1996)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1147))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The recently proposed OSTI algorithm allows for the identification of subsequential functions from input-output pairs. However, if the target is a partial function the convergence is not guaranteed. In this work, we extend the algorithm in order to allow for the identification of any partial subsequential function provided that either a negative sample or a description of the domain by means of a deterministic finite automaton is available.

This work has been partially supported by the Spanish CICYT under contract TIC93-0633-C02 & TIC95-0984-C02-01

Miguel A. Varó is supported by a postgraduate grant from the Generalitat Valenciana (local government)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D. Angluin, “Inference of Reversible Languages”. J. ACM 29, 741–765 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Angluin, C. H. Smith. “Inductive inference: theory and methods”. Computing Surveys, 15, 237–269 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Berstel. Transductions and Context-Free Languages. Teubner, Stuttgart (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Castellanos, I. Galiano, E. Vidal. “Application of OSTIA to Machine translation Tasks”. Grammatical Inference and Applications. 2nd International Colloquium on Grammatical Inference. R.C. Carrasco and J. Oncina eds. El Campello (Spain) (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. M. Gold. “Language identification in the limit”. Information and Control, 10, 447–474 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. M. Gold. “Complexity of automaton identification from given data”. Information and Control, 37, 302–320 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. García, E. Vidal, J. Oncina. “Learning Locally Testable Languages in the Strict Sense”, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Algorithmic Learning Theory, Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 325–337 (October 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. García, E. Vidal. “Inference of k-Testable Languages in the Strict Sense and application to Syntactic Pattern Recognition”. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 920–925 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Luneau, M. Richetin, C. Cayla. “Sequential learning from input-output behavior”, Robotica, 1, 151–159 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Miclet. “Regular Inference with a Tail-Clustering Method”, IEEE Trans., SMC-10, 737–743 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Oncina. “Aprendizaje de lenguajes regulares y funciones subsecuenciales”. Ph. D. dissertation, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Oncina, P. García. “Inductive learning of subsequential functions”. Univ. Politécnica de Valencia, Tech. Rep. DSIC II 31 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Oncina, P. García, E. Vidal. “Learning Subsequential Transducers for Pattern Recognition Interpretation Tasks”. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15, 448–458 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Oncina, A. Castellanos, E. Vidal, V. M. Jiménez. “Corpus based machine translation through subsequential transducers”. Proceedings of the 3rd. International Conference on the Cognitive Science of Natural Language Processing, Dublin (July 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Takada, “Grammatical inference for even linear languages based on control sets”, Inform. Processing Lett., 28, no.4, 193–199 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Varó. “Inferencia de Transductores Subsecuenciales con Información de Dominio y Rango” (in Spanish). Final year project supervised by J. Oncina. Facultad de Informática, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. P. J. Velenturf. “Inference of sequential machines from sample computation,” IEEE Trans. Comput., 27, 167–170 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Vidal, P. García, E. Segarra, “Inductive learning of finte-state transducers for the interpretation of unidimensional objects”, Structural Pattern Analysis. R. Mohr, T.Pavlidis and A. San Feliu eds. New York: World Scientific, 17–35 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Laurent Miclet Colin de la Higuera

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Oncina, J., Varó, M.A. (1996). Using domain information during the learning of a subsequential transducer. In: Miclet, L., de la Higuera, C. (eds) Grammatical Interference: Learning Syntax from Sentences. ICGI 1996. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1147. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0033364

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0033364

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61778-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70678-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics