Skip to main content

Part of the book series: St Antony’s Series ((STANTS))

  • 83 Accesses

Abstract

In 1830, the long struggle against the Turks ended favourably with the creation of an independent Greek state, but with the exclusion of Thessaly, Epirus, Crete, Macedonia, the Ionian Islands and parts of Asia Minor from the newly established state’s borders, and the elimination from the new state of such a large proportion of Greeks. Less than a third of the Greek population of the Ottoman Empire was contained in the borders of the Greek kingdom, thus creating tensions that would plague Greece throughout the nineteenth century.1 Those factors for those Greeks who found themselves enclosed in the borders of this kingdom and who remained faithful to the Orthodox Church, simply meant that the state did not include the entire Hellenic nation. The nation was all the Hellenes (Hellenic men) and Hellenides (Hellenic women) living in the kingdom of Greece and those living in the Ottoman Empire.2 The Megale Idea, the liberation and unification of the Hellenic genos and the establishment of a great Greek state in the lands that had once formed part of the Byzantine Empire with Constantinople as its capital, was the mission, according to contemporary intellectuals, that both Hellenes and Hellenides had in the name of history and God to accomplish. The kingdom’s mission, then, was to bring about the enlightenment, through Greek language and literature, of the East, a mission whereby intellectuals hoped to maintain the homogeneous culture and thus prepare the ground for what they assumed was a mere question of time: the political unification of the entire Hellenic genos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. G. Augustinos, Consciousness and History. Nationalist Critics of Greek Society 1897–1914 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1977), p. 13

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Clogg, A Concise History of Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Dimaras, Neoellenikos Diafotismos (Athens: Ermis, 1985), pp. 1–119

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Dimaras, Konstantinos Paparrigopoulos. I Epohi tou-I Zoi tou-To Ergo tou (Athens: Morfotiko Idrima Ethinis Trapezis, 1986), pp. 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Papadopoulos-Vretos, ‘Vivliographikes Paratiriseis epi tou Sygrammatos tou Zampeliou “Asmata Dimotika”’, Pandora, III (1852) 403–406

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Asopios, ‘Egathidrisis ton Arhon tou Panepistimiou’, Pandora, XII (1861) 317–318

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Karousou, ‘Tina ta kentra tis Ethnikis Enoseos’, Pandora, V (1854) 63–66

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Dimaras, Hellenikos Romantismos (Athens: Ermis, 1985), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Papadopoulos, ‘Logos peri tou en Vlahois Hellenismou’, Helleniko Ekpaidevtirio, X (Athens, 1859) 12

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Stathopoulou, Stoiheiodi mathimata tis Geografias. In C. Coulouri (ed), Istoria kai Geografia sta Hellenika Sholeia (1839–1914) (Geniki Gramateia Neas Geneias: Athens, 1988), pp. 155–60

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Dragoumis, ‘Apospasma Ipomnimaton Anekdoton’, Pandora, V (1856) 149–153

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. Freariti, ‘Vivliokrisia. To mellon iti peri anatrofis kai paidevseos ypo D. Stroumpou’, Pandora, V (1855) 525–532

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Vamvas, ‘Prosphonisis’, Helleniko Ekpaidevtirio, II (1852) 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Paparrigopoulos, ‘To en to panepistimio mathima tis istorias tou Hellenikou ethnous’, Pandora, VIII (1855) 555–560.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Zampelios, Asmata Dimotika tis Hellados Ekdothenta meta Meletis Peri Mesaionikou Hellenismou (Corfu, 1852), p. 464. However, the introduction of the term Hellenochristianikos by S. Zampelios in Greek literature was for the first time noted by Dimaras, Hellenikos Romantismos, p. 378; G. Vitilis, ‘Politikos vios tou Vasileiou tis Hellados 1861 and 1862’, Ethniko Imerologio, I (1863) 83

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Papadopoulos, ‘Logos ekfonithis en Helliniko Ekpaidevtirio’, Helleniko Ekpaidevtirio, I (1850) 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K.T. Karousos, ‘Logos eisagogikos’, Pandora, III (1856) 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. Vamvas, ‘Ekthesis Hellinikou Ekpaidevtiriou 1852–53’, Helleniko Ekpaidevtirio, III (1853) 30.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Pappadopoulos, ‘Logos peri tou Hellenikou Ekpaidevtiriou’, Helleniko Ekpaidevtirio, I (1850) 3–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. Pappadopoulos, ‘Logos ekfonithis ti 24 Iouniou 1851’, Helleniko Ekpaidevtirio, II (1851) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K.A. Papazafeiropoulou, ‘Peri patriotismou’, Pandora, V (1854) 366–368.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zampelios, Asmata Dimotika tis Hellados, pp. 13-15; K. Kostis, ‘Logos K. Kosti Ekfonithis kata to mnimosinon to telesthen ti 3 Fevrouariou 1874 yper Gr. Pappadopoulou’, O en Athinais Pros Diadosi ton Hellenikon Grammaton Syllogos [thereafter abbreviated to A.D.H.S.], A.D.H.S., III (1873–1874) 102–110.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Dimaras, Konstantinos Paparigopoulos. Prolegomena (Athens: Ermis, 1970), pp. 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Paparigopoulos, ‘To en to panepistimio mathima tis istorias tou Hellenikou ethnous’, Pandora, V (1855) 555–560.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dimaras, Konstantinos Paparigopoulos, pp. 69-80; E. Skopetea, To Protypo Vasileio kai I Megali Idea. Opseis tou Ethnikou provlimatos stin Hellada, 1830–1880 (Athens: Polytypo, 1988), p. 183

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Paparigopoulos, ‘I Orthodoxos Anatoliki Eklisia’, Pandora, IV (1853) 162–174.

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Asopios, ‘Logos peri tou Helenikou Ekpaidevtiriou 29 Iouniou 1850’, Helleneniko Ekpaidevtirio, I (1850) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Antoniou, Ta Programmata tis Mesis Ekpaidevsis 1833–1929 (vol. 1), 2 vols. (Athens: Geniki Gramateia Neas Geneias, 1987), pp. 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. Kostis, Ekatontaetiris tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias (1836–1936). I idrysi, I Istoria tis, I drasi tis kai ai epidioxeis tis (Athens: Filekpaidevtiki Etaireia, 1936), pp. 9–28.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ziogou-Karastergiou, I Mesi Ekpaidevsi, pp. 83-88; C. Vafas, ‘Synelevsis tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias genomeni tin 14 Martiou 1848’, Filekpaidevtiki Etaireia [thereafter abbreviated to F.E.], F.E., XI (1848) 32.

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. Vamvas, ‘Synelevsis tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias genomeni tin 13 Noemvriou 1846’, F.E., VI (1846), pp. 8–23

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. Apostolides, Egathidrisis tou Sholeiou ton Korasion tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias. In E. Fournaraki (ed.), Ekpaidevsi kai Agogi ton Koristion. Hellenikoi Provlimatismoi. Ena Anthologio (Athens: Geniki Gramateia Neas Geneias, 1987), pp. 103–106

    Google Scholar 

  33. N. Vamvas, ‘Synelevsis tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias genomeni tin 13 Noemvriou 1846’, F.E., IX (1846) 17.

    Google Scholar 

  34. L. Melas, ‘Pros tin Geniki Synelevsi tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias’, F.E., XXVII (1864) 53

    Google Scholar 

  35. ‘Geniki Synelevsis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias 25 Ianouariou 1870’, F.E., XXXIII (1870), 12; Ziogou-Karastergiou, I Mesi Ekpaidevsi, p. 105; G. Vionis, Logos ekfonithis en ti eorti tis Pentikontaetiridos tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias ypo G.Vioni Epoptou ton Sholeion Avtis (F.E: Athens, 1886), p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vamvas,’ synelevsis... 13 Noemvriou 1846’, 22; L. Melas, ‘Ekthesis tou epi ton Sholeion Epitropis Eisigiti L. Melas’, F.E., XXIII (1860) 48

    Google Scholar 

  37. L. Melas, ‘Pros tin Synelevsin tis Filekpaidevtikis Etaireias’, F.E., XXV (1862) 11.

    Google Scholar 

  38. L. Melas, ‘Logos sto Arsakeio’, Ephimeris ton Philomathon, IX (1861) 1727–1729

    Google Scholar 

  39. C. Filadelfevs, ‘Ekthesis peri ton Eniavsion Exetaseon tin 20 Iouniou 1865’, F.E., XXVIII (1865) 86

    Google Scholar 

  40. L. Melas, ‘Ekthesis Eisigitou tis Epi ton Sholon Epitropis L. Mela’, Ephimeris ton Philomathon, I (1862) 2047–2050

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Melas, ‘Yper tis Mnimis tou Aeimnistou Proedrou tis Etaireias A. Mavrokordatou’, F.E., XXVIII (1865) 39–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Demetra Tzanaki

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tzanaki, D. (2009). King of the Greeks or King of the Hellenes?. In: Women and Nationalism in the Making of Modern Greece. St Antony’s Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234451_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234451_2

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36097-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23445-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics