Abstract
This chapter reflects on methodological and ethical issues arising in a digital ethnography project conducted in domestic environments. The participatory aims of the methodological approach required participants to produce a series of videos exploring domestic digital environments. The videos were then uploaded using an ethnographic software application. Early in the project it became evident that researchers had limited control over important aspects of the technology, and that the technology itself was having disruptive effects in households. Further, although the study was designed to be engaging and playful for participants, the tasks of producing the videos was perceived by some participants as requiring onerous levels of creativity and digital media literacy. The chapter discusses these methodological and ethical issues, and how they were largely resolved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnold, Michael. 2004. The Connected homes project: Probing the effects and affects of domesticated ICTs. In Artful integration: Interweaving media, materials and practices, Vol. 2. Proceedings of the Eighth Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ed. A. Bond. Toronto.
Arnold, Michael, Thomas Apperley, Bjorn Nansen, Rowan Wilken, and Martin Gibbs. 2014. Patchwork network: Spectrum politics, the digital home and installation of the Australian National Broadband Network. In Management of Broadband Technology Innovation: Policy, Deployment and Use, ed. Jyoti Choudrie, and C. Catherine Middleton, 25–42. New York: Routledge.
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). 2015. Communications Report. Canberra: ACMA.
Blythe, Mark, Andrew Monk, and Jisoo Park. 2002. Technology biographies: Field study techniques for home use product development. In Proceedings of CHI 2002: Changing The World, Changing Ourselves. Minneapolis, 658–659.
Bolger, Niall, Angelina Davis, and Eshkol Rafaeli. 2003. Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 579–616.
Gaver, Bill, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Cultural probes. Interactions 6(1): 21–29.
Greenfield, Susan. 2014. Mind Change: How Digital Technologies are Leaving Their Mark on Our Brains. London: Rider.
Haddon, Leslie. 2011. Domestication analysis, objects of study, and the centrality of technologies in everyday life. Canadian Journal of Communication 36: 311–323.
Horst, Willem, Ties Bunt, Stephan Wensveen, and Lisa Cherian. 2004. Designing probes for empathy with families. In Proc. Dutch Directions in HCI’07. New York: ACM Press, 2937.
Hughes, Thomas P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kahneman, Daniel, Alan Kreuger, David A. Schkade, Norbert Schwarz, and Arthur A. Stone. 2004. A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science 306: 1776–1780.
Kennedy, Jenny, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, Rowan Wilken, and Martin Gibbs. 2015. Digital housekeepers and digital expertise an the networked home. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. Advanced online publication doi:10.1177/1354856515579848.
Lally, Elaine. 2002. At Home with Computers. Oxford: Berg.
Mackay, Hugh, and Darren Ivey. 2004. Modern Media in the Home: An Ethnographic Study. Rome: John Libbey.
McCracken, Grant. 1988. Culture and Consumption. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Miller, Daniel. 2012. Consumption and its Consequences. Cambridge: Polity.
Nansen, Bjorn, Michael Arnold, Martin Gibbs, and Hilary Davis. 2009. Domestic orchestration: Rhythms in the mediated home. Time and Society 18(2): 181–207.
———. 2011. Dwelling with media stuff: Latencies of materiality in four Australian homes. Environment and Planning D 29(4): 693–715.
OfCom. 2013. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. London: OfCom.
Petersen, Marianne Graves. 2002. Designing for learning in use of everyday artefacts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Aarhus, 2002. Aarhus: University of Aarhus.
Shepherd, Chris, Michael Arnold, Craig Bellamy, and Martin Gibbs. 2007. The material ecologies of domestic ICTs. The Electronic Journal of Communication 17: 1–20.
Silverstone, Roger, and Eric Hirsch (ed). 1992. Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. London: Routledge.
Spigel, Lynn. 1992. Make Room for TV: Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2001. Media homes: Then and now. International Journal of Cultural Studies 4(4): 385–411.
Wilken, Rowan, Michael Arnold, Bjorn Nansen, Jenny Kennedy, and Martin Gibbs. 2014. National, local and household media ecologies: The case of Australia’s national broadband network. Communication, Politics and Culture 46(2): 136–154.
Bickman, Leonard, and Debra Rog. 2009. The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Australian Research Council [DP130101519]. The authors would like to thank the research participants for their enthusiasm, time and support. Participant permission has been granted for the use of images in this publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nansen, B., Wilken, R., Kennedy, J., Arnold, M., Gibbs, M. (2016). Methodological and Ethical Concerns Associated with Digital Ethnography in Domestic Environments: Participant Burden and Burdensome Technologies. In: Warr, D., Guillemin, M., Cox, S., Waycott, J. (eds) Ethics and Visual Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54305-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54854-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54305-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)