Abstract
The innovation, adaption, and use of new technologies on the battlefield have a history which precedes even the written record. How to identify the nature of their impact and regulate their use has been an ongoing challenge for centuries. Contemporary innovation, however, may well represent a shift in traditional paradigms, given that innovation is democratized, that is available to anyone with minimal constraints, and flourishes in unregulated spaces. How to describe emerging technologies and their impact on the battlefield is of considerable importance as humankind wrestles with the legal and ethical decisions required to insure that it is not overtaken by, and perhaps destroyed by, technology’s unintended potential.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
P. W. Singer Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century (New York: Penguin Group, 2009), 1.
Henri Breuil and Raymond Lautier, trans. B.B. Rafter. The Men of the Old Stone Age (Westport, CN: Greenwood Press, 1980), 71.
John Keegan. A History of Warfare (New York: Knopf, 1993), 118.
Max Boot. “Are We the Mongols of the Information Age?” Los Angeles Times, op-ed (October 29, 2006), retrieved at http://www.cfr.org/publicatinsh1837/are_are_we_the_mongols_ofthe_information_age.html, October 10, 2010.
Ibid., 1. See also Max Boot. War Made New: Weapons, Warriors and the Making of the Modern World (New York: Penguin, 2006).
Williamson Murray. “War and the West,” Orbis, Philadelphia, Pa, no. 2 (Spring 2008), 350.
William H. McNeill. The Pursuit of Power, Technologies, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000 (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1982), vii.
Peter Wilson. “Revolutions in Military Affairs as Ways of War, 1914–2014.” Presentation at Strategic Implications of Emerging Technologies Conference, XX Strategy Conference, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle Barracks, Pa (April 2009).
Mike Guetlein. “Lethal Autonomous Weapons-Ethical and Doctrinal Implications,” Naval War College Joint Operations Paper, (February 2005), 6.
Ajey Lele. “Technologies and National Security,” Indian Defence Review, Vol. 24.1 (Jan–Mar, 2009), 6.
Gotz Neuneck and Christian Alwardt. “The Revolution in Military Affairs, Its Driving Forces, Elements and Complexity.” Interdisciplinary Research Group: On Disarmament, Arms Control and Risk Technologies, Working Paper #13 (May 2008).
Jonathan D. Moreno. Mind Wars, Brain Research and National Defense (New York: Dana Press, 2006), 184.
David H. Guston, John Parsi, Justin Tosi. “Anticipating the Ethical and Political Challenges of Human Nanotechnologies,” in Fritz Allhoff, Patrick Lin, James Moor, John Weskert. Nanoethics, the Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2007), 185.
See also, Stephen Hawkings. “Transcendence looks at the implications of artificial intelligence-but are we taking AI seriously enough?” The Independent (May 4, 2014), retrieved at http://www.independent.couk/news/science/stephen-hawking-transcendence-looks-at-theimplications-of-artificial-intelligence, May 4, 2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Richard Michael O’Meara
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Meara, R.M. (2014). Introduction: The Nature of the Problem. In: Governing Military Technologies in the 21st Century: Ethics and Operations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449177_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449177_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-49666-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44917-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)