Skip to main content

Through a Lens of Reinterpretation: Roles in Facilitated Action Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research
  • 3587 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the roles of two unique participant groups and the reinterpretation that occurs within a facilitated action research process undertaken in regional/remote North Queensland, Australia. The chapter considers the model applied, and drawing on existing action research theories, explores the expected and unexpected roles adopted. Through a lens of “reinterpretation,” including a consideration of the work of Dorothy Heathcote and Augusto Boal, the journey of the education academic and artist practitioners is revealed. How these roles interconnected and what this means more broadly for our understanding of roles in the facilitated action research process is explored along with the need for awareness and openness for all, including the teacher practitioners .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. doi:10.1080/0965079930010102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, V. (2013). Dorothy Heathcote’s mantle of the expert approach to teaching and learning: A brief introduction. In D. Fraser, V. Aitken, & B. Whyte (Eds.), Connecting curriculum, linking learning (pp. 34–56). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research (NZCER) Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: An introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubusson, P., Ewing, R., & Hoban, G. F. (2009). Action learning in schools: Reframing teachers’ professional learning and development. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. D., Flynn, T., & Stagg-Peterson, S. (2011). Examining what we mean by collaboration in collaborative action research: A cross-case analysis. Educational Action Research, 19(4), 433–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A., & Weiss, T. (2010). Understanding change in teachers’ ways of being through collaborative action research: A cultural-historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., & Mockler, N. (2009). Teacher professional learning in an age of compliance. Rotterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, D. (1984). Subject or system. In L. Johnson & C. O’Neill (Eds.), Dorothy Heathcote: Collected writings on education and drama (pp. 61–80). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, D., & Bolton, G. (1995). Drama for learning. Portmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundert, D. (1996). Collaborating on drama and the curriculum: A site-based, peer-mediated teacher in-service project. Research in Drama Education, 1(2), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2008). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 271–330). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempe, A. (1998). Research into the continuing professional development of drama teachers. Research in Drama Education, 3(2), 254–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGill, I., & Brockband, A. (2004). The action learning handbook. New York: Routledge Farmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2005). Action research for teachers: A practical guide. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oja, S. N., & Smulyan, L. (1989). Collaborative action research: A developmental approach. Sussex: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, D. (2012). A brief biography of Augusto Boal. Retrieved from http://ptoweb.org/aboutpto/a-brief-biography-of-augusto-boal/

  • Perry, R. (2006). Enhancing the teaching of drama: School-based, needs-driven professional learning. Retrieved from https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/research/handle/2100/1129

  • Perry, R. (2012). Facilitated action research: Enhancing the teaching of classroom drama. ALARj, 18(1), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Role. (2015). In Oxford English online dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/role

  • Roy, D., Baker, W., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Teaching the arts. Early childhood and primary education. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B. (2013). Agency through action research: Constructing active identities from theoretical models and metaphors. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 370–380). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somers, J., & Sikorova, E. (2002). The effectiveness of one in-service education of teachers course for influencing teachers’ practice. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(1), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, E. T. (1999). Action research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, W. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1997). Introduction: Explorations and discoveries. In W. G. Tierney & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. vii–xvi). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, ‘How do I improve my practice?’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, S., Watson, J., & Paterson, M. (2004). Self-study in professional practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 273–312). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perry, R., McGarry, T. (2017). Through a Lens of Reinterpretation: Roles in Facilitated Action Research. In: Rowell, L., Bruce, C., Shosh, J., Riel, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44108-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40523-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics