Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Competing Conceptions of Victims of Domestic Violence within Legal Processes

  • Chapter
Crime, Victims and Policy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

Abstract

It is well established that victims of crime are often measured against an idealised standard of victimhood, typically to the detriment of those who are seen to depart in significant ways from notions of the ideal. However, as Paul Rock noted (2002, p. 17), we need to give more attention to the ways in which various framing discourses are deployed and give shape to our understandings of victimisation. There is ‘interpretative work done at every level in bringing the categories victim and offender into play’ (Rock 2002, p. 21). Laws and legal practices are significant in how matters are framed and in constituting the subjects and objects of law. In this chapter we examine this further by reference to the multiple and competing conceptions of the victim of domestic violence that emerge in different domains of legal practice. We focus on victims of domestic violence who as mother are more likely to be subjected to particular scrutiny and to competing, and often conflicting, requirements and obligations (Douglas and Walsh 2010; Hester 2010; Jaffe et al. 2003; Kaye et al. 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allard, S. 1991. Rethinking Battered Woman Syndrome: A Black Feminist Perspective. UCLA Women’s Law Journal 1(1), pp. 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALRC (Australian Law Reform Commission). 2012. Family Violence and Commonwealth Laws — Improving Legal Frameworks. ALRC Report 117. Sydney: ALRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • ALRC and NSWLRC (Australian Law Reform Commission&the New South Wales Law Reform Commission), 2010. Family Violence — A National Legal Response. Final Report, ALRC Report 114, NSWLRC Report 128 Sydney: ALRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T., Sheehan, R., Frederico, M. and Hewitt, L. 2001. Resolving Family Violence to Children: The Evaluation of Project Magellan, a Pilot Project for Managing Family Court Residence and Contact Disputes when Allegations of Child Abuse have been made. Family Violence and Family Court Research Program, Melbourne: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buel, S. 2003. Effective Assistance of Counsel for Battered Women Defendants: A Normative Construct. Harvard Women’s Law Journal 26, pp. 217–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, K. 1990. Fallen Angels: The Representation of Violence against Women in Legal Culture. International Journal of the Sociology of Law 18(2), pp. 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, K. 2008. In an Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement against Sexual Violence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzawa, E.S. and Buzawa, C.G. 2002. Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J., Rose, L., Kub, J. and Nedd, D. 1998. Voices of Strength and Resistance: A Contextual and Longitudinal Analysis of Women’s Responses to Battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 13(6), pp. 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comack, E. 1987. Women Defendants and the ‘Battered Wife Syndrome’: A Plea for the Sociological Imagination. Crown Counsel Review 5(11), pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comack, E. and Brickey, S. 2007. Constituting the Violence of Criminalized Women. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 49(1), pp. 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy, M., Perks, K., Scott, E. and Tweedale, R. 2012. Picking up the Pieces: Domestic Violence and Child Contact. Rights of Women and CWASU. London: Rights of Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. 1991. Mapping the Margins: Identity Politics, Intersectionality, and Violence against Women. Stanford Law Review 43(6), pp. 1243–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. 2001. Conflict, Politics and Crime: Aboriginal Communities and the Police. Sydney: Allen&Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. and Schwartz, M. 2009a. Civil and Family Law Needs of Indigenous People in New South Wales: The Priority Areas. University of New South Wales Law Journal 32(3), pp. 725–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. and Schwartz, M. 2009b. From Crisis to Crime: The Escalation of Civil and Family Law Issues to Criminal Matters in Aboriginal Communities in NSW. Indigenous Law Bulletin 7(15), pp. 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunneen, C. and Stubbs, J. 2004. Cultural Criminology: Engaging with Race, Gender and Post-colonial Identities. In: Ferrell, J., Hayward, K., Morrison, W. and Presdee, M. eds. Cultural Criminology Unleashed. London: Glasshouse Press, pp. 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. 1994. Criminal Law and Justice System Practices as Racist, White and Racialized. Washington and Lee Law Review 51(2), pp. 431–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. and Stephens, D. 1995. The Dark Figure of Criminology: Towards a Black and Multi-ethnic Feminist Agenda for Theory and Research. In: Rafter, N.H. and Heidensohn, F. eds. International Feminist Perspectives in Criminology. Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 189–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. 2012. A Consideration of the Merits of Specialized Homicide Offences and Defences for Battered Women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 45(3), pp. 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. and Godden, L. 2002. The Decriminalisation of Domestic Violence. Brisbane: Griffith University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, H. and Walsh, T. 2010. Mothers, Domestic Violence and Child Protection: Toward Collaboration and Engagement. Violence Against Women 16(5), pp. 537–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durfee, A. 2010. The Gendered Paradox of Victimization and Agency in Protection Order Filings. In: Garcia, V. and Clifford, J. eds. Female Victims of Crime: Reality Reconsidered. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M.A. 1993. Understanding Women’s Responses to Domestic Violence: A Redefinition of Battered Women Syndrome. Hofstra Law Review 21(4), pp. 1191–1242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Family Law Council (2012), Improving the Family Law System for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Clients. Barton ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzroy, L. 2001. Violent Women: Questions for Feminist Theory, Practice and Policy. Critical Social Policy 21(1), pp. 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodey, J. 2000. An Overview of Key Themes. In: Crawford, A. and Goodey, J. eds. Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice. Dartmouth: Ashgate, pp. 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, R. and Morgan, J. 2002. The Hidden Gender of Law. 2nd ed. Leichhardt: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C. 2008. Implacably Hostile or Appropriately Protective?: Women Managing Child Contact in the Context of Domestic Violence. Violence Against Women 14(4), pp. 381–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. 2010. Commentary on ‘Mothers, Domestic Violence, and Child Protection,’ by Heather Douglas and Tamara Walsh. Violence Against Women 16(5), pp. 516–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. 2011. The Three Planet Model: Towards an Understanding of Contradictions in Approaches to Women and Children’s Safety in Contexts of Domestic Violence. British Journal of Social Work 41(5), pp. 837–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, D. and Kaspiew, R. 2011. Child Protection and Family Law … Joining the Dots. National Child Protection Clearinghouse Issues No.34, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. 2010. Female Offending: Has there been an Increase? Crime and Justice Statistics Bureau Brief, issue paper no. 46. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • HREOC (Human Rights&Equal Opportunity Commission ) 1997. Bringing them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families. Sydney: HREOC.

    Google Scholar 

  • HREOC (Human Rights&Equal Opportunity Commission) 2004. Aboriginal&Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. Social Justice Report 2003. Sydney: HREOC. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/our-work/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-social-justice/publications/social-justice-report-10 [Accessed 9 March 2015].

  • Hunter, R. 2008. Domestic Violence Law Reform and Women’s Experience in Court: The Implementation of Feminist Reforms in Civil Proceedings. Amhurst, NY: Cambria Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. Crooks, C. and Poisson, S. 2003. Common Misconceptions in Addressing Domestic Violence in Child Custody Disputes. Juvenile and Family Court Journal 54(4), pp. 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaganas, F. and Sclater, S.D. 2004. Contact Disputes: Narrative Constructions of “Good” Parents. Feminist Legal Studies 12(1), pp. 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaspiew, R. 2005. Violence in Contested Children’s Cases: An Empirical Exploration. Australian Journal of Family Law 19(2), pp. 112–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspiew, R., Gray, M., Weston, R., Moloney, L. Hand, K. and Qu, L. 2009. Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law Reforms. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, M., Stubbs J. and Tolmie J. 2003. Domestic Violence, Separation and Parenting: Negotiating Safety Using Legal Processes. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 15(2), pp. 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, L. 2013. ‘It’s Like this Maze you have to make your Way Through’: Women’s Experiences of Seeking a Domestic Violence Protection order in NSW. Sydney: Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, C. 1989. Women’s Experiences and the Problem Of transition: Perspectives on Male Battering of Women. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989, pp. 23–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguigan, H. 1995. Cultural Evidence and Male Violence: Are Feminist and Multiculturalist Reformers on a Collision Course in Criminal Courts? New York Law Review 70(1), pp. 36–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, L. 1997. Sexed Work: Gender, Race and Resistance in a Brooklyn Drug Market. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, R. 1991. Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation. Michigan Law Review 90(1), pp. 1–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.L. 1998. Retribution Revisited: A Reconsideration of Feminist Criminal Law Reform Strategies. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 36(1), pp. 151–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, G. 2002. The Spectacle of Violence: Homophobia, Gender, and Knowledge. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott, P., Chambers, C., Go-Sam, C. and Thomson, L. 2006. Good Practice in Indigenous Family Violence Prevention — Designing and Evaluating Successful Programs. Issues Paper: 11. Sydney: Australian Domestic&Family Violence Clearinghouse. http://www.austdvclearinghouse.unsw.edu.au/Word%20Files/Issues_Paper_11.doc [Accessed: 9 March 2015].

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S.E. 1995. Gender Violence and Legally Engendered Selves. Identities 2(1–2), pp. 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S.E. 2003. Rights Talk and the Experience of Law: Implementing Women’s Human Rights to Protection from Violence. Human Rights Quarterly 25(2), pp. 343–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. 2005. Victims as Offenders: The Paradox of Women’s Violence in Relationships. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minow, M. 1990. Words and the Door to the Land of Change: Law, Language, and Family Violence. Vanderbilt Law Review 43(6), pp. 1665–1699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney, L., Smyth, B. and Weston, R. 2007. Allegations of Family Violence and Child Abuse in Family Law Children’s Proceedings: A Pre-reform Exploratory Study. Research Report No. 15, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J and Politoff, V. 2012. Victorian Print Media Coverage of Violence Against Women: A longitudinal Study. VicHealth and the University of Melbourne. http://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au/Publications/Freedom-from-violence/Victorian-print-media-coverage-of-violence-against-women.aspx [Accessed: 9 March 2015].

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S. and Powell, A. 2011. Domestic Violence: Australian Public Policy. North Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancarrow, H. 2006. In Search of Justice for Domestic and Family Violence: Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australian Women’s Perspectives. Theoretical Criminology 10(1), pp. 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Government 2014. It Stops Here: Standing Together to end Domestic and family Violence in NSW — The NSW Government’s Domestic and Family Violence Framework for Reform. Sydney: New South Wales Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Legislative Council, Standing Committee on Social Issues Parliament of NSW. 2012. Domestic Violence Trends and Issues in NSW Inquiry. Sydney: NSW Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, D. 2000. Criminal Law and Feminism. In: Bibbings, L. and Nicolson, D. eds. Feminist Perspectives on Criminal Law. London: Cavendish Publishing, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. and Cripps, K. 2013. Child Protection and Indigenous Intimate Partner Violence: Whose Failure to Protect? In: Strega, S. Krane, J. Lapierre, S. Richardson, C. and Carlton, R. eds. Failure to Protect: Moving Beyond Gendered Responses. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing, pp. 166–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrie, A. 2001. Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, P. 2011. Family Law and the Indissolubility of Parenthood. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ptacek, J. 1999. Battered Women in the Courtroom: The Power if Judicial Responses. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. and Hester, M. 2006. Mothering through Domestic Violence. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathus, Z. 2007. Shifting the Gaze: Will Past Violence be Silenced by a Further Shift of the Gaze to the Future under the New Family Law System? Australian Journal of Family Law 21(1), pp. 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, H. 2002. The ‘No Contact Mother’: Reconstructions of Motherhood in the Era of the ‘New Father’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 16(1), pp. 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, H., Frew, C. and Swain, S. 2010. Recognition of Violence in the Family Law System: A Long Journey. Australian Journal of Family Law 24(3), pp. 296–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. 2012. Arrested Justice: Black Women, Violence, and America’s Prison Nation. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, P. 2002. On Becoming a Victim. In: Hoyle C. and Young, R. eds. New Visions of Crime Victims. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E. 1986. Describing and Changing: Women’s Self-defense Work and the Problem of Expert Testimony on Battering. Women’s Rights Law Reporter 9(3–4), pp. 195–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E. 1992. Particularity and Generality: Challenges of Feminist Theory and Practice in Work on Woman-Abuse. New York University Law Review 67(3), pp. 520–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, E. 2000. Battered Women and Feminist Lawmaking. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. 1989. Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, C. 1992. The Woman of Legal Discourse. Social and Legal Change 1(1), pp. 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snider, L. 1998. Toward Safer Societies: Punishment, Masculinities and Violence against Women. British Journal of Criminology 38(1), pp. 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N. and Dupont, I. 2005. Domestic Violence at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender — Challenges and Contributions to Understanding Violence against Marginalized Women in Diverse Communities. Violence Against Women 11(1), pp. 38–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. 2000. The Good the Bad and the Vulnerable: Fearing Victims and Victims’ Fears. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, S. 2007. Coercive Control: How Men Entrap Women in Personal Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang, H. and Sherman, L. 2003. Repairing the Harm: Victims and Restorative Justice. Utah Law Review 2003(1), pp. 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. 2002. Domestic Violence and Women’s Safety: Feminist Challenges to Restorative Justice. In: Strang, H. and Braithwaite, J. eds. Restorative Justice and Family Violence. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. and Tolmie, J. 1995. Gender, Race and the Battered Woman Syndrome: An Australian Case Study. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 8(1), pp. 122–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. and Tolmie, J. 1999. Falling Short of the Challenge? A Comparative Assessment of the Australian Use of Expert Evidence on the Battered Woman Syndrome. Melbourne University Law Review 23(3), pp. 709–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, J. and Tolmie, J. 2005. Defending Battered Women on Charges of Homicide: The Structural and Systemic Versus the Personal and Particular. In: Chan, W. et al. eds. Women, Mental Disorder and the Law. London: Glasshouse Press, pp. 191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuerkheimer, D. 2004. Recognizing and Remedying the Harm of Battering: A Call to Criminalize Domestic Violence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 94(4), pp. 959–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, S. 2006. Changing Boundaries of the ‘Victim’ in Restorative Justice: So Who is the Victim Now? In: Sullivan, D. and Tifft, L. eds. Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective. Milton Park: Routledge, pp. 273–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangmann, J. 2010. Gender and Intimate Partner Violence: A Case Study from NSW. University of New South Wales Law Journal 33(3), pp. 945–969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangmann, J. 2012. Incidents versus Context: How Does the NSW Protection Order System Understand Intimate Partner Violence? Sydney Law Review 34(4), pp. 695–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • WLS (Women’s Legal Services NSW) 2014. Women Defendants to AVOs: What is their Experience of the justice system Sydney: WLS NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. (The Hon.) 2008. Report of the Special Commission of Inquiry into Child Protection Services in NSW. Volume 1. Sydney: NSW Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahn, M. ed. 2009. The Delinquent Girl. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Julie Stubbs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane Wangmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sussex, UK

    Dean Wilson

  2. University of Melbourne, Australia

    Stuart Ross

Copyright information

© 2015 Julie Stubbs and Jane Wangmann

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stubbs, J., Wangmann, J. (2015). Competing Conceptions of Victims of Domestic Violence within Legal Processes. In: Wilson, D., Ross, S. (eds) Crime, Victims and Policy. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137383938_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation