Skip to main content

Judicial Opinions and the Legal Profession

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ghostwriting and the Ethics of Authenticity
  • 605 Accesses

Abstract

Knapp and Hulbert describe ghostwriting in two critical legal arenas: judicial opinions and lawyer-written materials for indigent clients. The authors first explore the complex world of judicial opinion writing, focusing primarily on the use of law clerks to pen opinions for US Supreme Court justices. Then the focus shifts to lawyers who provide unacknowledged legal assistance to clients who cannot otherwise afford it, emphasizing how legal precedent and professional ethics govern such support. The authors conclude by offering reflections on the practice of ghostwriting in the judicial and legal context through the lens of the ethical framework introduced in Chap. 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knapp, J.C., Hulbert, A.M. (2017). Judicial Opinions and the Legal Profession . In: Ghostwriting and the Ethics of Authenticity. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-31313-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics