Abstract
The chapter illuminates some of the under-explored relational aspects of (Im)politeness in interpersonal pragmatics. It consists of two case studies explicating how conversational participants manifest and interpret relationships in interaction. Specifically, case study 1 illustrates how reciprocity (balancing obligations) as a social norm can be used in interpreting relationality in terms of (Im)politeness. Case study 2 demonstrates how relationality is manifested in mediation interactions, where the participants evoke their interrelated relational ties and relational entitlements in order to achieve their interactional goals. The two case studies in both Japanese and Chinese, in particular, highlight the significance of studying emic concepts of relationality and related concepts, including the ‘balance sheet of obligation’ in Japanese contexts, and ‘relational ties’ and ‘relational entitlements’ in Taiwanese interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Oxford Dictionary of English, 3rd edition (2010) online. Retrieved 11 October 2015 from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/definition/english/relationship.
- 2.
Guanxi may have some negative connotations depending on the context. It may imply ‘going through the back door’. Guanxi itself, if used independently, is neutral. Renji guanxi refers to ‘interpersonal relationship’. However, in the latter phrase, the emic notions of obligation and entitlement embedded in guanxi are not necessarily implicated. For that reason we prefer to use the term guanxi.
- 3.
It should be noted that Arundale’s FCT is primarily a theory of a particular aspect of relationships/relating, not ‘face’ as it is commonly understood in the field.
- 4.
Recipient design refers to ‘a multitude of respects in which the talk by a party in a conversation is constructed or designed in ways which display an orientation and sensitivity to the particular other(s) who are the co-participants’ (Sacks et al. 1974, p. 727).
- 5.
- 6.
Key for abbreviations: Ag: agreement; Ans: answer; COP: copulative verbs; D: denial; FB: Feedback; Res: Respectful form; Hum: Humble form; IP: interactional particles; N: Nodding; Passive: passive form; P-suffix: Polite verb suffix; Q: question; Qm: question marker; SD: self denigration; Sta-V: stative verb; Tag: tag question; @: laughing.
- 7.
See Ohashi (2013) for the use of denial as a self-denigration in thanking episodes in Japanese. Self-denigration is a significant form of relational work and politic behavior in many contexts in Japanese.
- 8.
This is a count of each participant’s utterances by character as a unit.
- 9.
Transcription symbols and abbreviations used in morphological glosses (Jefferson 2004)
- (.):
-
micro-pause
- -:
-
cut-off of prior sound in a word
- underlining:
-
stressed word or part of word
- ><:
-
rushed or compressed talk
- %:
-
code-switch (between Taiwanese and Mandarin Chinese)
Abbreviations used in morphological glosses (Wu 2004)
- ASSC:
-
Associative (-de)
- CP:
-
Complement
- C:
-
Classifier
- INT:
-
Interjection
- N:
-
Negation
- PRT:
-
Particle
- Q:
-
Question marker
- 10.
Member of Legislative Council.
- 11.
MLC, member of Legislative Council.
References
Antaki, C., and S. Widdicombe. 1998. Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool. In Identities in Talk, ed. C. Antaki and S. Widdicombe, 1–14. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Arundale, R. 1999. An Alternative Model and Ideology of Communication for an Alternative to Politeness Theory. Pragmatics 9 (1): 119–154.
———. 2006. Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness. Journal of Politeness Research 2 (2): 193–216.
———. 2009. Face as Emergent in Interpersonal Communication: An Alternative to Goffman. In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh, 33–54. London: Equinox.
———. 2010a. Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2078–2105.
———. 2010b. Relating. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. M. Locher and S. Graham, 137–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
———. 2013. Conceptualising ‘Interaction’ in Interpersonal Pragmatics: Implications for Understanding and Research. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 12–26.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F. 2003. Face and Politeness: New (Insight) for (Old) Concepts. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1453–1469.
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., and M. Haugh, eds. 2009. Face, Communication and Social Interaction. London: Equinox.
Baxter, L. 2011. Discursive Struggles of Culture. In Voicing Relationships: A Dialogic Perspective, ed. L. Baxter, 47–88. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Baxter, L.A., and B.M. Montgomery. 1996. Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford.
Beebe, L., and T. Takahashi. 1989. Do You Have a Bag?: Social Status and Patterned Variation in Second Language Acquisition. In Variation in Second Language Acquisition, ed. S. Gass, C. Madden, D. Preston, and L. Selinker, 103–125. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Blum-Kulka, S., and E. Olshtain. 1984. Requests and Apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics 5: 196–213.
Blum-Kulka, S., B. Danet, and R. Gherson. 1985. The Language of Requesting in Israeli Society. In Language and Social Situations, ed. J. Forgas, 113–139. New York: Springer.
Blum-Kulka, S., J. House, and G. Kasper, eds. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood: Ablex.
Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena. In Questions and Politeness, ed. E. Goody, 56–289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bucholtz, M., and K. Hall. 2005. Identity and Interaction: A Socio-cultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies 7 (4/5): 585–614.
Chang, W.-L.M. 2016. Face and Face Practices in Chinese Talk-in-Interactions: A Study in Interactional Pragmatics. London: Equinox.
Chang, W.-L.M., and M. Haugh. 2011. The Strategic Embarrassment and Face Threatening in Business Interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2948–2963.
———. 2013. Face in Taiwanese Business Interactions: From Emic Concepts to Emic Practices. In Chinese Discourse and Interaction: Theory and Practice, ed. Y. Pan and D.Z. Kádár, 126–150. London: Equinox.
Chang, H.-C., and R. Holt. 1994. A Chinese Perspective on Face as Inter-relation Concern. In The Challenge of Facework, ed. S. Ting-Toomey, 95–132. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J., L. Marti, M. Mei, M. Nevala, and S. Gila. 2010. Cross-Cultural Variation in the Perception of Impoliteness: A Study of Impoliteness Events Reported by Students in England, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (4): 597–624.
Dunn, C. 2005. Japanese Honorific Use as Indexical of the Speaker’s Situational Stance: Towards a New Model. Texas Linguistic Forum 48, 83–92. (Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual symposium about Language and Society – Austin April 16–18, 2004).
Eelen, G. 2001. A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St.Jerome.
Enfield, N.J. 2009. Relationship Thinking and Human Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (1): 60–78.
Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Anchor Books.
———. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gouldner, A.W. 1960. The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review 25: 161–178.
Gu, Y. 1990. Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 237–257.
———. 2011. Modern Chinese Politeness Revisited. In Politeness Across Cultures, ed. F. Bargiela-Chiappini and D.Z. Kádár, 128–148. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hahn, J., and H. Hatfield. 2011. Group Face in Korea and the United States: Taking Responsibility for the Individual and the Group. Multilingua 30: 25–70.
Haugh, M. 2006. Emic Perspectives on the Positive-Negative Politeness Distinction. Culture, Language and Representation 3: 17–26.
———. 2007. The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Theory: An Interactional Alternative. Journal of Politeness Research 3 (2): 295–317.
———. 2009. Face and Interaction. In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh, 1–30. London: Equinox.
———. 2010. Jocular Mockery, (Dis)affiliation, and Face. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2106–2119.
———. 2013. Disentangling Face, Facework and Im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics 1: 46–73.
Haugh, M., and F. Bargiela-Chiappini. 2010. Face in Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2073–2077.
Haugh, M., W.-L.M. Chang, and D. Kádár. 2015. “Doing Deference”: Identities and Relational Practices in Chinese Online Discussion Boards. Pragmatics 25 (1): 73–98.
He, M., and S. Zhang. 2011. Re-conceptualizing the Chinese Concept of Face from a Face-Sensitive Perspective: A Case Study of a Modern Chinese TV Drama. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2360–2372.
Hill, B., S. Ide, S. Ikuta, A. Kawasaki, and T. Ogino. 1986. Universals of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English. Journal of Pragmatics 10: 347–371.
Holmes, J. 1990. Apologies in New Zealand English. Language in Society 19: 155–199.
Holtgraves, T., and J.-N. Yang. 1990. Politeness as Universal: Cross-Cultural Perceptions of Request Strategies and Inferences Based on Their Use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 (4): 719–729.
Holtgraves, T., T. Srull, and D. Socall. 1989. Conversation Memory: The Effects of Speaker Status on Memory for the Assertiveness of Conversation Remarks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (2): 149–160.
Hsiang, T.C. 1974. Research on Chinese Characteristics. Taipei: Shang-wu Publishing Company.
Ide, S. 1989. Formal Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic Politeness. Multilingua 8 (2–3): 223–248.
Işik-Gűler, H., and Ş. Ruhi. 2010. Face and Impoliteness at the Intersection with Emotions: A Corpus Based Study in Turkish. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (4): 625–660.
Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. G. Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kádár, D. 2007. Terms of (Im)politeness. A Study of the Communicational Properties of Traditional Chinese (Im)polite Terms of Address. Budapest: Eötvös Loránd University Press.
Kádár, D., and M. Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kiesling, S. 2013. Constructing Identity. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. J.K. Chambers and N. Schilling, 2nd ed., 448–467. New York: John Willey & Sons.
Langlotz, A., and M. Locher. 2013. The Role of Emotions in Relational Work. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 87–107.
Lim, T.-S., and J. Bowers. 1991. Facework, Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact. Human Communication Research 17 (3): 415–450.
Locher, M. 2008. Relational Work, Politeness, and Identity Construction. In Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, ed. G. Antos and E. Ventola, 509–540. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, M., and S. Graham. 2010. Introduction to Interpersonal Pragmatics. In Interpersonal Pragmatics, ed. M. Locher and S. Graham, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton.
Locher, M., and R. Watts. 2005. Politeness Theory and Relational Work. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 9–33.
———. 2008. Relational Work and Impoliteness: Negotiating Norms of Linguistic Behavior. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, Language, Power and Social Process 21, ed. D. Bousfield and M. Locher, 77–99. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mao, L.R. 1994. Beyond Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed. Journal of Pragmatics 21: 451–486.
Matsumoto, Y. 1988. Reexamination of the Universality of Face: Politeness Phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 403–426.
———. 1989. Politeness and Conversational Universals – Observation from Japanese. Multilingua 8: 207–221.
Mills, S. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ohashi, J. 2013. Thanking and Politeness in Japanese: Balancing Acts in Interaction. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Olshtain, E. 1989. Apologies Across Languages. In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, ed. S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, and G. Kasper, 155–173. Norwood: Ablex.
Olshtain, E., and A. Cohen. 1983. Apology: A Speech-Act Set. In Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition, ed. N. Wolfson and E. Judd, 18–35. Rowley: Newbury House.
Pan, Y., and D.Z. Kádár. 2010. Politeness in Historical and Contemporary Chinese. London: Continuum.
Pilgrim, R. 1986. Intervals (“Ma”) in Space and Time: Foundations for a Religio-Aesthetic Paradigm in Japan. History of Religions 25 (3): 255–277.
Ruhi, Ş. 2007. Higher-Order Intentions and Self-Politeness in Evaluations of (Im)politeness: The Relevance of Compliment Responses. Australian Journal of Linguistics 27: 107–145.
———. 2009a. A Place for Emotions in Conceptualizing Face and Relational Work. Paper Presented at the International Symposium on Face and Politeness, Griffith University, Brisbane, 10 July 2009.
———. 2009b. Evoking Face in Self and Other-Presentation in Turkish. In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh, 155–174. London: Equinox.
Sacks, H., E. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Spencer-Oatey, H. 2000. Rapport Management: A Framework for Analysis. In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport Through Talk Across Cultures, ed. H. Spencer-Oatey, 11–46. London: Continuum.
———. 2002. Managing Rapport in Talk: Using Rapport Sensitive Incidents to Explore the Motivational Concerns Underlying the Management of Relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 529–525.
———. 2005. (Im)politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging Their Bases and Interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–120.
———. 2007. Theories of Identity and the Analysis of Face. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4): 639–656.
———. 2008. Face, (Im)politeness and Rapport. In Cultural Speaking: Culture, Communicationand Social Interaction, ed. H. Spencer-Oatey, 137–154. London: Equinox.
———. 2009. Face, Identity and Interactional Goals. In Face, Communication and Social Interaction, ed. F. Bargiela-Chiappini and M. Haugh, 137–154. London: Equinox.
———. 2011. Conceptualising ‘the Relational’ in Pragmatics: Insights from Metapragmatics Emotion and (Im)politeness Comments. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3565–3578.
———. 2013. Relating at Work: Facets, Dialects and Face. Journal of Pragmatics 58: 121–137.
Su, H.-Y. 2009. Code-Switching in Managing a Face-Threatening Communicative Task: Footing and Ambiguity in Conversational Interaction in Taiwan. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 372–392.
Sung, K. 2001. Elder Respect: Exploration of Ideals and Forms in East Asia. Journal of Aging Studies 15 (1): 13–26.
Sung, K., and B. Kim. 2009. Respect for the Elderly: Implications for Human Service Providers. Lanham: University Press of America.
Watts, R. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, R.-J.R. 2004. Stance-in-Talk: A Conversation Analysis of Mandarin Final Particles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yang, P. 2007. Nonverbal Affilliative Phenomena in Mandarin Chinese Conversation. Journal of Intercultural Communication 15: 1–41.
Ye, Z.-D. 2004. Chinese Catergorization of Interpersonal Relationships and Cultural Logic of Chinese Interaction: An Indigenous Perspective. Intercultural Pragmatics 1–2: 211–230.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ohashi, J., Chang, WL.M. (2017). (Im)politeness and Relationality. In: Culpeper, J., Haugh, M., Kádár, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-37507-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-37508-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)