Skip to main content
  • 103 Accesses

Abstract

This study of missing bodies in Victorian fiction commenced with the enigmatic fate of M. Paul Emanuel in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette. Perpetually shipwrecked, M. Paul is purposefully suspended in the narrative. Originally planning to have her hero killed off, Brontë appeased her father’s desire for the heroine’s potentially happy ending by producing a plot “puzzle” that all readers must attempt to solve for themselves: is M. Paul dead or does he return to Lucy Snowe? Writing Death and Absence demonstrates that the desire for return, for resurrection, is embedded in Victorian fiction. The fact that death is not always final in literature, and that readers can participate in resurrecting a character from mortal oblivion, is innately satisfying. We can thereby understand Rev. Brontë’s displeasure with Villette’s original ending.1 As this study has shown, missing bodies, fictional autobiographies, and the textually dead or missing all demand some form of obituary or embodiment. It is appropriate, then, that Writing Death and Absence concludes with a dramatizes an eternally “missing” character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Earle Davis, The Flint and the Flame: The Artistry of Charles Dickens (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1963), 283

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sylvère Monod, Dickens the Novelist (Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1968), 502.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steven Connor, “Dead? Or Alive?: Edwin Drood and the Work of Mourning,” Dickensian 89 (1993), 92. I am indebted to Connor’s argument regarding the fragment and endings.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a helpful discussion of writing and mortality, see J. Gerald Kennedy, Poe, Death, and the Life of Writing (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G.K. Chesterton, Appreciations and Criticisms of the Works of Charles Dickens (London: Dent, 1933 edition), 223.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a brief assessment of aesthetic views regarding Dickens’s intended conclusion to the novel, see David Parker’s “Drood Redux: Mystery and the Art of Fiction,” Dickens Studies Annual 24 (1996): 185–95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charles Dickens, The Mystery of Edwin Drood (London: Penguin, 2002), 60. Subsequent references will cite this edition.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nancy K. Hill, A Reformer’s Art: Dickens’ Picturesque and Grotesque Imagery (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1981), 136. Incidentally, Dickens authored his own will (which is an appendix in Forster’s biography) and burial arrangements. Though most of his requests were carried out, his burial wishes were overlooked, and instead of being buried at Rochester Cathedral (the model for Cloisterham) next to his father, he was interred in Westminster Abbey in accordance with his family’s wishes. It is an ironic turn in the life of a man who so desperately tried to author his own exit.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anny Sadrin, Parentage and Inheritance in the Novels of Dickens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), 121.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walter Ong, Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1977), 238.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. K. Chesterton, Charles Dickens (New York: Dodd Mead, 1906), 243.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Angus P. Collins, “Dickens and Our Mutual Friend: Fancy as Self Preservation,” Études Anglaises 38, no. 3(1985): 257–65. Quote from 258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Jolene Zigarovich

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zigarovich, J. (2012). Edwin Drood: The Preeminent Missing Body. In: Writing Death and Absence in the Victorian Novel. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137007032_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics