Abstract
This chapter examines the ways in which language ideologies are embedded in English and French Canadian Twitter. Tweets are drawn from the accounts of Canada’s three main political party leaders and other tweets are collected based on the use of English and French Canadian hashtags. Findings show that although languages tend not to be an explicit topic of discussion, the French language, culture and speakers are more topical than the English language, culture and speakers. Also, assumptions about languages become embedded through the use of bilingual vs. monolingual accounts, code-switching and code-mixing, and English and French hashtags. These findings suggest the ways in which traditional offline categories such as “nation state” continue to be relevant in online spaces – especially with relation to language politics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
CHINESE, RUSSIA/N, and GERMAN/Y were found in the corpus but without any relevance to language or cultural issues.
References
Canadian Standing Senate Committee on Official Languages. (2012). Internet, new media and social media: Respect for language rights! Available http://www.parl.gc.ca/Content/SEN/Committee/411/OLLO/rep/rep05oct12-e.pdf
Canadian Press. (2015, 12 February). Federal ministers must tweet in both English and French: Language czar. CTV News. Available http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/federal-ministers-must-tweet-in-both-english-and-french-language-czar-1.2233799
Chen, P. J., & Smith, P. J. (2011). Digital media in the 2008 Canadian election. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8(4), 399–417.
Dubois, E., & Dutton, W. H. (2012). The fifth estate in Internet governance: Collective accountability of a Canadian policy initiative. Revue française d’études américaines, 4(134). Available https://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-d-etudes-americaines-2012-4-page-81.htm
Dubois, E., & Gaffney, D. (2014). The multiple facets of influence: Identifying political influential and opinion leaders on Twitter. American Behavioural Scientist, 58(10), 1–18.
Gruzd, A., & Roy, J. (2014). Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(1), 28–45.
Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioural Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318.
Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages. (2015). Statement from the Commissioner of Official Languages about ministers’ Twitter use. Available http://www.officiallanguages.gc.ca/en/news/releases/2015/2015-02-20
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide. London: Routledge.
Partington, A. (2010). Modern diachronic corpus-assisted discourse studies (MD-CADS) on UK newspapers: An overview of the project. Corpora, 5(2), 83–108.
Scott, M. (2014). WordSmith Tools, Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
Small, T. A. (2010a). Canadian politics in 140 characters: Party politics in the Twitterverse. Canadian Parliamentary Review, 33(3), 103–124.
Small, T. A. (2010b). Still waiting for an Internet prime minister: Online campaigning by Canadian political parties. In H. McIvor (Ed.), Election (pp. 173–198). Toronto: Emond Montgomery.
Small, T. A. (2014). The not-so-social network: The use of Twitter by Canada’s party leaders. In A. Marland, T. Giasson, & T. A. Small (Eds.), Political communication in Canada: Meet the press and tweet the rest (pp. 92–110). Vancouver: UBC Press.
Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13(5), 708–806.
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vessey, R. (2016). Language Ideologies and Twitter in Canada. In: Language and Canadian Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53001-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53001-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53000-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53001-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)