Skip to main content

The Effects of Deterrence-Based Policies on Vulnerable, Traumatized Asylum Seekers and Refugees

  • Chapter
Responses to Traumatized Children
  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

The scale of refugee movements in the world today is alarming, with around twenty million people across the globe considered to be ‘of concern’ to the UNHCR (UNHCR 2004). The reasons for large-scale refugee movements are numerous, including famine, civil war and ethnic violence.1 On an individual level, the Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture documents hundreds of cases involving human rights abuses, torture, sexual exploitation, domestic violence and slavery. In 2003, the organization dealt with over 2000 individual cases (Medical Foundation 2004). Some of these applications will result in a grant of refugee status, but many more will not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Advisory Panel on Country Information (2004) ‘Commentary on October 2003 CIPU report on Somalia’, 2nd meeting, 2 March 2004. Available at: www.ind.homeoffice.co.uk/filestore/APCI2.2.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International (2004a) ‘Get it right: how Home Office decision making fails refugees’. Amnesty International, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International (2004b) ‘UK asylum — new report exposes Home Office failures causing nearly 14,000 wrong asylum decisions in one year’. Press briefing, 9 February 2004. Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asylum Aid (2003) Safe for Whom? Available at: www.asylumaid.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission Briefing (2000) ‘A new city: supporting asylum seekers and refugees in London’. July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte, W. (2000) Separated Children Coming to Western Europe: Why they Travel and How they Arrive. Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayotte, W. and Williamson, L. (2001) Separated Children in the UK. Refugee Council and Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldaccini, A. (2004) ‘Providing protection in the 21st century: refugee rights at the heart of UK asylum policy’. Asylum Rights Campaign, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2003) ‘Asylum detention needs reform’.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2004a) ‘“Prison culture” at asylum centre’. 16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2004b) ‘Asylum applications fall sharply’. 24 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2005a) ‘Asylum undercover’. 3 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2005b) ‘Benefits fail city asylum seekers’. 10 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2005c) ‘Child detention regulation urged’. 28 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, N. and Jarvis, C. (2000) Asylum Gender Guidelines. Immigration Appellate Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, I. and Meldrum, A. (2002) ‘EU agonizes over Mugabe sanctions’. Guardian Unlimited (www.guardianunlimited.co.uk), 18 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, N. (2001) ‘The Dublin Convention and rights of asylum seekers in the European Union’. In E. Guild and C. Harlow (eds), Implementing Amsterdam: Immigration and Asylum Rights in EC Law. Oxford: Hart Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, N. and Husain, R. (2003) Immigration, Asylum and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Medical Association (2002) Report on Asylum Seekers and Health. BMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholewinski, R. (1998) ‘Enforced destitution of asylum seekers in the UK’. International Journal of Refugee Law, 10(3): 462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, G. (2004) Textbook on Immigration and Asylum Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. (2003) ‘The detention of asylum-seeking families in the UK’. Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law, 17(2): 96–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, H. (2001) Refugees and Gender: Law and Process. Bristol: Jordan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, H. and Lester, T. (2005) No Place for a Child. February. Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, M. and Salinsky, S. (2001) Protection not Prison: Torture Survivors Detained in the UK. September, Medical Foundation for the Care of Victims of Torture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, J. (2002) A Case of Change: How Refugee Children in England are Missing Out. Refugee Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M. (2001) On Immigration and Refugees. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission Communication to the European Parliament (2004) ‘Improving access to durable solutions’ 4 June. COM (2004) 410.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Council on Refugees and Exiles, Amnesty International and Others (2004) ‘Call for withdrawal of asylum procedures directive’. Letter to Mr Vittorino, 22 March 2004. Available at: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/mar/ngo-asylum-leter.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabbricotti, A. (1998) ‘The concept of inhuman or degrading treatment in international law and its application in asylum cases’. International Journal of Refugee Law, 10(4): 637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazal, M. and Stein, A. (2003) Mental Health of Refugee Children: Comparative Study. May 2003 Section of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete, L. (2003) ‘The EU’s new border control programme’. Independent Race and Refugee News Network, 27 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin-Gill, G. (1996) The Refugee in International Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorlick, B (1999) ‘The Convention and the Committee Against Torture: a complementary protection regime for refugees’. International Journal of Refugee Law, 11(3): 479–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (2000) The Uninvited: Refugees at the Rich Man’s Gate. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. (2000) Seeking Asylum in the UK: Problems and Prospects. London: Lexis Nexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, J. (1991) The Law of Refugee Status. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayter, T. (2000) Open Borders. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP (2003a) Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons. Report on Dungavel. August. HMI 042/2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP (2003b) ‘Introduction and summary of findings: inspection of five immigration service custodial establishments’. April. HMIP, Home Office. A summary of the report is available at: http://www.medact.org/content/refugees/dungavel_14aug2003.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2003a) ‘“Sale country list” expanded to cut asylum abuse’. 17 June. Available at: www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/news.asp?NewsID=283

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2003b) ‘Asylum statistics: 3rd quarter 2003’. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office. (2004) ‘Asylum statistics: 3rd quarter 2004’. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope Hanlan Interview October 2000. In Exile. Refugee Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosin, A. (2001) ‘Children of traumatized and exiled refugee families: resilience and vulnerability’. Medicine, Conflict and Survival, 17: 137–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, F. and Liebaut, J. (eds) (1998) Detention of Asylum Seekers in Europe: Analysis and Perspectives. Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Immigration Advisory Service (2003) Home Office Country Assessment: an Analysis. Available at: www.iasuk.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Race Relations (2000) ‘The dispersal of xenophobia’. European Race Bulletin, 33/34, 2000. www.irr.org.uk

  • Jesuit Refugee Service (2004) Detention in Europe. JRS Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. and Breslin, J. P. (2004) ‘Home office tells “foolhardy” asylum seekers: “It’s your own fault you’ve been persecuted”’. Sunday Herald, 26 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Committee on Human Rights (2004) 5th Report 2003–4. 10 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, D. (1996) Haven or Hell: Asylum Policies and Refugees in Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N. and Meldgaard, L. (2005) The End of the Road. Barnados.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundnani, A. (2003) ‘Analysis: the quarterly asylum statistic’. Independent Race and Refugee News Network. 1 December. www.irr.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumley, R. (2003) Children in Detention. Refugee Council Policy Paper. Refugee Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, J., Culter, S. and Stancer, C. (2002) ‘A crying shame: pregnant asylum seekers and their babies in detention’. Maternity Alliance. www.maternityalliance.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Foundation lor the Care of Victims of Torture (2004a) Opening Doors: Annual Review 2003–4 www.torturecare.org.uk. See also (2004b) Implementation of Reception Directive. Medical Foundation Response. December 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollard, C. (2001) Asylum: the Truth Behind the Headlines. Oxfam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. (2000) The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game of European Asylum Policy? UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, F. and Twomey, P. (eds) (1998) Current Issues of UK Asylum Law and Policy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, F. and Twomey, P. (eds) (1999) Refugee Rights and Realities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OFSTED (2003) The Education of Asylum-seeker Pupils. HMI 453, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Nions, H. (2002) ‘A litmus test for civil society’. The Guardian Unlimited, 31 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phuong, C. (2002) ‘Persecution by non-state agents: comparative judicial interpretations of the 1951 Refugee Convention’. European Journal of Migration and Law, 4(4): 521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refugee Council (2003) Response to the Government’s Green Paper: ‘Every Child Matters’. November. www.refugeecouncil.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Refugee Council (2004) Hungry and Homeless: the Impact of the Withdrawal of State Support on Asylum Seekers, Refugee Communities and the Voluntary Sector. April. www.refugeecouncil.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Refugee Legal Centre (2003) ‘Response to national audit office study on asylum: deciding applications for asylum’. Available at: www.refugee-legal-centre.org.uk/NAO010703.doc

    Google Scholar 

  • Refugee Women’s Resource Project. (2004) Safe for Whom? Women’s Human Rights Abuses and Protection in ‘Safe List’ Countries: Albania, Jamaica and Ukraine. Asylum Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. (1999) ‘Unaccompanied refugee children in the UK’. International Journal of Refugee Law, 11(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, J. (2003) Working with Refugee Children. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton, S. (2000) Separated Children in Europe: a programme for Action. Save the Children and UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Save the Children and the Scottish Refugee Council (2000) I Didn’t Come Here for Fun. Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, L. (2000) ‘A comparative analysis of the asylum policy of seven European governments’. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(1): 118–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P. (2000) Refugees, Race and the Legal Concept of Asylum in Britain. London: Cavendish.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, K. (2001) Cold Comfort: Young Separated Refugees in England. Save the Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statewatch Press Release (2004) ‘Analysis: “Killing me softly? Improving durable solutions”: doublespeak and the dismantling of refugee protection in the EU’. Statewatch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. (2004) UK Asylum Law and Policy. London: Sweet and Maxell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, A. (2004) ‘Asylum operation racist say law lords’. The Guardian Unlimited, 10 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuitt, P. (1996) False Images: the Law’s Construction of the Refugee. Pluto UNCRC Committee on the Rights of the Child: consideration of report submitted by the UK. UN Doc CRC/C/15/add.34 (8th session 1995) and 2nd report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child by the UK. HMSO 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Study (2000) Replacement Migration: Is it a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations? Population Division of the Department of Social and Economic Affairs, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR (1992) Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status. UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR (1997) Guidelines on Policies and Procedures Dealing with Unaccompanied Children Asylum Seeking. UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR (1999) Guidelines on Applicable Criteria and Standards Relating to the Detention of Asylum Seekers. Februry. UNHCR.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR (2000) The State of the World’s Refugees: Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR (2002) http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home

  • UNHCR (2004) ‘Refugees by number 2003’. UNHCR. http://www.unhcr.org/cgibin/texis/vtx/home

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2001) ‘Refugee and asylum seeking children’. May. Briefing. UNICEF. www.unicef.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesener, C. and Corrigan, P. (2004) ‘Measuring misery — detention of asylum seekers in Northern Ireland: a statistical analysis 2002–2004’. 17 June. Refugee Action Group, Belfast. Available at: http://www.amnesty.org.uk/images/ul/M/Measuring_Misery.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetter, R., Griffiths, D., Ferretti, S. and Pearl, M. (2003) An Assessment of the Impact of Asylum Policies in Europe 1990–2000. Home Office Research Study 259.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Helen O’Nions

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Nions, H. (2007). The Effects of Deterrence-Based Policies on Vulnerable, Traumatized Asylum Seekers and Refugees. In: Hosin, A.A. (eds) Responses to Traumatized Children. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625808_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics