Skip to main content
  • 208 Accesses

Abstract

State policies to incorporate immigrants and foreign residents into destination countries of East Asia, especially in South Korea (hereafter ‘Korea’) and Japan, have been institutionalized incrementally in order to respond to the increase in migration inflows. Although both Korea and Japan adhere to the identity of ‘non-immigration country’, significant policy changes to coordinate emerging issues related to cultural diversity and ethnic minorities have been extended for a decade. The Korean government established a legal scheme and policy plans to provide proper treatment to foreign residents in 2006. Furthermore, policy suggestions from civil society organizations advocating for human rights for foreign workers and foreign spouses have been selectively integrated into the agenda of central government in Korea (Yoon, 2010). Before changes in Korea, in Japan ‘multicultural coexistence’ policies initiated by several local governments were widely discussed. The term ‘multicultural coexistence’ emerged in the early 1990s, particularly in localities with a certain number of foreign residents where social integration and antidiscrimination were put on the table to alleviate the challenges faced by the Japanese vis-à-vis foreign residents (Nagy, 2008, p. 22).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aiden, H. S. (2011) ‘Creating the “Multicultural Coexistence” Society: Central and Local Government Policies towards Foreign Residents in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 14(2), 213–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleinikoff, T. A. (1999) ‘Between National and Postnational: Membership in the United States’, Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 4(Spring), 241–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asis, Maruja M. B. and Batistella, G. (2013) ‘Multicultural Realities and Membership: States, Migrations and Citizenship in Asia’, in L. A. Eng, F. L. Collins and B. Yeoh (eds) Migration and Diversity in Asian Contexts (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Attoh, K. A. (2011) ‘What Kind of Right Is the Right to the City?’, Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C. L. (1999) Women, Policy, and Politics: The Construction of Policy Problems (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baubock, R. (2003) ‘Reinventing Urban Citizenship’, Citizenship Studies, 7(2), 139–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baubock, R. and Guiraudon, V. (2009) ‘Introduction: Realignments of Citizenship: Reassessing Rights in the Age of Plural Memberships and Multi-level Governance’, Citizenship Studies, 13(5), 439–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. (2004) The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castle, S. (2007) ‘The Factors That Make and Unmake Migration Policies’, in A. Portes and J. DeWind (eds) Rethinking Migration: New Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives (New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Castle, S. and Miller, M. J. (2003) The Age of Migration, 3rd edn (New York and London: Guilford Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. (2006) ‘Discourses of Multicultural Coexistence (Tabunka Kyosei) and the “Old-Comer” Korean Residents of Japan’, Asian Ethnicity, 7(1), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, E. A. (2010a) Immigration and Citizenship in Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, E. A. (2010b) ‘Korean and Japan’s Multicultural Models for Immigrant Incorporation’, Korea Observer, 41(4), 649–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukumoto, K. (2004) ‘A Hierarchy of Citizenship: Identity Politics of Suffrage Extension and Welfare Development’, USJP Occasional Paper 04–03, Programs on U.S.-Japan Relations, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2010) Citizenship and Immigration (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalicki, K. (2008) ‘Voting Rights of the “Marginal”: The Contested Logic of Political Membership in Japan’, Ethnopolitics, 7(2–3), 265–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. H. (2009) ‘The Development of Korea’s Immigration Policies: Security, Accumulation, Fairness, and Institutional Legitimacy’, Korea Observer, 40(4), 763–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Production of Space, trans. D. Nicholson-Smith (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1996 [1968]) Writings on Cities, ed. and trans. E. Kofman and E. Lebas (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milly D. J. (2006) ‘Policy Advocacy for Foreign Residents in Japan’, in T. Tsuda (ed.) Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, Toronto and Oxford: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication (MIC) (2006) Tabunka Kyosei no Suishin ni kansuru Kenkyukai Hokokusho [Report of the Working Group on Multicultural Coexistence Promotion] (http://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000198586.pdf, accessed 10 February 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Public Administration and Security, Ministry of Employment and Labor, and Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (2011) ‘Oekukin Jeongchack Kwankyebucho Hapdong Seolmyounghoe [Joint Briefing for Government Agencies concerned with Policy for Foreigners in Korea]’ (http://www.mospa.go.kr, accessed 18 July 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy S. R. (2008) ‘Japanese Multicultural Coexistence: Emblematic of a Liberal Democratic Society?’ Paper presented to the Symposium on Socio-Political Transformation in Globalizing Asia: Integration or Conflict? (http://www.waseda-giari.jp/sysimg/rresults/456_report_1-3.pdf, accessed 10 April 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Election Commission (Korea) (2010), Survey Report of the Voter Turnout in the 5th Local Election (http://www.nec.go.kr, accessed 10 December 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2012) International Migration Outlook 2012 (OECD Publishing) (http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/migr_outlook-2012-en, accessed 10 February 2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. H. (2011) ‘Localizing Immigrant Integration Policy: An Reflection on Local Immigrant Policies in Korea’ [in Korean], Gonggan gwa Sahoe [Space and Society], 21(2), 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, M. (2003) ‘Citizenship and the Right to the Global City: Reimagining the Capitalist World Order’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 564–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seol, D. H. and Skrentny J. D. (2009) ‘Why Is There So Little Migrant Settlement in East Asia?’, International Migration Review, 43(3), 578–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipper, A. (2008) Fighting for Foreigners: Immigration and Its Impact on Japanese Democracy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Soysal, Y N. (1994) Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda, T. (2006) ‘Localities and the Struggle for Immigrant Rights: The Significance of Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration’, in T. Tsuda (ed.) Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, Toronto and Oxford: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Varsanyi, M. W. (2006) ‘Interrogating “Urban Citizenship” vis-à-vis Undocumented Migration’, Citizenship Studies, 10(2), 229–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka, G. (2006) ‘Immigrant Incorporation and Women’s Community Activities in Japan: Local NGOs and Public Education for Immigrant Children’, in T. Tsuda (ed.) Local Citizenship in Recent Countries of Immigration: Japan in Comparative Perspective (Lanham, MD, Boulder, CO, New York, Toronto and Oxford: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamanaka, G. (2010) ‘Civil Society and Social Movements for Immigrant Rights in Japan and South Korea: Convergence and Divergence in Unskilled Immigration Policy’, Korea Observer, 41(4), 615–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S.-R. and Oh, H. J. (2012) ‘Local Political Community and Resident Aliens’ Political Rights: Korean and Japanese Cases’ [in Korean], Hangook Jeongchihakhoebo [Korean Political Science Review], 46(2), 163–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, I. J. (2010) ‘Multicultural Minority Groups and Multicultural Coexistence in Korean Society’, Korea Observer, 41(4), 517–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Jung-Mee Hwang

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hwang, JM. (2014). Local Citizenship and Policy Agenda for ‘Foreign Residents’ in East Asia. In: Kim, NK. (eds) Multicultural Challenges and Sustainable Democracy in Europe and East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137403452_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics