Skip to main content

Theatre in a Box: Affect and Narcissism in Ray Lee’s Cold Storage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond Immersive Theatre
  • 1416 Accesses

Abstract

Alston explores what he calls ‘narcissistic participation’ as a key feature of an audience’s productive engagement in immersive theatre. He takes as a case study Ray Lee’s Cold Storage (2011), a headphone performance for an audience of one to be experienced whilst shut inside a very small and very cold box. Through a critical analysis of Cold Storage informed by affect studies, he identifies the production and experience of affect as important aesthetic features of an immersive theatre aesthetic that preclude disinterest. Alston reflects on the biopolitical ramifications that accompany these features by considering immaterial production in the neoliberal economy, along with the cultural resonances of narcissistic participation, revealing the close imbrication of aesthetics and politics while immersed in the box’s interior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For neurologist Antonio Damasio, in Descartes’ Error, the brain and body are thought of as indissociable, ‘integrated by means of mutually interactive biochemical and neural regulatory circuits (including endocrine, immune, and autonomic neural components)’ (Damasio, 1994, p. xxvii). This perspective participates in recent theoretical shifts toward the embodied mind thesis (see Lakoff & Johnson, 1999, pp. 37–8; Johnson, 1987, p. xiii; Johnson, 2007, p. 1).

  2. 2.

    See also Damasio’s notion of the somatic-marker hypothesis. For Damasio, emotion relates to embodied learning stretching as much into the past as the present. It also relates to processes of cognition and evaluation that are marked by it (Damasio, 1994, p. 173; see also pp. 185, 196). This latter is what Damasio dubs the ‘somatic-marker hypothesis’: a technical term that usefully adds to Arnold’s notion of affective memory. Damasio’s somatic-marker hypothesis looks at how a feeling body affects cognition (Damasio, 1994, p. 173). Damasio’s research, then, suggests that emotion impacts on what we think, how we think and consequently how we think of ourselves.

  3. 3.

    Fried is here addressing minimalist artist Tony Smith’s recollection of a car journey, in which Smith describes his aesthetic experience of the world outside his car. The implication that arises from Fried’s analysis of Smith’s recollection is that the objectification of experience is also applicable to literalist art.

  4. 4.

    For recent contestations of this formulation, see Gebauer et al. (2012).

  5. 5.

    Theatre researchers and neuroscientists have explored how mimicking emotional expression can produce emotion in the actor, spawning a branch of actor training that uses the performance of emotion to induce affect (see Bloch, 1993; Rix, 1993). This takes Diderot’s advice to the actor and turns it on its head, collapsing the distance between emotional display and feeling an emotion.

  6. 6.

    This is not to be confused with the subject of Colin Radford’s bewilderment in his article, ‘How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina’. For Radford, being moved to tears by the fate of a fictional character is incoherent (Radford & Weston, 1975, p. 78). My focus here, in contrast, is not so much on what might move an audience, but the movement itself: that is, the state of being affected in the theatre, as a state that becomes aestheticised.

References

  • Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. (2013). Aesthetic theory. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alston, A. (2012). Reflections on intimacy and narcissism in Ontroerend Goed’s Personal Trilogy. Performing Ethos, 3(2), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston, A. (2013, June). Audience participation and neoliberal value: Risk, agency and responsibility in immersive theatre. Performance Research, 18(2), 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. B. (1970). Perennial problems in the field of emotion. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), Feelings and emotions: The Loyola symposium (pp. 169–185). New York: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. (2003). The aesthetic hypothesis. In C. Harrison & P. Wood (Eds.), Art in theory: 1900–2000: An anthology of changing ideas (pp. 107–110). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political economy of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S. (1997). Theatre audiences: A theory of production and reception (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, R. (2008). The actor, image, and action: Acting and cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, S. (1993, September). ALBA EMOTING: A psychophysiological technique to help actors create and control real emotions. Theatre Topics, 3(2), 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (1993, August). Atmosphere as a fundamental concept of a new aesthetics (D. Roberts, Trans.). Thesis Eleven, 36, 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, S. (2009). Authorizing the audience: The conceptual drama of Tim Crouch. Performance Research, 14(1), 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M. (2008). Introduction. In E. Fischer-Lichte (Ed.), The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics (pp. 1–10, S. I. Jain, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (2009 [1872]). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (D. W. Smith, Trans.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004 [1987]). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1968 [1637]). Discourse on method and the meditations (F. E. Sutcliffe, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Spinoza, B. (1994 [1677]). Ethics (E. Curley, Ed. & Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. (1883). The paradox of acting (W. H. Pollock, Trans.). London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchamp, M. (1973). Apropos of readymades. In M. Sanouillet & E. Peterson (Eds.), The writings of Marcel Duchamp (pp. 141–142). Marston Gate, UK: Da Ca Po Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Understanding faces and feelings. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics, (S. I. Jain, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiumara, G. C. (2001). The mind’s affective life: A psychoanalytic and philosophical inquiry. Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979 (M. Senellart (Ed.), G. Burchell, Trans.). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1968). Art and objecthood. In G. Battcock (Ed.), Minimal art: A critical anthology (pp. 116–147). Berkeley, CA: California University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (2006). On the introduction of Narcissism. In A. Phillips (Ed.), The penguin Freud reader (pp. 358–390). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Verplanken, B., & Maio, G. R.. (2012, November). Communal narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(5), 854–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2010). Breaking the silence: The hidden injuries of neo-liberal academia. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and silence in the research process: Feminist reflections (pp. 228–244). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M. (1999). Affective Labour. Boundary 2, 26(2), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Gerrod Parrott, W. (1996). Embarrassment and the threat to character. In R. Harré & W. Gerrod Parrott (Eds.), The emotions: Social, cultural and biological dimensions (pp. 39–56). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddon, D. (2008). Autobiography and performance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (2004 [1886]). Introductory lectures on aesthetics (B. Bosanquet, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling (2nd ed.). London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlcroft, L., Bore, M., & Munro, D. (2012). Three faces of Narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 274–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley, E. (2010). Theatre & feeling. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., & Webler, T. (2001). Risk, uncertainty, and rational action. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2007 [1781]). Critique of pure reason (M. Weigelt, Ed. & Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (2011). Email correspondence with the author, 28 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, A. (1968). Theory of affectivity. In M. B. Arnold (Ed.), The nature of emotion: Selected readings (pp. 37–42). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, H.-T. (2006). Postdramatic theatre (K. Jürs-Munby, Trans.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowen, A. (1985). Narcissism: Denial of the true self. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2000). Art as a social system (E. M. Knodt, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machon, J. (2009). (Syn)Aesthetics: Re defining visceral performance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machon, J. (2013). Immersive theatres: Intimacy and immediacy in contemporary performance. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Valera, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. London: Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mervant-Roux, M.-M. (2010). The Great Resonator: What historical anthropology and an ethnographic approach to the auditorium tell us about audiences (G. Casas & G. McAuley, Trans.). About Performance, 10, 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. P. (Ed.). (1986). Essential papers on Narcissism. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovid. (1986). Metamorphoses (A. D. Melville, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, C., & Weston, M. (1975). How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina. Proceedings of the Artistotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 49, 67–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2009). The emancipated spectator. In The emancipated spectator (pp. 1–23, G. Elliot, Trans.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rix, R. (1993, September). ALBA EMOTING: A preliminary experiment with emotional effector patterns. Theatre Topics, 3(2), 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, J. (1985). The player’s passion: Studies in the science of acting. London: Associated University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville, S. J. (2008). Playing with fear: Parkour and the mobility of emotion. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(8), 891–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F. (2004 [1794]). On the aesthetic education of man (R. Snell, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (1974). The fall of public man: On the social psychology of capitalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, N. (2012). Applying performance: Live art, socially engaged theatre and affective practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, A. (1987). Aesthetics: An introduction to the philosophy of art. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, P. (2002). Performing emotions: Gender, bodies, spaces in Chekhov’s drama and Stanislavski’s theatre. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect imagery consciousness: Volume 1: Positive affects. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F. (2014, Winter). Touching, flirting, whispering: Performing intimacy in public. TDR, 58(4), 56–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. (2013). Audience participation in theatre: Aesthetics of the invitation. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woolf, B. (2013). Towards a paradoxically parallaxical postdramatic politics? In K. Jürs-Munby, J. Carroll, & S. Giles (Eds.), Postdramatic theatre and the political: International perspectives on contemporary performance (pp. 31–46). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaointz, K. (2014). Narcissistic spectatorship in immersive and one-on-one performance. Theatre Journal, 66, 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alston, A. (2016). Theatre in a Box: Affect and Narcissism in Ray Lee’s Cold Storage . In: Beyond Immersive Theatre. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48044-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics