Abstract
It was almost inevitable that there would be a ‘counter-reaction’ against the excessive and uncritical ‘West-worship’ of the early Meiji period. There were bound to be heirs to the xenophobic samurai of the 1850s and ’60s as well as to modernists such as Fukuzawa. Some of the earliest Meiji forms of anti-modernism or anti-Westernism took rather quaint and somewhat comical forms, similar to the Luddites’ attacks on machines in early industrial England. For instance, there were samurai groups who refused to walk under telegraph lines for fear they would somehow be spiritually polluted by the electric current1; or the Buddhist priest Sada Kaiseki, who wrote a famous polemic, ‘Lamps and the Ruination of the State’ (Rampu bokokuron, early 1880s), advocating the boycott of Western goods such as oil lamps (albeit, like the Luddites, with a serious economic purpose: the protection of traditional trades and industries).
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Notes
For instance, David Rosenfield, ‘Counter-Orientalism and Textual Play in Akutagawa’s ‘The Ball’ (‘Butōkai’)’ in Japan Forum, 12(1) (2000), p. 53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Roy Starrs
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Starrs, R. (2011). The Anti-Modernist Backlash: Constructing Meiji Tradition. In: Modernism and Japanese Culture. Modernism and …. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353879_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230353879_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-34644-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-35387-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)