Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Relationships between Communication, Network Structure, and Culture

  • Chapter
Applying Relational Sociology

Abstract

Sociological network research and the recent advances in “relational sociology” view social relationships as the constituent elements of social structure. Considerations about what social relationships actually are, how they form and evolve, and how they connect to wider layers of the social (like culture or networks) remain curiously rare or even absent. Much network research abstracts from the concrete meaning embodied in social relationships, taking them and their empirical significance as given (Holland and Leinhardt, 1977, p. 387), and focusing exclusively on the structure of their connections. This perspective may have its merits, but it ignores that social structures are always symbolic constructions of expectations and thus filled with “culture” (Yeung, 2005, pp. 392ff). This interweaving of network relations and culture is the main concern of relational sociology, as advanced by Harrison White, Mustafa Emirbayer, Charles Tilly, Ann Mische, and others (Pachucki and Breiger, 2010; Mische, 2011). In spite of producing a number of studies on processes in social networks, relational sociology has not developed a thorough account of social relationships. Social psychological research on personal relationships, in contrast, offers numerous insights into the processes in ties. But it does not relate them systematically to the wider social context—to the level of culture and to the immediate network of relationships around alter and ego (Duck, 1997).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bateson, G. ([1955] 2000) “A Theory of Play in Phantasy,” in Steps Toward an Ecology of Mind (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 177–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. L. and R. H. Useem (1942) “Sociological Analysis of the Dyad,” American Sociological Review 7: 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. (1988) “Uncertainty and Information Exchange in Developing Relationships,” in Handbook of Personal Relationships, ed. S. Duck (Chichester: Wiley), pp. 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. and H. Kellner (1964) “Marriage and the Construction of Reality,” Diogenes 46: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottero, W. (2009) “Relationality and Social Interaction,” British Journal of Sociology 60: 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1994) Raisons pratiques; Sur la théorie de l’action (Paris: Seuil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1982) Toward a Structural Theory of Action (New York: Academic Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (1992) “The Infrastructure of Modernity; Indirect Social Relationships, Information Technology, and Social Integration,” in Social Change and Modernity, ed. H. Haferkamp and N. Smelser (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 205–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986) “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation; Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieux Bay,” in Power, Action and Belief, ed. J. Law (London: Routledge), pp. 196–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, F. (1987) Love in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, D. and F. Harary (1956) “Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory,” Psychological Review 63: 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Beauvoir, S. (1949) Le deuxième sexe, 2 Volumes (Paris: Gallimard).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, F. (2008) “Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-Deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency,” Sociological Theory 26: 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1986) “Structural Analysis of Organizational Fields: A Blockmodel Approach,” Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 335–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1997) “Culture and Cognition,” Annual Review of Sociology 23: 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. (1990) “Relationships as Unfinished Business: Out of the Frying Pan and into the 1990s,” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 7: 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duck, S. (ed.) (1997) Handbook of Personal Relationships, 2nd edition (Chichester: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. and L. Roninger (1980) “Patron-Client Relations as a Model of Structuring Social Exchange,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22: 42–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. (1997) “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. and A. Mische (1998) “What Is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103: 963–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (1996) “Die Definition der Situation,” Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 48: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, G. A. and S. Kleinman (1983) “Network and Meaning: An Interactionist Approach to Structure,” Symbolic Interaction 6: 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, S. (2001), Against Essentialism (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhse, J. (2009) “The Meaning Structure of Social Networks,” Sociological Theory 27: 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuhse, J. and S. Mützel (2011) “Tackling Connections, Structure, and Meaning in Networks: Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Sociological Network Research,” Quality & Quantity 45: 1067–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures (London: Fontana).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. ([1959] 1990) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis; An Essay on the Organization of Experience (Boston: Northeastern University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. (1999) Personal Relationships across Cultures (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. (2002) “The Origins of Status Hierarchies: A Formal Theory and Empirical Test,” American Journal of Sociology 107: 1143–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. (2003) Collision of Wills; How Ambiguity about Social Rank Breeds Conflict (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedström, P. (2005) Dissecting the Social (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P. and S. Leinhardt (1977) “Social Structure as a Network Process,” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 6: 386–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L. (1998) Intimacy; Personal Relationships in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katovich, M. (1987) “Identity, Time, and Situated Activity: An Interactionist Analysis of Dyadic Transactions,” Symbolic Interaction 10: 187–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J.C. (1992) La trame conjugale; Analyse du couple par son linge (Paris: Nathan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (1993) “Pierre Bourdieu: Cultural Economy and Social Change,” in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, ed. C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma and M. Postone (Cambridge: Polity), pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, E. (1988) “Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action,” American Sociological Review 53: 865–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. and B. Frey (1993) “Alternatives, Frames, and Relative Prices: A Broader View of Rational Choice Theory,” Acta Sociologica 36: 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, F. and H. White (1971) “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1: 49–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. ([1981] 1998) Love as Passion (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. ([1984] 1995) Social Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1987) “The Evolutionary Differentiation between Society and Interaction,” in The Micro-Macro Link, ed. J. Alexander, B. Giesen, N. Smelser and R. Münch (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 112–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990) Essays on Self-Reference (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2002) Theories of Distinction, ed. W. Rasch (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. L. (2009)) Social Structures (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. (1970) “The Social Organization of Relationships,” in Social Relationships, ed. G. McCall, M. McCall, N. Denzin, G. Suttles and S. Kurth (Chicago: Aldine), pp. 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, G. and J. L. Simmons ([1966] 1978) Identities and Interactions (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, P. (1998) “A Frame Analysis of Favor Seeking in the Renaissance: Agency, Networks, and Political Culture,” American Journal of Sociology 104: 51–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. ([1934] 1967) Mind, Self & Society (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A. (2011) “Relational Sociology, Culture, and Agency,” in Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, ed. J. Scott and P. Carrington (Thousands Oaks: Sage), pp. 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. (1994) “Soldiers, Mothers, Tramps and Others: Discourse Roles in the 1907 New York City Charity Directory,” Poetics 22: 327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, C. and D. Snow (2005) “The Study of Personal Relationships in Public Places,” in Together Alone; Personal Relationships in Public Places, ed. C. Morrill, D. Snow and C. White (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachucki, M. and R. Breiger (2010) “Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture,” Annual Review of Sociology 36: 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. ([1961] 1968) “An Outline of the Social System,” in Theories of Society, ed. T. Parsons, E. Shils, K. Naegele and J. Pitts (New York: Free Press), pp. 30–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. ([1968] 1977) “Social Interaction,” in Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory, ed. T. Parsons (New York, Free Press), pp. 154–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., E. Shils, G. Allport, C. Kluckhohn, H. Murray, R. Sears, R. Sheldon, S. Stouffer and E. Tolman ([1951] 1959) “Some Fundamental Categories of the Theory of Action: A General Statement,” in Toward a General Theory of Action, ed. T. Parsons and E. Shils (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press), pp. 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessmann, C. K. (1990) Divorce Talk; Women and Men Make Sense of Personal Relationships (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. and F. Millar (1988) “Relational Communication,” in Handbook of Personal Relationships, ed. S. Duck (Chichester: Wiley), pp. 289–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesch, J. and G. Bateson (1949) “Structure and Process in Social Relations,” Psychiatry 12: 105–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, A. (1989) “Friendship and Trust as Moral Ideals: An Historical Approach,” Archives européennes de sociologie 30: 274–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, A. (1990) “Friendship in Commercial Society: Eighteenth-Century Social Theory and Modern Sociology,” American Journal of Sociology 95: 1474–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D., B. Rochford, S. Worden and R. Benford (1986) “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation,” American Sociological Review 51: 464–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somers, M. (1994) “The Narrative Constitution of Identity: A Relational and Network Approach,” Theory and Society 2: 605–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suttles, G. (1970) “Friendship as a Social Institution,” in Social Relationships, ed. G. McCall, M. McCall, N. Denzin, G. Suttles and S. Kurth (Chicago: Aldine), pp. 95–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (1986) “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies,” American Sociological Review 51: 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. (2001) Talk of Love; How Culture Matters (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1993) “What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations,” in Framing in Discourse, ed. D. Tannen (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 14–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2002) Stories, Identities, and Political Change (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (2005) Identities, Boundaries & Social Ties (Boulder: Paradigm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (2002) Face to Face; Toward a Sociological Theory of Interpersonal Behavior (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1992) Identity and Control; A Structural Theory of Social Action (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1995) “Network Switchings and Bayesian Forks: Reconstructing the Social and Behavioral Sciences,” Social Research 62: 1035–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H., S. Boorman and R. Breiger (1976) “Social Structure from Multiple Networks: Part I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions,” American Journal of Sociology 81: 730–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1966) “Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations in Complex Societies,” in The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, ed. M. Banton (London: Tavistock), pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J. and S. Duck (eds.) (2006) Composing Relationships (Belmont: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, K.T. (2005) “What Does Love Mean? Exploring Network Culture in Two Network Settings,” Social Forces 84: 391–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V. (2005) The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Jan A. Fuhse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

François Dépelteau Christopher Powell

Copyright information

© 2013 François Dépelteau and Christopher Powell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuhse, J.A. (2013). Social Relationships between Communication, Network Structure, and Culture. In: Dépelteau, F., Powell, C. (eds) Applying Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137407009_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation