Abstract
From the mid-1970s to the mid-1980s, there was a vibrant debate within feminist scholarship in both the humanities and the social sciences about the relationship between Marxist theory and feminism. Following on Juliet Mitchell’s call in the late 1960s for a socialist criticism that took seriously “the subordination of women and the need for their liberation,”1 feminists tried to grapple with concepts like ideology, exchange, labor, and class struggle, and ask if and when they could be applied to oppressions in women’s social conditions, collected under the umbrella term of patriarchy, or if women’s forms of subordination were so culturally specific that they needed their own, independent rubric.2 Feminists also contested that the capitalist-proletariat relationship posed by Marx made class into a singular, overriding, and abstract concept for identity that wiped out both difference and experience. Heidi Hartmann, for example, famously reproves, “the categories of Marxism are sex-blind.”3 In about 1985, such inquiry lost its fervor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
Althusser, Louis. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation).” In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books, 1971, pp. 123–173.
Delphy, Christine. Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression. Trans. Diana Leonard. London: Hutchinson, 1970.
DeParle, Jason. “Two Classes, Divided by ‘I Do’.” The New York Times (July 14, 2012): http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/us/two-classes-in-america-divided-by-i-do.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed: July 31, 2012.
Eisenstein, Hester. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women’s Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, CO, and London: Paradigm Publishers, 2009.
Engels, Friedrich. The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. Trans. Alick West (proofed and corrected by Mark Harris, 2010). www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/origin_family.pdf. Accessed: April 1, 2011.
Fortunati, Leopoldina. The Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital. Trans. Hilary Creek. Ed. Jim Fleming. New York: Autonomedia, 1995.
Gimenez, Martha E. “Connecting Marx and Feminism in the Era of Globalization: A Preliminary Investigation.” Socialism and Democracy 18, 1 (September 2010): 85–105.
Hartmann, Heidi. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union.” In Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism. Ed. Lydia Sargent. Montreal, QC: Black Rose Books, 1981, pp. 1–41.
Hartsock, Nancy. The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays. Boulder, CO, and Oxford, UK: Westview Press, 1998.
Hegewisch, Ariane; Williams, Claudia; and Edwards, Angela. “Insitute for Women’s Policy Research Fact Sheet: The Gender Gap: 2012.” http://www.iwpr.org/publications/pubs/the-gender-wage-gap-2012/. Accessed: March 8, 2013.
Kuhn, Annette. “Structures of Patriarchy and Capital in the Family.” In Feminism and Materialism: Women and Modes of Production. London, Henley, UK, and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978, pp. 42–67.
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, Second Edition. London and New York: Verso, 1985.
Marx, Karl. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft). Trans. Martin Nicolaus. London and New York: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review, 1973.
Marx, Karl; and Engels, Friedrich. “The German Ideology, Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy.” In The Marx-Engels Reader, Second Edition. Ed. Robert C. Tucker. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1978, pp. 146–200.
Mitchell, Juliet. “Women: The Long Revolution.” New Left Review 40 (November—December 1966): 11–37.
Mitchell, Juliet. Psychoanalysis and Feminism: A Radical Reassessment of Freudian Psychoanalysis, New Edition. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
Rubin, Gayle. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Towards an Anthropology of Women. Ed. Rayna R. Reiter. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1976, pp. 157–210.
Weeks, Kathi. The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 2011.
Wolf, Naomi. “The Paycheck Fairness Act’s Realpolitik.” Guardian (June 8, 2012): http:www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/08/paycheck-fairness-act-realpolitik. Accessed: June 10, 2012.
Young, Iris. “Beyond the Unhappy Marriage: A Critique of the Dual Systems Theory.” In Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage ofMarxism and Feminism. Ed. Lydia Sargent. Montreal, QC: Black Rose Books, 1981, pp. 43–69.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Ron Scapp and Brian Seitz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodman, R.T. (2013). Feminist Theory and the Critique of Class. In: Scapp, R., Seitz, B. (eds) Living with Class. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326799_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137326799_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-32681-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32679-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)