Skip to main content
  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

The principle of informed consent has become almost the cornerstone of medical ethics discussions in the West.1 Sometimes it seems as if no other principle in medical ethics can hold a candle to the supremacy of this principle. The principle derives its validity from the more basic principle of autonomy, which in turn is based on the even more fundamental principle of respect for persons. In fact the simplest and most profound conclusion of Annas’ and Grodin’s lengthy 1992 study of the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg is that “the need to respect the humanity and self-determination of all humans is central to the ethos not only of medicine and human experimentation but of all civilized societies.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1997 Thomas A. Kerns

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kerns, T.A. (1997). Informed Consent (1). In: Ethical Issues in HIV Vaccine Trials. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230380011_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics