Skip to main content

Grounded Action and Making Space in Richard II

“How comest thou hither?”

  • Chapter
Shakespeare’s Staged Spaces and Playgoers’ Perceptions

Part of the book series: Palgrave Shakespeare Studies ((PASHST))

  • 93 Accesses

Abstract

In the previous chapter, I concentrated on the repeated use of “eyes” and sight in A Midsummer Night’s Dream as a way of understanding how playgoers are exposed to a variety of notions of how sight functions, both within the frame of the play and for the playgoers themselves. While Richard II is not so obviously dependent on the motif of vision, the visual has important reverberations in the moments when characters are left alone on stage. The noticeable dearth of soliloquies in A Midsummer Night’s Dream is also the case in Richard II. In Richard II, only two characters have soliloquies: Salisbury in 2.4 and Richard in 5.6.1 I think it worthwhile in the first of these to tease out some of the connections to vision in order to pave the way for some of the larger concerns of this chapter.2 Salisbury remains on stage after the departure of a Welsh Captain in the very short 2.4. Salisbury’s soliloquy before departure is a brief seven lines, but effectively connects the truth-telling aspects of a soliloquy to many of the recurrent images in the play. Noticeably, Salisbury draws attention to his vision of Richard through the “eyes of heavy mind” (2.4.18). He even more emphatically notes the metaphoric nature of his vision by providing the linking “like” when he says, “I see thy glory like a shooting star / Fall to the base earth from the firmament” (2.4.19–20).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Later in this chapter, I return to Richard’s 5.6 soliloquy. I draw a firm distinction around soliloquy here and insist on the character being alone on stage; Janette Dillon’s Shakespeare and the Staging of English History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012) argues for a wider use of the term soliloquy, particularly in connection with Richard II, 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a useful exploration of the available different objects called “perspectives” in the period, see Allan Shickman, “The ‘Perspective Glass’ in Shakespeare’s Richard II,” Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 18.2 (1978), 217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeremy Lopez, The Shakespeare Handbooks: Richard II (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charles Forker, (ed.), Richard II, by William Shakespeare (London: Thomson, 2002), 65.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brian Walsh, “The dramaturgy of discomfort,” in Richard II: New Critical Essays, ed. Jeremy Lopez (London: Routledge, 2012), 181–201, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonathan Baldo’s Memory in Shakespeare’s Histories: Stages of Forgetting in Early Modern England (London: Routledge, 2012) reads memory and forgetting in Richard II to offer a modified notion of the kingship the play displays, 10–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E.M.W. Tillyard, Shakespeare’s History Plays (London: Chatto & Windus, 1951), 251.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phyllis Rackin, “The Role of the Audience in Richard II,” Shakespeare Quarterly 36.3 (1985), 262–281, 268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jane Kingsley-Smith, Shakespeare’s Drama of Exile (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003) 56. Kingsley-Smith reads Romeo’s banishment as being essentially about “speechlessness,” which links that banishment to Mowbray’s exile in interesting ways.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Michael Grene, Shakespeare’s Serial History Plays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 170.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jeremy Lopez, “Eating Richard II,” Shakespeare Studies 36 (2008): 207–228, 215.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Darlene Farabee

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farabee, D. (2014). Grounded Action and Making Space in Richard II . In: Shakespeare’s Staged Spaces and Playgoers’ Perceptions. Palgrave Shakespeare Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137427151_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics