Skip to main content

England’s Foundation Stage Child in a Shifting World: Troubling Grids of Reasoning of “Children with Potential,” “Normalization,” and “Value-Added” Curriculum

  • Chapter
Global Perspectives on Human Capital in Early Childhood Education

Part of the book series: Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood ((CCSC))

  • 291 Accesses

Abstract

In many countries national dialogues about education for “early childhood” or “early years” children have become a priority. These dialogues ask important questions about the quality of curriculum, the preparation of practitioners, the types and levels of funding, the value of education for younger children, and the prioritization of programs for all young children or solely for children “at risk.” Advocates for young children have long urged that all of these questions be considered and many nations have recently implemented policies that vary widely in their national responses to these questions and commitment to early childhood learning. England has chosen intriguing solutions to these questions and this chapter will analyze and critique a few of these ideas while looking at points of rupture in discourses about young children as citizens and proto-citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baker, B. (2001). In perpetual motion: Theories of power, educational history, and the child. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W., & Schweinhart, L. (1996). Lives in the balance: Age-27 benefit-cost analysis of the High/Scope Perry Preschool Program. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1964, 1993 3rd ed.). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1987). Becoming scientific and professional: Historical perspectives on the aims of early education and child care. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), The formation of school subjects: The struggle for an American institution. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (2003). Global/local analyses of the construction of “family-child welfare.” In M. Bloch, K. Holmlund, I. Moqvist, & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Governing children, families & education: Restructuring the welfare state (pp. 195–230). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M., & Popkewitz, T. (2000). Constructing the parent, teacher and child: Discourses on development. In L. D. Soto (Ed.), The Politics of Early Childhood Education (pp. 7–33). Peter Lang Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1980). Under five in Britain. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (2008). Developments: Child, image, nation. East Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canella, G. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice & revolution. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1986, 1988). Foucault. S. Hand (Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early years foundation stage framework. Retrieved on April 15, 2013, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/early-years-foundation-stage-framework

  • Education Act 2002. (2002). Chapter 32. London: The Parliamentary Bookshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, M. Foucault, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 87–105). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow, J. (2005). Market childcare: Preliminary observations of the “property view” of the child. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 54–65. Symposium Journals. Retrieved on July 15, 2011, from http://cie.sagepub.com/content/6/1/54.full.pdf+html

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1990). The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J. (2002). Accountability shovedown: Resisting the standards movement in early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 457–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallory, B., & New, R. (1994). Diversity and developmentally appropriate practices: Challenges for early childhood education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2007, June). Meetings across the paradigmatic divide. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(3), 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2008a, January 24). Beyond childcare, markets and technical practice—repoliticising early childhood. In Proceedings of CSER Early Childhood Care and Education Seminar Series 2 (pp. 5–14). Centre for Social and Educational Research, Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (2008b, August). Toward a new public education: Making globalization work for us all. Child Development Perspectives. Child Development Perspectives, 2(2), 114–119. Retrieved from DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00051.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Penn, H. (Eds.). (1996). Transforming nursery education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2000). Country note: Early childhood education and care policy in the United Kingdom. Retrieved on February 23, 2002, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/32/2535034.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2006). Starting Strong II: Early childhood education and care. Retrieved on May 26, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/15/37423795.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell, C. (2005). Michel Foucault (Core cultural theorists series). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). (2000). Curriculum guidance for the foundation stage. London: QCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • QCA. (2001). Planning for learning in the foundation stage. London: QCA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed.). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkoff, J., & Phillips, D. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1998). Daddy’s girl: Young girls and popular culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Theodora Lightfoot-Rueda Ruth Lynn Peach

Copyright information

© 2015 Theodora Lightfoot-Rueda and Ruth Lynn Peach

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peach, R.L. (2015). England’s Foundation Stage Child in a Shifting World: Troubling Grids of Reasoning of “Children with Potential,” “Normalization,” and “Value-Added” Curriculum. In: Lightfoot-Rueda, T., Peach, R.L. (eds) Global Perspectives on Human Capital in Early Childhood Education. Critical Cultural Studies of Childhood. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137490865_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics