Skip to main content

In Defence of Fun

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
FUN!

Part of the book series: Palgrave Entertainment Industries ((PAEI))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Fun is a vital part of entertainment as a cultural system, but academic writers have tended to value it negatively. In this chapter McKee demonstrates that writers in the aesthetic tradition have excluded fun from their consideration of cultural value or even demonised it as a dangerous distraction from what is truly worthwhile in life (self-improvement, political struggle). Media effects research hasn’t considered fun as an important analytical term. Important intellectual traditions on both pleasure and happiness do exist, but neither of these map comfortably on to ‘fun’ as the word is commonly used. By contrast, in entertainment and in vernacular working-class philosophies, fun has been given a central position and is valued highly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, D. (1992 [1979]). The Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy: A trilogy in four parts. London: Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. (2006 [1971]). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses [Notes towards an investigation]. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 86–111). Malden, MA: Blacwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. (1878). Equality (address delivered at the Royal Institution). The Fortnightly Review, XXIII(135), 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, M. (2006 [1869]). Culture and anarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, P. (1998). Popular culture and performance in the Victorian City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. (Ed.). (2008). The Oxford dictionary of philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, P. (2014). The virtues of happiness: A theory of the good life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosshart, L., & Macconi, I. (1998). Defining “entertainment”. Communication Research Trends, 18(3), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R. B. (1979). A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., & Vorderer, P. (2006). Psychology of entertainment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1994). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: L Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahn, S. M. (2014). Foreword. In C. Vitrano (Ed.), The nature and value of happiness (p. ix). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. X. w., & Muzquiz, R. d. (2012). Free will hunting. Futurama. Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A. (2013). The exploration of happiness: Present and future perspectives. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), The exploration of happiness (pp. 3–14). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F. (1997). Utilitarianism, hedonism and desert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fieser, J., & Lillegard, N. (2002). A historical introduction to philosophy: Texts and interactive guides. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, J. (2006). Introduction. In J. Garnett (Ed.), Culture and anarchy (pp. vii–xxviii). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J. (2000). Hedonism. In E. Craig (Ed.), Concise Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (p. 336). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, B. (2012). Happiness. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggart, R. (1998 [1957]). The uses of literacy. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972 [1944]). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York, NY: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. (1970 [1949]). Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, S. (2009). The Industrial Vagina: The political economy of the global sex trade. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, K. a. D. X. C. w., & Carey-Hill, D. d. (2008). Bender’s big score. Futurama. Los Angeles, Ca: Fox Home Entertainment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C. (2005). Art escapes criticism, or Adorno’s museum. Cultural Critique, 60, 217–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M. W. (2013). Paradoxes of Happiness. In A. Delle Fave (Ed.), The exploration of happiness: Present and future perspectives (pp. 31–46). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2003). Textual analysis: A beginner’s guide. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2007a). The fans of cultural theory. In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world (pp. 88–97). New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. (2007b). Introduction. In A. McKee (Ed.), Beautiful things in popular culture (pp. 1–14). Malden, MA: Blackwells.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T. (1996). Streets smarts and critical theory: Listening to the vernacular. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millbank, L. (2012). Under duress: Agency, power and consent, part two: "yes". A Radical Transfeminist. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://radtransfem.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/under-duress-agency-power-and-consent-part-two-yes/.

  • Moore, A. (2013). Hedonism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Standord encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2013 ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B. (1991). Game theory: Analysis of conflict. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onfray, M. (2002). L’Invention du plaisir. Fragments cyrenaiques [The Invention of Pleasure: Cyreniac Fragments]. Paris: Le Livre de Poche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peiss, K. (1986). Cheap amusements: Working women and leisure in turn-of-the-century New York. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, B. F. (2001). The good life: Alternatives in ethics. Cumnor Hill: Rowan & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J. (Ed.). (2012). The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., & Ritterfield, U. (2004). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 388–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, E. (2008). No fun: Aporias of pleasure in Adorno’s aesthetic theory. German Quarterly, 81(2), 185–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whisnant, R. (2004). Confronting pornography: Some conceptual basics. In C. Stark & R. Whisnant (Eds.), Not for sale: Feminists resisting prostitution and pornography (pp. 15–27). Melbourne, VIC: Spinifex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Vorderer, P. (2000a). Preface. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. vi–x). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Vorderer, P. (Eds.). (2000b). Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKee, A. (2016). In Defence of Fun. In: FUN!. Palgrave Entertainment Industries. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49179-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics