Skip to main content

Critical Quantitative Geo-Spatial Methods and War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Geography and War
  • 773 Accesses

Abstract

Perhaps one of the most surprising arguments in this book, this chapter will make the case that quantitative researchers need to adopt critical methods (and vice versa). To understand geography and war, we need empirical analysis. But we cannot do this blindly: existing research has depended on data that do not meet the needs of conflict research. Two case studies will be presented: measuring mountains to study war and measuring levels of infrastructure development to study war. There are two reasons for choosing these case studies. First, they will demonstrate how we can move from critique to empirical analysis. Second, they will highlight two prominent areas of conflict research, which have depended on two fundamentally misleading geospatial variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sometimes referred to as spatial econometrics, even when economic factors are absent.

  2. 2.

    Writing on the Caucasus, Radvanyi and Muduyev (2007) argue that ‘[a]mong the shortcomings of conventional geographical determinist discourse is the frequent use of the adjective ‘mountainous’ to describe the entire region without qualification or nuance’ (Radvanyi and Muduyev 2007, 158). Similarly, Ó Tuathail (2001) used discourse analysis to argue that people’s notions of mountains were used to create the idea of the Balkans being a powderkeg.

  3. 3.

    See Openshaw (1984).

  4. 4.

    And yes, there are Marilyns: a prominence of 150 metres: see Dawson (1992).

  5. 5.

    Consider again some of the arguments presented in Chap. 1. As well as making the case that the use of the word ‘mountain’ in conflict literature often lacks nuance, Radvanyi and Muduyev (2007) point out that ‘most authors who purportedly analyse “the Caucasus” are actually writing about the piedmonts, unaware of reality in the mountains proper’ (Radvanyi and Muduyev 2007, 174). Zürcher (2007) argues that different types of mountains have different types of effects in South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Chechnya. Bohara et al. (2006) find that hilly terrain saw the most violence in Nepal; the high Himalayas do not provide an environment in which conflict can occur: as a rule of thumb, the probability of conflict is low when you need to carry an oxygen tank. Finally, Dupuy (1985) finds that even land that is generally regarded as flat can hamper tank manoeuvres. Yet Gerrard (2000) argues that there is little point in distinguishing high from low mountains. Using a simple binary, mountain definition will disregard all of these points.

  6. 6.

    Mountain definitions often come with bias; this bias can be based on national factors. Gerrard’s definition here, then, is refreshingly free from such bias: by setting the lower threshold at 1000 m, he has declared England void of mountains: even its highest point, Scafell Pike, is only between 977 and 979 m (depending on source).

  7. 7.

    This map, then, uses one of the ‘tricks of the cartographic trade’ described by Harley (1989): the use of colour. However, another trick it employs, not mentioned by Harley, is that of vertical exaggeration. The elevation of the terrain has been increased by a considerable scale in order that the reader is able to differentiate high areas from lower areas more easily. Put simply, the high points in Africa are not quite as high as this map suggests. This trick is used by NASA quite frequently in their renderings of mountains on other planets. Olympus Mons may indeed be the highest mountain in the solar system; however, rather inconveniently, its gradient is rather shallow. Viewed from a distance, Olympus is not as pleasingly pointy as its terrestrial cousin, Everest, despite being considerably higher. As such, NASA exaggerates the y axis, in relation to the x and z axes. The same principle has been employed in creating the map in Fig. 6.2.

  8. 8.

    This research considers sea level to be the lowest point on Earth. Several states have part of their territories at elevations considerably lower than this: indeed, the lowest point in Africa is Lake Assal (155 metres below sea level) which is today part of Djibouti but would have been part of the territory of Ethiopia. Handling negative elevations would have required considerably more research time but would not yield a substantially different result. As such, the compromise of sea level as the lowest point was accepted.

  9. 9.

    The minimum figure of 0 on this eight-bit scale will represent 0 metres in reality; the maximum figure of 255 on the eight-bit scale will represent 8850 metres (Everest). Accordingly, each of the squares represented in this diagram can be converted to metres by multiplying by 34.71: the top left square (197) is therefore 6837 metres above sea level.

  10. 10.

    Fearon and Laitin look at a slightly different set of states to Collier and Hoeffler; as Gerrard’s data set was created for Collier and Hoeffler, this means that there are some gaps in the data used by Fearon and Laitin. As such, Fearon and Laitin use some interesting methodological shortcuts to fill in these gaps. Adding to the inconsistency, Collier, Hoeffler and Rohner go on to use Fearon and Laitin’s inconsistent data set.

  11. 11.

    A review of research using the DCW to look at infrastructure is beyond the scope of this case study, but as a brief sample, researchers have used the DCW to model infrastructure in their analyses of biodiversity loss (Alkemade et al. 2009), conflict and malnutrition in Africa (Rowhani et al. 2011; Sherbinin 2011), desertification (Okayasu et al. 2010), distribution of HIV and AIDS in Africa (Kalipeni and Zulu 2012), mobility patterns in the Ivory Coast (Dixon et al. 2014), civil wars in Africa (Buhaug and Rød 2006), distribution of forest elephants (Yackulic et al. 2011), and the future of China’s infrastructure (Hou and Li 2011).

  12. 12.

    Nelson et al. (2006) write in reference to the Vector Smart Map Level 0 (VMap0), which is the successor to the DCW. The differences between the DCW and VMap0 are essentially data formatting issues; in terms of actual road data content, they can be regarded as functionally equivalent. The specifications for VMap0 can be found at Defense Mapping Agency (1995b) and Defense Mapping Agency (1995c).

  13. 13.

    To give an idea of the number of people who worked on the creation of the DCW, Langaas (1995, 10) points out that ‘around 200 ESRI staff took part in the project, although several of these were only part-time involved. During the production peak fifty personnel worked full time.’

  14. 14.

    See National Imagery and Mapping Agency (1995).

References

  • Alkemade, R., Oorschot, M. van, Miles, L., Nellemann, C., Bakkenes, M., & Brink, B. ten. (2009). Globio3: A framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems, 12(3), 374–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1966). Peace and war: A theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. (Trans. Richard Howard and Annette Baker Fox)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M. P., & Shroder, J. F. (2004). Geographic information science and mountain geomorphology. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohara, A. K., Mitchell, N. J., & Nepal, M. (2006). Opportunity, democracy, and the exchange of political violence a subnational analysis of conflict in nepal. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1), 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1962). Conflict and defense: A general theory. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H. (2010a). Climate not to blame for African civil wars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16477–16482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H. (2010b). Dude, where’s my conflict? LSG, relative strength, and the location of civil war. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27(2), 107–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., & Gates, S. (2002). The geography of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 39(4), 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., & Gleditsch, K. S. (2005). The origin of conflict clusters: Contagion or bad neighborhoods? In Paper prepared for the third European Consortium for Political Research general conference. Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., & Gleditsch, N. P. (2006). The death of distance? globalization of armed conflict. In M. Kahler & B. F. Walter (Eds.), Territoriality and conflict in an era of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., & Lujala, P. (2005). Accounting for scale: Measuring geography in quantitative studies of civil war. Political Geography, 24, 399–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., & Nordkvelle, J. (2014, 11 November). Climate and conflict: A comment on Hsiang et al.’s reply to Buhaug et al. PRIO Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, H., & Rød, J. K. (2006). Local determinants of African civil wars, 1970–2001. Political Geography, 25(3), 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, M. B., Miguel, E., Satyanath, S., Dykema, J. A., & Lobell, D. B. (2009). Warming increases the risk of civil war in Africa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20670–20674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cederman, L.-E., Rød, J. K., & Weidmann, N. (2006). Geo-referencing of ethnic groups: Creating a new dataset. In Paper prepared for the GROW workshop, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO). Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2000). Greed and grievance in civil war. World Bank Development Research Group Policy Research Working Paper, 2355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Hoeffler, A. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 56, 563–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D., Gleditsch, K. S., & Salehyan, I. (2005). Dyadic interactions and civil war duration. In Paper prepared for the 46th annual convention of the International Studies Association. Honolulu, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A. (1992). The relative hills of Britain. Milnthorpe, Cumbria: Cicerone Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense Mapping Agency. (1995a). Military Specification – Operational Navigation Charts (ONC), MIL-O-89102. http://earth-info.nga.mil/publications/specs/printed/89102/89102.pdf. (Online; accessed 12 February 2015)

  • Defense Mapping Agency. (1995b). Military Specification – Vector Smart Map (VMap) Level 0, MIL-V-89039. http://earth-info.nga.mil/publications/specs/printed/VMAP0/vmap0_main.doc. (Online; accessed 12 February 2015)

  • Defense Mapping Agency. (1995c). Military Specification – Vector Smart Map (VMap) Level 0, MIL-V-89039 Appendix. http://earth-info.nga.mil/publications/specs/printed/VMAP0/vmap0_app.doc. (Online; accessed 12 February 2015)

  • Dixon, M. F., Aiello, S. P., Fapohunda, F., & Goldstein, W. (2014). Detecting mobility patterns in mobile phone data from the Ivory Coast. Mobile Phone Data for Development, Analysis of Mobile Phone Datasets for the Development of Ivory Coast, 9, 656–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, T. (1985). Numbers, predictions & war: The use of history to evaluate and predict the outcome of armed conflict. Fairfax, VA: HERO Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farer, T. J. (1979). War clouds on the Horn of Africa: The widening storn (2nd ed.). New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (1999). Weak states, rough terrain, and large-scale ethnic violence since 1945. In Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Febvre, L. (1932). A geographical introduction to history. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, S. (2002). Empirically assessing the causes of civil war. In Paper prepared for the annual convention of the International Studies Association. New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrard, J. (2000). What is a mountain? World Bank, DECRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, K. S. (2007). Transnational dimensions of civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 44(3), 293–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, K. S., & Pickering, S. (2014). Wars are becoming less frequent: A response to Harrison and Wolf. The Economic History Review, 67(1), 214–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, N. P. (1967). Trends in world airline patterns. Journal of Peace Research, 4(4), 366–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, A. (1985). The encyclopaedic dictionary of physical geography. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulty, G. A. (1991). A dictionary of landscape. Aldershot: Avebury Technical.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara, A. C. (1961). Guerrilla warfare. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica, 26(2), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hell, X. Hommaire de. (1847). Travels in the steppes of the Caspian Sea, the Crimea, the Caucasus, &c. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, Q., & Li, S.-M. (2011). Transport infrastructure development and changing spatial accessibility in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China, 1990–2020. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1350–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang, S. M., Burke, M., & Miguel, E. (2013). Quantifying the influence of climate on human conflict. Science, 341(6151), 1235367-1–1235367-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 24 Committee. (2004). ISO/IEC 15948:2004. ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalipeni, E., & Zulu, L. C. (2012). HIV and AIDS in Africa: A geographic analysis at multiple spatial scales. GeoJournal, 77(4), 505–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langaas, S. (1995). Completeness of the Digital Chart of the World (DCW) database. UNEP/GRID-Arendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichbach, J. I. (1995). The rebel’s dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morelle, R. (2013, 2 August). Rise in violence ‘linked to climate change’. BBC News.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Imagery and Mapping Agency. (1995). Vector Map Level 0 (VMap). http://earth-info.nga.mil/publications/vmap0.html. ([Online; accessed 12 February 2015])

  • Nelson, A., Sherbinin, A. de, & Pozzi, F. (2006). Towards development of a high quality public domain global roads database. Data Science Journal, 5, 223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. (n.d.). Version 4 DMSP-OLS Nighttime Lights Time Series. Version4DMSP-OLSNighttimeLightsTimeSeries. (Image and data processing by NOAA’s National Geophysical Data Center. DMSP data collected by US Air Force Weather Agency.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Okayasu, T., Okuro, T., Jamsran, U., & Takeuchi, K. (2010). Desertification emerges through cross-scale interaction. Global Environmental Research, 14, 71–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, J. (2003). Spatial analysis in political geography. In J. Agnew, K. Mitchell, & G. Ó Tuathail (Eds.), A companion to political geography. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Catmog, Study Group in Quantitative Methods, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormhaug, C. (2007). Disaggregating conflict data – coding challenges. In Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the International Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Tuathail, G. (2001). The Bosnian war and the American securing of “Europe”. In M. Antonsich, V. Kolossov, & M. P. Pagnini (Eds.), On the century of Ratzel’s Politische Geographie: Europe between political geography and geopolitics (Vol. 2, pp. 797–812). Rome: Società Geografica Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, P. N., & Slaymaker, O. (2004). Mountain geomorphology. Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, S. (2012). Proximity, maps and conflict: New measures, new maps and new findings. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(4), 425–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, S. (2015). infra: An infrastructure proxy function. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=infra (R package version 0.1.2)

  • Pickering, S. (2016). Introducing SpatialGridBuilder: A new system for creating geo-coded datasets. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 33(4), 423–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potere, D., Schneider, A., Angel, S., & Civco, D. L. (2009). Mapping urban areas on a global scale: Which of the eight maps now available is more accurate? International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(24), 6531–6558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radvanyi, J., & Muduyev, S. S. (2007). Challenges facing the mountain peoples of the Caucasus. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 48(2), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, C., & Hegre, H. (2009). Population size, concentration, and civil war. a geographically disaggregated analysis. Political Geography, 28(4), 224–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robst, J., Polachek, S., & Chang, Y.-C. (2007). Geographic proximity, trade, and international conflict/cooperation. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowhani, P., Degomme, O., Guha-Sapir, D., & Lambin, E. F. (2011). Malnutrition and conflict in east Africa: The impacts of resource variability on human security. Climatic Change, 105(1–2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambanis, N. (2002). A review of recent advances and future directions in the quantitative literature on civil war. Defence and Peace Economics, 13(3), 215–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, B. (2008). World borders dataset. http://www.thematicmapping.org/downloads/world_borders.php. (Online; accessed 12 February 2015)

  • Semple, E. C. (1911). Influences of geographic environment on the basis of Ratzel’s system of anthropo-geography. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherbinin, A. de. (2011). The biophysical and geographical correlates of child malnutrition in Africa. Population, Space and Place, 17(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siverson, R. M., & Starr, H. (1991). The diffusion of war: A study of opportunity and willingness. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (1995). On drawing lines on a map. In A. U. Frank, W. Kuhn, & D. M. Mark (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Proceedings of COSIT ’95 (pp. 475–484). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. G., & Langaas, S. (1995). A survey of Digital Chart of the World (DCW) use and data quality. UNEP/GRID-Arendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H. (1978). “Opportunity” and “willingness” as ordering concepts in the study of war. International Interactions, 4(4), 363–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H., & Bain, W. (1995). The application of geographic information systems (GIS) to international studies. International Studies Notes, 20(2), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H., & Most, B. A. (1976). The substance and study of borders in international relations research. International Studies Quarterly, 581–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starr, H., & Most, B. A. (1978). A return journey: Richardson, “frontiers” and wars in the 1946–1965 era. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22(3), 441–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storeygard, A. (2013). Farther on down the road: Transport costs, trade and urban growth in sub-saharan Africa. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper(6444).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammen, R. L., Kugler, J., Lemke, D., Stam, A. C., Alsharabati, C., Abdollahian, M. A., et al. (2000). Power transistions: Strategies for the 21st century. New York: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theisen, O. M., Gleditsch, N. P., & Buhaug, H. (2013). Is climate change a driver of armed conflict? Climatic Change, 117(3), 613–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsell, J. W., & Harrison, J. (1992). National parks and nature reserves in mountain environments and development. GeoJournal, 27(1), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, M. D. (2003). The geography of ethnic violence: Identities, interests and the indivisibility of territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, H., & Nelson, A. (2010). Agglomeration index: Towards a new measure of urban concentration (Tech. Rep.). Tokyo: Working paper/World Institute for Development Economics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesley, J. P. (1962). Frequency of wars and geographical opportunity. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 387–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackulic, C. B., Strindberg, S., Maisels, F., & Blake, S. (2011). The spatial structure of hunter access determines the local abundance of forest elephants (Loxodonta africana cyclotis). Ecological Applications, 21(4), 1296–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürcher, C. (2007). The post-Soviet wars: Rebellion, ethnic conflict and nationhood in the Caucasus. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pickering, S. (2017). Critical Quantitative Geo-Spatial Methods and War. In: Understanding Geography and War. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52217-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics