Skip to main content

The Proper Uses of Eminent Domain for Urban Redevelopment

Is Eminent Domain Necessary?

  • Chapter
Property Rights

Abstract

The U.S. Supreme Court nullified substantive limits on the use of eminent domain for economic development purposes in Kelo v. City of New London. While planners, private developers, and local economic development officials praised the decision because it protected their discretion, the practical effect has been to make rights to private land development and improvements discretionary and subject to the desires of majoritarian interests within a city or state. As long as cities, states, and other government agencies follow the letter of the law and formal procedures, property can be condemned and transferred to the public sector or other private parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balmer, W. 1996. Memorandum from Community Development Manager, City of Mesa to Charles Luster, City Manager, City of Mesa, July 24, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartt, D.B. and K. Hopkins. 2002. Revisions for Consideration—Community Development Plan for the West End District, Memorandum to Frank Pietravoia, December 16, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakewood, City of. 2002. Community Development Plan for the West End District: Volume I Determination and Actions, prepared for the city of Lakewood by D.B. Hartt, Inc. and Square One, Inc., July 25, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. Development Agreement with Lakewood Shoppes LLC, adopted June 16, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Justice. Putting the Brakes on Eminent Domain Abuse in Mesa, Arizona, Litigation Backgrounder, http://www.ij.org/private_property/arizona/background.html/.

  • —. Ohio’s City of Homes Faces Wrecking Ball of Eminent Domain Abuse, Litigation Backgrounder, http://www.ij.org/private_property/lakewood/backgrounder.html/.

  • Lenhart’s ACE Hardware. 2000. Proposal for City of Mesa, Site 24 Redevelopment Project, January 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, Edward J. and Sasha M. Totah. 2007. Kelo and Its Discontents, The Independent Review 11 (3): 397–416, http://independent.org/pdf/tir/tir_11_03_04_lopez.pdf/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, City of. 1999a. Minutes, Downtown Development Committee Meeting, January 21, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999b. Minutes. City Council, March 15, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owsiany, D. 2006. Ohio Court Restores Balance to Eminent Domain, Akron Beacon Journal, August 1, 2006, http://www.reason.org/commentaries/owsiany_20060801.shtml/.

  • Pringle, C. 2007. Development Without Eminent Domain. Washington, DC: Institute for Justice, http://www.castlecoalition.org/pdf/publications/Perspectives-Pringle.pdf/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason Foundation. Amicus Curiae brief, City of Long Branch v. Gregory P. Brower, et al., Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division, n.d.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Amicus Curiae brief, City of Norwood v. Homey, Ohio Supreme Court, n.d.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staley, S.R. 2003. Wrecking Property Rights, Reason, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2006. Property Owners Score Major Victory in Ohio, Reason.org, July 27, 2006, http://www.reason.org/commentaries/staley_20060727.shtml/.

  • Staley, S.R. and J.P. Blair. 2005. Eminent Domain, Private Property, and Redevelopment: An Economic Analysis, Policy Study No. 331. Los Angeles: Reason Foundation, February, http://www.reason.org/ps331.pdf/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, G.K. and R. Salvino. 2006. Kelo v. Leviathan: The Public Purpose Doctrine and Government Size, Working Paper No. 06–02, Urban and Regional Analysis Group, School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2004–2005. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Bruce L. Benson

Copyright information

© 2010 The Independent Institute

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Staley, S.R. (2010). The Proper Uses of Eminent Domain for Urban Redevelopment. In: Benson, B.L. (eds) Property Rights. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107793_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics