Skip to main content

Economics of Complexity and the Analysis of Local Regulation: The Case of Urban Mobility

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Political Economy of Local Regulation

Abstract

In the last two decades economics of complexity has provided new tools to improve the analysis of complex systems. The supply of public goods and services is an example of economic problems implying complex systems. This chapter gives some insights on the need to use advanced tools to analyse the effects of the local regulation in high-complexity systems, focusing on agent-based models (ABMs) and their application to urban mobility and transport management policies. It provides a review of research on this issue, explicitly focusing on urban areas where different agents interact. Passenger flows and their negative effects on the community are increasing, and the need to identify effective and efficient regulation policies for more sustainable transport has become a key challenge. ABMs demonstrate potentially important advantages for evaluating public policies and particularly in the case of passenger mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ambrosino, A. (2006). Verso una teoria cognitiva delle istituzioni economiche. PhD Dissertation, Turin, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrosino, A. (2014). A cognitive approach to law and economics: Hayek’s legacy. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(1), 19–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, P. (1972). More is different. Science Magazine, 177(4047), 393–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B., Durlauf, S. N., & Lane, D. A. (Eds.) (1997). The economy as an evolving complex system II. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. B. (2010). Complexity, the Santa Fe approach, and non-equilibrium economics. History of Economic Ideas, 18(2), 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benenson, I., Martens, K., & Birfir, S. (2008). PARKAGENT: An agent-based model of parking in the city. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32, 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. (2014). Cities as complex systems. In B. A. Furtado, P. A. M. Sakowski, & M. H. Tovolli (Eds.), Modeling complex systems for public policies. Ipea.: Basilea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G., Riolo, R., Robinson, D. T., North, M., & Rand, W. (2005). Spatial process and data models: Toward integration of agent-based models and GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems. Special Issue on Space-Time Information Systems, 7(1), 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buliung, R. N., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2007). Activity–travel behaviour research: Conceptual issues, state of the art, and emerging perspectives on behavioural analysis and simulation modelling. Transport Reviews, 27(2), 151–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks, A.T. (2006). Exploring cities using agent-based models and GIS. Working Paper No. 109. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., Henesey, L., Ramstedt, L., Toernquist, J., & Wernstedt, F. (2005). An analysis of agent-based approaches to transport logistics. Transportation Research Part C, 13, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Together towards competitive and resource-efficient urban mobility. Commission staff working document, A call to action on urban logistics, Brussels, 17.12.2013, SWD(2013) 524 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana, M. (2010). Can neoclassical economics handle complexity? The fallacy of the oil spot dynamic. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(3), 584–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, A.B., Sakowski P.A.M., Tovolli M.H. (Eds.). (2015). Modeling complex systems for public policies. Brasilia: IPEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2008). Agent-based models. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2012). Triumph of the city: How our greater invention make us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1952). The sensory order. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1967). Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harland, K., & Stillwell, J. (2007). Using PLASC data to identify patterns of commuting to school, residential migration and movement between schools in Leeds. Working Paper No. 07/03. Leeds: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1970). The economic of cities. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, M. A., & Jager, W. (2002). Stimulating diffusion of green products: Co-evolution between firms and consumers. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Y., Kawamura, K., & Zellner, M. L. (2008). Exploring the influence of urban form on work travel behavior with agent-based modelling. Transportation Research Record, 2082, 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggi, E. (2007). La logistica urbana delle merci. Aspetti economici e normativi. Milan: Polipress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maggi, E., & Vallino, E. (2016). Understanding urban mobility and the impact of public policies: The role of the agent-based models. Research in Transportation Economics, 55, 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 1117–1156). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najlis, R., & North, M. J. (2004). Repast for GIS. In C. M. Macal, D. Sallach, & M. J. North (Eds.), Proceedings of agent 2004: Social dynamics: Interaction, reflexivity and emergence (pp. 255–259). Chicago: Co-sponsored by Argonne National Laboratory and The University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natalini, D., & Bravo, G. (2014). Encouraging sustainable transport choices in American households: Results from an empirically grounded agent-based model. Sustainability, 6, 50–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Torrens, P.M. (2000). Cellular models of urban systems.Working Paper No 22. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvini, P., & Miller, E. J. (2005). ILUTE: An operational prototype of a comprehensive microsimulation model of urban systems. Networks and Spatial Economics, 5, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelhorn, T., O’Sullivan, D., Haklay, M., & Thurstain-Goodwin, M. (1999). STREETS: An agent-based pedestrian model. Working Paper No. 9. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafiei, E., Stefansson, H., Asgeirsson, E. I., Davidsdottir, B., & Raberto, M. (2013). Integrated agent-based and system dynamics modelling for simulation of sustainable mobility. Transport Reviews, 33(1), 44–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, N., Munoz, A., Ma, J., & Huynh, N. (2013). Hybrid agent based simulation with adaptive learning of travel mode choices for university commuters. Paper presented at the Workshop on Model-driven Approaches for Simulation Engineering, Symposium on Theory eof Modeling and Simulation, SCS SpringSim Conference, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shubik M. (2003). The Economics Program at the sfi Institute: 1984–2002. A report prepared by Martin Shubik with the collaboration of former directors and members for the economics program board at the request of the Science Board agenda Committee, available at http://tuvalu.santafe.edu/files/gems/scienceboard03/Shubik.pdf.

  • Simon, H. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice. In Models of man, social and Rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., Beckman, R., Anson, D., Nagel, K., & Williams, M.E. (1995). TRANSIMS: Transportation analysis and simulation system. Fifth National Conference on Transportation Planning Methods Applications (Vol. II). Washington, DC: Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, F. (2012). Agent-based computational sociology. Chicester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens, P. M., & Benenson, I. (2005). Geographic automata systems. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 19(4), 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2015). An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M., & Jennings, N. R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, F. (1998). An experiment on the generic polycentricity of urban growth in a cellular automatic city. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 25, 731–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ambrosino, A., Maggi, E., Vallino, E. (2017). Economics of Complexity and the Analysis of Local Regulation: The Case of Urban Mobility. In: Asquer, A., Becchis, F., Russolillo, D. (eds) The Political Economy of Local Regulation. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58828-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics