Skip to main content
  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout Western Europe, parliaments are unrepresentative of their populations’ social structure and this was also the case with post-communist parliaments, where striking change in the social composition of deputies was evident from the outset. We have noted that the Soviet concept of representation placed great stress on parliament as a reflection of the social character of the population. Although communist parliamentarians never provided a precise mirror image of their populations, their social composition was indeed wider than that characteristic of the West. Yet the composition of the new freely chosen legislatures was far narrower than that of their communist predecessors; generally, it became more so with successive elections. The speed with which the new parliaments came to resemble their Western counterparts was a feature of post-communist political transformation, though the resemblance was far from exact. There were also some considerable differences between countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Pippa Norris, ‘Legislative Recruitment’ in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard Niemi and Pippa Norris, eds, Comparing Democracies, London: Sage, 1996, p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael GallÁgher and Michael Marsh, ‘Conclusion’ in Michael GallÁgher and Michael Marsh, eds, Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, London: Sage 1988, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eric A. Nordlinger, ‘Representation, Governmental Stability, and Decisional Effectiveness’ in J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, eds, Representation, New York: Atherton, 1968, pp. 113–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Iain McLean, ‘Forms of Representation and Systems of Voting’ in David Held, ed., Political Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991, p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanna Pitkin, The Concept of Representation, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Steven Saxonberg, ‘Women in East European Parliaments’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 11, no. 2, April 2000, p. 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peter Vanneman, The Supreme Soviet: Politics and the Legislative Process in the Soviet Political System, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel Nelson and Stephen White, Communist Legislatures in Comparative Perspective, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1982.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Robert Siegler, The Standing Commissions of the Supreme Soviet, New York: Praeger, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. David Lane, Politics and Society in the USSR, London: Martin Robertson, 1978 (2nd edn), pp. 154–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Petr Kopecký, Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001, p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  12. David Olson, ‘The New Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of the Federal Assembly of the Czech and Slovak Republics’ in Attila Ágh, ed., The Emergence of Central European Parliaments: The First Steps, Budapest: Hungarian Centre of Democracy Studies, 1994, pp. 42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gabriella Ilonszki, ‘Legislative Recruitment: Personnel and Institutional Development in Hungary, 1990–94’ in Gábor Tóka and Zsolt Enyedi, eds, Elections to the Hungarian National Assembly 1994. Analyses, Documents and Data, Berlin: Sigma, 1999, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard Sakwa, ‘The Russian Elections of December 1993’, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 47, no. 2, 1995, pp. 198–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Janos Farkas and Agnes Vajda, ‘Candidates for Parliament’ in Gàbor Tóka, ed., The 1990 Election to the Hungarian National Assembly. Analyses, Documents and Data, Berlin: Sigma, 1995, p. 82 (Table 13).

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Loewenburg, ‘The New Political Leadership of Central Europe: The Example of the New Hungarian National Assembly’ in Thomas F. Remington, ed., Parliaments in Transition. The New Legislative Politics in the Former USSR and Eastern Europe, Boulder: Westview Press, 1994, p. 45.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jiri Pehe, ‘Elections Result in Surprise Stalemate’, Transition, vol. 2, no. 13, 28 June 1996, p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lukáš Fila, ‘Who is ANO: TV & Sports Figures, Field Experts but not Politicians’, Slovak Spectator, 12–18 August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Timothy J. Colton and Michael McFaul, ‘Reinventing Russia’s Party of Power: “Unity” and the 1999 Duma Election’, Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 16, no. 3, 2000, pp. 201–24.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Richard Rose and Neil Munro, Elections without Order. Russia’s Challenge to Vladimir Putin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 138.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Eric S. Herron, ‘Mixed Electoral Rules and Party Strategies. Responses to Incentives by Ukraine’s Rukh and Russia’s Yabloko’, Party Politics, vol. 8, no. 6, November 2002, pp. 719–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernard Tamas, ‘Parties on Stage: Evaluating the Performance of Hungarian Parties’ in Gábor Tóka and Zsolt Enyedi, eds, Elections to the Hungarian National Assembly 1994. Analyses, Documents and Data, Berlin: Sigma, 1999, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Michael Gallagher and Michael Marsh, eds, Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, London: Sage, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gabriella Ilonszki, ‘Consolidation of Hungarian Democracy’ in Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Raivo Vetik, eds, Perspectives on Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe, Boulder: East European Monographs, 2001, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aleks Szczerbiak, Poles Together. Emergence and Development of Political Parties in Post-Communist Poland, Budapest: CEU Press, 2001, pp. 51–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vello Pettai and Marcus Kreuzer, ‘Party Politics in the Baltic States: Social Bases and Institutional Conflicts’, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 13, no. 1, winter 1999, p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Wolosky, ‘Putin’s Plutocrat Problem’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 79, no. 2, 2000, pp. 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Attila Ágh, ‘The Hungarian Party System and Party Theory in the Transition of Central Europe’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 6, no. 2, 1994, pp. 227, 230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Joel Heilman, Geraint Jones and Daniel Kaufman, ‘Seize the State, Seize the Day: An Empirical Analysis of State Capture and Corruption in Transition Economies’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2444, World Bank: Washington, DC., 2000, pp. 1–41.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Andrei Schleifer and Daniel Treisman, Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walter Connor, Socialism, Politics and Equality, New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Michael D. Kennedy, Professionals, Power and Solidarity in Poland, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, Table 7.1, p. 245.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. András Bozóki, ‘Introduction’ in András Bozóki, ed., Intellectuals and Politics in Central Europe, Budapest: Central European Press, 1999, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Widacki, Czego nie powiedział Generał Kiszczak, Warsaw: BGW, 1992, pp. 45, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  35. George Schöpfłin, ‘Opposition and Para-Opposition: Critical Currents in Hungary, 1968–78’ in Rudolf Tőkés, ed., Opposition in Eastern Europe, London: Macmillan, 1979, pp. 142–86.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Joni Lovenduski and Jean Woodall, Politics and Society in Eastern Europe, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1987, pp. 237–45.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. Herbert Kitschelt with Anthony McGann, The Radical Right in Western Europe. A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor: the University of Michigan Press, 1997, pp. 34–5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sarah Birch, ‘Nomenklatura Democratization: Electoral Clientelism and Party Formation in Post-Soviet Ukraine’, Democratization, vol. 4, no. 4, 1997, pp. 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. N. Ryabov, cited by Peter Lentini, ‘Elections and Political Order in Russia: The 1993 Elections to the State Duma’, The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, June 1994, p. 178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Reschová, ‘Nová politika s novými l’ud’mi: Federálne zhromaždenie v roku 1990’, Sociologicky Časopis, vol. 28, no. 2, 1992, p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Włodzimierz Wesolowski, Partie: Nieustanne Kłopoty, Warsaw: IFIS PAN, 2000, p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jane L. Curry and Irena Panków, ‘Social Movements and Pluralist Theory: The Conundrum of Solidarity in Poland’s Democratization’ in Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Raivo Vetik, eds, Perspectives on Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe, Boulder: East European Monographs, 2001, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jiri Pehe, ‘European Union Wins Czech Elections — Barely’, East European Constitutional Review, vol. 11, no. 3, summer 2002, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Frances Millard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Millard, F. (2004). Standing for Office: Parties and their Candidates. In: Elections, Parties and Representation in Post-Communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000865_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics