Skip to main content

Views of Banking Ethics

  • Chapter
Ethics in Banking
  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

Much of the current financial structure can be traced to three innovations in the 17th century. The first of these was the establishment of a system of bank transfers that has survived to this day in the form of cheque issuance and inter-bank transfers. The second was the foundation of fractional reserve banking that enabled banks to lend substantially more than the amount of deposits they carried on their books. The third was the creation of the Bank of England as the official issuer of bank notes, which were initially backed by gold bullion, and the keeper of bank reserves. The modus operandi of banking was twofold: on the one hand, a bank had to be able to guarantee its depositors that they could withdraw their money whenever they wanted; on the other hand, the same bank had to lend the funds out so it could generate income in order to be able to pay interest to encourage the depositors to place their funds. The three innovations were the original measures that made possible the institution of modern banking.1 Essentially reserve banking means that, if the reserve requirement is, for example, 10 per cent, a bank can lend out 90 per cent of say $100, that is $90, to another person who may deposit that amount at another bank, which in turn can lend out $81 to a third person, and this goes on to the next bank and borrower. The initial deposit of $100 has created loans of $171 and is capable of creating even further loans, so this is called the ‘multiplier effect’ in money creation, and this allows banks to greatly expand lending.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Timothy D. Barnes, Constantine and Eusebius ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981 ), p. 536.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John T. Noonan, The Scholastic Analysis of Usury ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957 ), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Aristotle, The Politics, trans. Ernest Barker (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995 ), p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adrian Walsh and Tony Lynch, The Morality of Money: An Exploration in Analytic Philosophy ( Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008 ), p. 95.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Antony Flew, ‘The Profit Motive’, Ethics 86, no. 4 (1976): p. 314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emma Rothschild, Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment, first paperback ed. ( Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002 ), p. 116.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (London, UK: George Routledge & Sons, 1776; reprint, 1893), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rothschild, Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adam Smith, ‘The Theory of Moral Sentiments’, in The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith vol. I,, eds D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie, ( London, UK: Oxford University Press, 1976 ), pp. 184–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stephen Darwall, ‘Consequentialism’, in Blackwell Readings in Philosophy, ed. Stephen Cahn (Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2003 ), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Samuel Scheffler, The Rejection of Consequentialism ( London, UK: Oxford University Press, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norman E. Bowie, Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective (Malden, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1999 ).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Immanuel Kant, The Moral Law or Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, trans. H. J. Paton ( London, UK: Hutchinson, 1948 ), p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christine M. Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends ( Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1996 ), p. 14.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Norman E. Bowie, ‘A Kantian Approach to Business Ethics’, in A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. Robert E. Frederick ( Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Onora O’Neill, Constructions of Reason (Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy) ( New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1989 ), p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matthew C. Altman, ‘The Decomposition of the Corporate Body: What Kant Cannot Contribute to Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 74 (2007): p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  18. John R. Danley, ‘Corporate Moral Agency’, in A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. Robert E. Frederick ( Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peter A. French, ‘Corporate Moral Agency’, in Blackwell Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, eds Patricia Werhane and R. Edward Freeman ( Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1997 ), pp. 148–51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Soares, ‘Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics 46, no. 2 (2003): p. 145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971 ), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jean Hampton, ‘Rational Choice and the Law’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 15, no. 3 (1992): p. 667.

    Google Scholar 

  23. David Gauthier, Moral Dealing ( Ithaca, NY; London, UK: Cornell University Press, 1990 ), p. 233.

    Google Scholar 

  24. David Gauthier, Morals by Agreement ( Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1986 ), p. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other, 2nd ed. ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998 ), pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas Donaldson and Thomas W. Dunfee, ‘Social Contract Approaches to Business Ethics: Bridging the “Is - Ought” Gap’, in A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. Robert E. Frederick ( Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Richard Marens, ‘Returning to Rawls: Social Contracting, Social Justice, and Transcending the Limitations of Locke’, Journal of Business Ethics 75, no. 1 (2007): p. 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Daniel Nyberg, ‘The Morality of Everyday Activities: Not the Right, but the Good Thing to Do’, Journal of Business Ethics 81 (2007): p. 587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dennis J. Moberg, ‘Practical Wisdom and Business Ethics’, Business Ethics Quarterly 17, no. 3 (2007): p. 536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. John R. Boatright, ‘Finance Ethics’, in A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. Robert E. Frederick ( Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2002 ).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ronald F. Duska and James J. Clarke, ‘Ethical Issues in Financial Services’, in The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, ed. Norman E. Bowie ( Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2001 ).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robert C. Solomon, ‘Trusting’, in Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus, eds Mark Wrathall and Jeff Malpas (Cambridge, MA; London, UK: MIT Press, 2000 ), p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2015 Jes Villa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Villa, J. (2015). Views of Banking Ethics. In: Ethics in Banking. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137340283_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics