Skip to main content

Abstract

IBM CEO Tom Watson made the claim, that ‘Good design is Good Business’ at one of the first Aspen conferences on design in the 1950s (Watson and Petre, 1991). It seems generally accepted, that companies such as Apple, Alessi and SONY have gained competitive advantages from design (Dumas and Mintzberg, 1989; Kotler and Rath, 1988). Books like ‘Winning by Design’ (Walsh et al. 1992) and magazines like Business Week and newspapers such as the Financial Times have promoted the claim that investment in design as well as simply using good design enhances the competitiveness of firms. With a few notable exceptions (Blaich and Blaich, 1993; Gemser and Leenders 2001; Hertenstein, Platt and Veryzer, 2005), however, there is very limited evidence for such claims. In addition the concept of design is not well-defined and is often regarded as a superficial and superfluous fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blaich, R. and Blaich, J. 1993. Product design and corporate strategy: Managing the connection for competitive advantage. McGraw Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. Smith 2002. Brain-wise studies in neurophilosophy. A Bradford Book MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. 1979. Quasi-experimentation design & analysis issues for field settings. Mass Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Design Council 2002. Competitive advantage through design. (http://www.karo.com/portfolio/images/ideaspdf/Competitive%20Advantage%20Through%20Design.pdf) (accessed May 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Design Council 2006. Design in Britain 2005–06. (http://www.designfactfinder.co.uk/design-council/pdf/DesignInBritain200506.pdf) (accessed June 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, T. 2006. Dansk Design. Gyldendal, København.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirickx, I. and Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage, Management Science 35:12, 1504–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, A. and Mintzberg, H. 1989. Managing design: Designing management, Design Management Journal 1:1, 37–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhvervs- og Boligstyrelsen (Danish Ministry of Commerce and Construction) 2003. Designs Økonomiske Effekter (Economic effects of design) (http://www.ebst.dk/file/1638/designeffekter.pdf) (accessed June 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsen, G. 2000. Paired comparisons and designed experiments, Food Quality and Preferences 11, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsen, G. 2001. A multi-level model for preferences, Food Quality and Preferences 12, 337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemser, G. and Leenders, M. 2001. How integrating industrial design in the product development process impacts on company performance, Journal of Product Innovation Management 18:1, 28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorb, P. and Dumas, A. 1987. Silent design, Design Studies 8:3, 150–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. 2003. Bringing the corporation into corporate branding, European Journal of Marketing 37:7–8, 1041–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, P.W. and Cote, J.A. 1999. Guidelines for selecting and modifying logos, Journal of Marketing 62 Winter, 14–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertenstein, J., Platt, M. and Veryzer, R. 2005. The impact of industrial design effectiveness on corporate financial performance, Journal of Product innovation Management 22, 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J. 2002. Logos and toothpicks. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J. 2005. Shaping the future design for Hong Kong. A strategic review of design education and practice design task force, The Hong Kong Polytechnical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industrial Designers Society of America (IDSA). 2008. ID Defined, Downloaded from (http://www.idsa.org/absolutenm/templates/?a=89&z=23) (accessed October 2008)., IDSA: Dulles, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C. and Meyvis, T. 2001. Effect of brand logo complexity, repetition and spacing on processing fluency and judgement, Journal of Consumer Research 28, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P. and Rath, G. 1988. Design: a powerful but neglected tool, The Journal of Business Strategy Autumn, 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orth, U. and Malkewitz, K. 2008. Holistic package design and consumer brand impressions, Journal of Marketing 72, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman, S. 2007. Financial statement analysis and security valuation. 3rd edition, Mcgraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, S., Roy, R., Capon, C., Bruce, M., Walsh, V. and Lewis, J. 1991. The benefits and costs of investments in design: Using professional design expertise in products engineering and graphics, Report of the Design Innovation Group, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rams, D. 1995. Weniger, aber besser less but better. Jo Klatt Design+Design Verlag, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N. and Winkielman, P. 2004. Processing fluency and aestethic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceivers processing experience? Review of Personality and Social Psychology 8:4, 364–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosted, J., Lau T., Høgenhaven C., Johansen P. (2007), Concept Design, How to solve complex challenges of our time. FORA: Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Lamb, R. (ed.) Competitive strategic management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2008) The Craftsman. New Haven. CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivey, N. 2005. How art made the world a journey to the origins of human creativity. Basic Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, V., Roy, R., Bruce, M., Potter, S. (1992), Winning by Design: Technology, Product Design and International Competitiveness, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. Jr and Petre, P. 1991. Father and Son Inc. My life at IBM and beyond. Bantam Books, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F. 1986. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Gorm Gabrielsen, Kjell Grønhaug, Lynn Kahle, Tore Kristensen, Thomas Plenborg and Ricky Wilke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabrielsen, G., Grønhaug, K., Kahle, L., Kristensen, T., Plenborg, T., Wilke, R. (2010). Is Good Design Good Business?. In: Rusten, G., Bryson, J.R. (eds) Industrial Design, Competition and Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274037_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics