Skip to main content

Global governance systems must deal with or be able to accommodate large-scale violations/disruptions

  • Chapter
The Fundamentals of Global Governance
  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

How comprehensively and thoroughly must something be governed in order for the governance in question to be fully meaningful? The governance of any large human system can comprise a staggering number of component sub-systems and variables, many of which can have negative, though not usually systemically threatening consequences. States, for example, can experience a variety of economic, social and political crises which might unseat a government but leave the general integrity of the state unscathed. Even the routine business of hard budgetary choices can affect the quality of some aspects of state governance as much as instances of managerial incompetence or the impact of unanticipated events. And although weak, failed and ‘quasi states’ are a source of practical concern and of scholarly interest,1 the terms themselves are not free of ambiguity; and a determination of these conditions is a matter of judgement, not precise measurement against agreed criteria. Yet when a state is unable or unwilling to halt widespread violence, human rights abuses, or other sources of large-scale human suffering within its sovereign bounds, definitional precision is moot. Indeed, the report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty argued that sovereign immunity from humanitarian intervention should be regarded as conditional on a state’s ability and willingness to protect its citizens from catastrophe, not a legal absolute.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Usman Hannan and Hany Besada, ‘Dimensions of State Fragility: A Review of the Social Science Literature’, The Centre for International Governance Innovation, Working Paper 33 (November 2007);

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert H. Jackson, Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gabriel M. Leung, ‘Global Public Health Research Preparedness against Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases’, in Stella R. Quah (ed.) Crisis Preparedness: Asia and the Global Governance of Epidemics (Stanford: the Brookings Institution for the Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, 2007), p.142.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nana N. Poku, Alan Whiteside and Bjorg Sandkjaer (eds), AIDS and Governance (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jim Whitman, ‘Disseminative Systems and Global Governance’, Global Governance, Vol. 11, No. 1 (Jan–March 2005), pp.85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Interview with Yra Harris, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, in Steven Drobny, Inside the House of Money: Top Hedge Fund Traders on Profiting in the Global Markets (Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2006), p.203.

    Google Scholar 

  7. BBC News, ‘Northern Rock to be Nationalised’, 17 February 2000–8, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7249575.stm

    Google Scholar 

  8. BBC News, ‘Central banks fight credit crisis’, 11 March 2008, available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7289815.stm

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kern Alexander, Rahul Dhumale and John Eatwell, Global Governance of Financial Systems: The International Regulation of Systemic Risk (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. John Braithwaite and Peter Drahos, Global Business Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp.88–142.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A useful survey of the ‘international discourse on adaptation to climate change’ can be found in E. Lisa F. Schipper, ‘Climate Change Adaptation and Development: Exploring the Linkages’, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 107 (July 2007), available at: http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/twp107.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  12. White House, The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (2002), p.15. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Institute of Finance, ‘Interim Report of the IIF Committee on Market Best Practices’, April 2008, p.1. Available at: http://www.iif.com

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Madeley, Hungry for Trade: How the Poor pay for Free Trade (London: Zed Books, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jagdish N. Bhagwati, Free Trade Today (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003);

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joseph E. Stiglitz and Andrew Charlton, Fair Trade For All: How Trade Can Promote Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peter Singer, ‘Famine, Affluence and Morality’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 1, No. 3 (Spring 1972), pp.229–43;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peter Unger, Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Douglas H. Boucher, The Paradox of Plenty: Hunger in a Bountiful World (Oakland: Institute for Food and Development Policy/Food First Books, 1999), p.334. A halving of malnutrition by 2015 is also one of the UN’s Millennium development Goals. More recently, see Declaration of the High-Level Conference on World Food Security from the June 2008 Food Summit in Rome, which contains the following: ‘Members of WTO reaffirm their commitment to the rapid and successful conclusion of the WTO Doha Development Agenda and reiterate their willingness to reach comprehensive and ambitious results that would be conducive to improving food security in developing countries. Implementing an aid for trade package should be a valuable complement to the Doha Development Agenda to build and improve the trading capacity of the developing countries.’ Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/foodclimate/HLCdocs/declaration-E.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  20. UN Food and Agriculture Organisation, ‘Soaring Food Prices: Facts, Perspectives, Impacts and Actions Required’, April 2008, p.4. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/foodclimate/HLCdocs/HLC08-inf-1-E.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  21. FAO Newsroom, ‘FAO sees major shift to bioenergy: Pressure building for switch to biofuels’, 25 April 2006. Available at: http://www.fao.org/news-room/en/news/2006/1000282/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  22. UN News Centre, ‘Global food crisis could have been avoided — UN development experts’, 6 May 2008. Available at: http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=26578&Cr=food&Cr1=crisis

    Google Scholar 

  23. Government of Australia, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (press release), ‘Asian animal protein demand creates opportunities for Australian agriculture: Report’, 4 December 2007. Available at: http://www.rirdc.gov.au/pub/media_releases/4dec07.html

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peter Wilkin, ‘Against Global Governance? Tracing the Lineage of the Anti-Globalisation Movement’, in Feargal Cochrane, Rosaleen Duffy and Jan Selby (eds) Global Governance, Conflict and Resistance (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003), pp.78–95.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jörg Friedrichs, ‘Global Governance as the Hegemonic Project of Transatlantic Civil Society’, in Markus Lederer and Philipp S. Müller (eds) Criticizing Global Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp.45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed Books, 2002);

    Google Scholar 

  27. Susanne Soederberg (2006) Global Governance in Question: Empire, Class and the New Common Sense in Managing North-South Relations (London: Pluto Press, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jagdish Bhagwati, In Defense of Globalization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005);

    Google Scholar 

  29. Martin Wolf, Why Globalization Works (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Azizur Rahman Khan and Carl Riskin, Inequality and Poverty in China in the Age of Globalization (Oxford University Press, 2001);

    Google Scholar 

  31. World Bank, The Cost of Pollution in China: Estimates of Economic and Physical Damage (Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Jim Whitman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whitman, J. (2009). Global governance systems must deal with or be able to accommodate large-scale violations/disruptions. In: The Fundamentals of Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234338_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics