Abstract
The Free Trade Area of the Américas (FTAA) is an international trade agreement that aims to eliminate the remaining barriers to the free flow of money, goods, and services across borders in the Western hemisphere (excluding Cuba), to create one large integrated open market. If successful the FTAA would encompass 655 million people and a combined gross domestic product of $9 trillion. The stated goals of the FTAA, according to the Organization of Américan States (OAS) and the Interamerican Development Bank (IDB) are to provide “free market access to goods and services for the entire continent,” to link less open and less developed economies in a spirit of solidarity and commercial interdependence, promoting modernization, efficiency and “more open, competitive and stronger democratic societies in Latin América and the Caribbean.”1 The FTAA falls within the wider free trade and free markets approach promoted by the World Bank, International Monetary Fund (IMF), and World Trade Organization (WTO) to be part of a solution to poverty and inequity. In reality, the rules and policies of free trade are designed to create a stable and profitable environment for corporations and investors. Like other previous economic integration projects, the primary backers are the business community and the politicians over which they have the most influence. Not surprisingly, the opponents of the FTAA can be found among groups concerned with labor rights, human rights, the environment, and indigenous concerns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Apple, R. W., Jr. (1993). “A High Stakes Gamble that Paid Off,” New York Times, November 19.
Arnold, R. Douglas. (1990). The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Blydenburgh, John. (1971). “The Closed Rule and the Paradox of Voting,” Journal of Politics, February, 57–71.
Crabb, Cecil V., Jr., and Pat M. Holt. (1992). Invitation to Struggle: Congress, The President and Foreign Policy, 4th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 2.
Dahl, Robert A. (1990). “Myth of the Presidential Mandate,” Polítical Science Quarterly, vol. 105, no. 3: 355–371.
Destler, I. M. (1986). American Trade Politics: Systems Under Stress. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics; New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Destler, I. M. (1998). “Congress, Constituencies, and U.S. Trade Policy.” In Constituency Interests and U.S.Trade Policy. Alan V. Dearhoff and Robert M. Stern eds. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 93 — 107.
Executive Council of the AFL-CIO. (2001). “Global Fairness and the Free Trade Areas of the Americas (FTAA),” February. Retrieved from www.aflcio.org.
Femo, Richard F., Jr. (1978). Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little Brown.
FTAA Declaration of Ministers, Fifth Trade Ministerial Meeting, Toronto, Canada, November 4, 1999. Retrieved from www.alca-ftaa.org.
Gaddie, Ronald Keith and Charles S. Bullock, III. (2000). Election to Open Seats in the U.S. House: Where the Action Is. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
Gallup, George, Jr. (1995). The Gallup Poll—Public Opinion, 1994. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Inc.
Gallup, George, Jr. (1998). The Gallup Poll—Public Opinion, 1991. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources Inc.
Hosansky, David. (1998). “House Vote Signals a Key Reversal of US. Support for Free Trade,” Congressional Quarterly Weekly, September 26.
Ifil, Gwen. (1993). “Americans Split on Free Trade Pact, Survey Finds,” New York Times, November 16.
Inter-American Dialogue. (2000). A Time for Decisions: U.S. Policy in the Western Hemisphere. Washington, DC: Inter-Américan Dialogue, 1.
Jatar, Julia and Sidney Weintraub, eds. (1997). Integrating the Hemisphere—Perspectives from Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Interamerican Dialogue.
Jehl, Douglas. (1993). “Scramble in the Capital for Today’s Pact Vote,” New York Times, November 17.
Kelley, Stanley, Jr. (1982). Interpreting Election. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Livingston, C. Don and Kenneth A. Wink. (1997). “The Passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement in the US. House of Representatives: Presidential Leadership or Presidential Luck?” Presidential Studies Quarterly, Winter, 52–70.
Milbank, Dana. (2001). “Key Goals Face Early Obstacles,” Washington Post, February 27.
Neal, Terry M. (2000). “Bush Vows to Push for Strong Ties to Latin América,” Washington Post, August 26.
Oleszek, Walter J. (1996). Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process (4th ed.) Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Pomper, Gerald M. (2001).“The Presidential Election.” In The Election of 2000: Reports and Interpretations. New York: Chatham House, 125–153.
Rohde, David W (1991). Parties and Leaders in the Post Reform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Shepsle, Kenneth A. and Barry R. Weingast, Eds. (1995). Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Strom, Gerald S. (1990). The Logic of Lawmaking: A Spatial Theory Approach. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2002 Gary Prevost and Carlos Oliva Campos
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Prevost, G., Weber, R. (2002). The Prospects for the Free Trade Area of the Américas in the Bush Administration. In: Prevost, G., Campos, C.O. (eds) Neoliberalism and Neopanamericanism. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107434_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107434_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38775-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10743-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)