Skip to main content

Workers’ Participation at Plant Level in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Workers’ Participation at Plant Level
  • 395 Accesses

Abstract

The workers’ participation in management, especially at plant level, has been a substantial part of Indian industrial relations. Following its independence, India introduced Gandhi’s concept of trusteeship in workers-management relations. Indian government, induced by its constitutional promise to promote industrial democracy, took the initiative to create an environment for the active participation of workers in the management of business. The employers’ and workers’ approach towards their respective participation in management had been non-supportive due to fear of losing power. The experience of about seven decades has been mixed in the sense that there has been successful participation at plant level while it has largely remained on paper at the national level. The concept of participatory action has always occupied central stage in India’s pattern of governance. In the sphere of industrial management, the government took initiatives to promote workers’ participation in management. India took policy decision to introduce workers’ participation in the management of industrial establishments, although on a voluntary basis. It was implemented in the government-owned enterprises. The private sector enterprises on the other hand saw it as a threat to their control of enterprises. Infrequent dialogues caused distrust among social partners. In an environment of almost negligible progress, the government tried to give it legislative support by introducing a bill in the Parliament. Workers’ participation in management has, however, so far failed to become a way of life at the national level although there are cases of success at the enterprise level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It provides a means by which the wealthy people would be the trustees of trusts that looked after the welfare of the people in general. Socialists condemned this concept as being in favor of the landlords, feudal princes and the capitalists, thus being opposed to socialist theories.

  2. 2.

    Whitley (1931) Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India.

  3. 3.

    Brought out by the Planning Commission of the Government of India under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister.

  4. 4.

    http://www.pib.nic.in/archive/docs/DVD_11/ACC%20NO%20219-BR/CAB-1956-04-30_113.pdf

  5. 5.

    Planning Commission: Third Five-Year Plan, Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi, 1961.

  6. 6.

    http://www.pib.nic.in/newsite/erelcontent.aspx?relid=15485

  7. 7.

    Brennen, P.; Bastone, E.; Fachett, D. & White, P.

  8. 8.

    Suri and Kumar (1989, pp. 187–188).

Bibliography

  • Alexander, K. C. (1973). Workers Participation in Management. In C. P. Thakur & K. C. Sethi (Eds.), Industrial Democracy – Some Issues and Experiences. New Delhi: SRCIRHR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Burgess, R. (2004). Can Labor Regulation Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 91–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennen, P., Bastone, E., Fachett, D., & White, P. (1976). The Workers’ Director: A Sociology of Participation. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M. K. (1960). Trusteeship. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI. (1980). The 6th Five Year Plan Document. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI. (2001). The Participation of Workers’ Management Bill, 1990. 15th Report of the Standing Committee on Labour, Lok Sabha, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoI. (2006). Ministry of Labor and Employment. Government of India, Press release of 14.02.2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, V. (1984). Industrial Democracy in India. Chug: Allahabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, F. A. (1991). Participation and Competence: A Necessary Relationship. In R. Russell & V. Rus (Eds.), International Handbook on Participation in Organisations II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. (1976). Workers’ Participation in Decisions Within Undertaking (Labour Management Relations Series, No. 48). Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadhu, A. K. (2016). Workers Participation in Management in India. Available from http://managementversity.com/workers-participation-in-management-in-india/. Accessed 23 May 2016.

  • Seth, N. R. (1972). Joint Management Councils – Problems and Prospects. New Delhi: Shri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, K. C. (1973). Workers Participation in Management – A Report and a View Point. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. New Delhi: Sri Ram Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P. (2002). Trade Unions in India – Spreading Wings. In INDIEN 2002. Hamburg: Institute for Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, P., & Srivastava, S. C. (2012). Containing Workplace Conflict – Role of Social Partners. New Delhi: The Bookhouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, J. S., et al. (1995). In Search of Participation: A Study of Some Successful Companies. New Delhi: Sri Ram Centre for Industrial Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, S. C. (2012). Industrial Relations and Labour Laws. Noida: Vikas Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, G. K., & Kumar, J. (1989). In Search of Productivity. New Delhi: National Productivity Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economic Weekly. (1962, January 6). Joint Management Councils – How Have They Been Working? The Economic Weekly, pp. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulpule, B. (1975). Workers Participation in Management. Economic and Political Weekly, 10(46), 1757–1759. Available from http://www.jstor.org/stable/i40033514. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

  • Virmani, B. R. (1978). Workers’ Participation in Management: Some Experiences and Lessons. New Delhi: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitely, J. H. (1931). Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. London: H. M. Stationary Office. Available from http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/17997247?selectedversion=NBD415088. Accessed 1 Oct 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, P. (2019). Workers’ Participation at Plant Level in India. In: Berger, S., Pries, L., Wannöffel, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Workers’ Participation at Plant Level. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48192-4_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48192-4_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48191-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48192-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics