Abstract
Following the success of the 2008 Obama campaign, both academic study and journalistic inquiry has devoted serious attention to the rise of digital communication within electoral campaigns. Increasingly, the use of analytics and data-driven strategy has been at the center of this interest. For example, the Obama “cave” has been both mythologized and studied deeply. Sasha Issenberg’s Victory Lab bore into the 2008 Obama campaign’s use of data, and updated its account following the 2012 race. The 2012 presidential campaign brought analytics-based get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts on both sides of the aisle. The Republicans’ Orca and Democrats’ Narwhal projects garnered attention both before and after Election Day, with many news outlets attributing their makers’ respective success and failure to the tools themselves, and the larger project of successfully executing a modern, data-driven campaign. But analytics-based campaigning is not as original an invention as these stories of digital pioneers would lead us to believe. Long before the rise of digital strategy, campaigns routinely tested the materials they produced. Employing a variety of methods, from focus groups to surveys to dial tests, campaigns test what issues are salient to voters, poll public opinion on a variety of topics, and test the use of specific language or phrases; all before the “official” message(s) went out, in order to produce the most persuasive ones possible. But with the rise of digital messaging came the availability of analytic data that could capture what citizens did with messages and provide a measurement for success that could be assessed in real time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2015). Using technology, building democracy: Digital campaigning and the construction of citizenship. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731.
Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a Presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Delany, C. (2011). Online politics 101: The tools and tactics of digital political advocacy. Epolitics.com. Retrieved from http://www.epolitics.com/onlinepolitics101.pdf
Delany, C. (2013). How to use the Internet to win in 2014: A comprehensive guide to online politics for campaigns & advocates. Epolitics.com. Retrieved from http://www.epolitics.com/winningin2014/
Engage. (2013). Inside the cave: An in-depth look at the digital, technology, and analytics operations of Obama for America. Retrieved from http://engagedc.com/dowwnload/Inside%20the%20Cave.pdf
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2000). The effect of a nonpartisan get-out-the-vote drive: An experimental study of leafletting. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 846–857.
Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2001). Do phone calls increase voter turnout?: A field experiment. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(1), 75–85.
Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boxzkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P. J., & Foot, K. (Eds.). (2014). Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Green, D. P., & Gerber, A. S. (2001). Getting out the youth vote: Results from randomized field experiments. Unpublished report to the Pew Charitable Trusts, Institution for Social and Policy Studies.
Harfoush, R. (2009). Yes we did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand. New York, NY: New Riders Press.
Hendricks, J. A., & Denton, R. E. (Eds.). (2010). Communicator-in-chief: How Barack Obama used new media technology to win the White House. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Hendricks, J. A., & Kaid, L. L. (Eds.). (2011). Techno politics in presidential campaigning: New voices, new technologies, and new voters. New York, NY: Routledge.
Howard, A. (2014). Why data-driven campaigning matters in the 2014 elections and beyond. TechRepublic. Retrieved from http://www.techrepublic.com/article/why-data-driven-campaigning-matters-in-the-2014-us-elections-and-beyond/
Howard, P. (2006). New media and the managed citizen. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Issenberg, S. (2012). The victory lab: The secret science of winning campaigns. New York, NY: Crown Books.
Katz, J., Barris, M., Jain, A. (2013). The social media president: Barack Obama and the politics of digital engagement. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Karpf, D. (2012). The Move on effect. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Karpf, D., Kreiss, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2014). A New Era of Field Research in Political Communication? In L. Lievrouw (Ed.), Challenging Communication Research (pp. 43–57). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Kreiss, D. (2012). Taking our country back: The crafting of networked politics from Howard Dean to Barack Obama. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Madrigal, A. (2012, November 16). When the nerds go marching in. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/11/when-the-nerds-go-marching-in/265325/
McKenna, E., & Han, H. (2014). Groundbreakers: How Obama’s 2.2 million volunteers transformed campaigning in America. New York. NY: Oxford University Press.
Mintz, D. (2011, February 25). Optimized: Building the NOI analytics training. New Organizing Institute. Retrieved from http://neworganizing.com/content/blog/optimized-building-the-noi-analytics-training
Nielsen, R. K. (2012). Ground wars: Personalized communication in political campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Norris, P. (2007). A virtuous circle: The impact of political communications in post-industrial democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Progressive Exchange Listserve (2012, August 21–23). Tools check in [Electronic mailing list message].
Rackaway, C. (2007). Trickle-down technology? The use of computing and network technology in legislative campaigns. Social Science Computer Review, 25(4), 466–483.
Rougier, C. (2014, Devember 29). Why big data projects often fail. Campaigns & Elections. Retreived from http://www.campaignsandelections.com/campaign-insider/2376/why-big-data-projects-often-fail
Sides, J., Vavreck, L. (2014, January 21) Obama’s not-so-big data. Pacific Standard. Retrieved from http://www.psmag.com/books-and-culture/obamas-big-data-inconclusive-results-political-campaigns-72687
Scherer, M. (2012, November 2). Inside the secret world of the data crunchers who helped Obama win. Time Magazine. Retrieved from http://swampland.time.com/2012/11/07/inside-the-secret-world-of-quants-and-data-crunchers-who-helped-obama-win/
UptakeVideo. (2011, August 7). Regina Schwartz of Analyst Institute at Netroots Nation 2011. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwLDDRSCl04
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2016 Jessica Baldwin-Philippi
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2016). The Cult(ure) of Analytics in 2014. In: Hendricks, J.A., Schill, D. (eds) Communication and Midterm Elections. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137488015_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137488015_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-55663-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48801-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)