Skip to main content

Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations: a Survey

  • Chapter
Democratizing Global Governance
  • 97 Accesses

Abstract

The post-Cold War period has witnessed a proliferation of ‘multilateral peace operations’ — a term that is used here to refer to two crucial notions which have been in wide circulation for decades: peacekeeping and peace enforcement. The former is usually thought to involve deployment and non-coercive activities of multinational personnel authorized by IGOs with the specific purpose of handling violent conflict. The latter can be said to cover coercive multilateral operations ranging from limited-scope sanctions to full-scale collective security action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 47.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. B. Boutros-Ghali, An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peacekeepin (New York: UN, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See S.R. Ratner, The New Peacekeeping: Building Peace in Lands of Conflict After the Cold Wa (New York: St. Martin’s Press [now Palgrave Macmillan], 1995), pp.42–3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boutros-Ghali (1992), para.26; Commission on Global Governance, p.98; Canada, pp.43–4; Carnegie Commission, pp.44–8; B. Boutros-Ghali, Supplement to An Agenda for Peace: Position Paper of the Secretary-General on the Occasion of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nation (New York: United Nations, 1995), para.56; Oxfam International, Improving the Us Response to Complex Emergencie (Position Paper, November 1997), p.10; K.A. Annan, Renewing the United Nations: a Programme for Refor (New York: United Nations, 1997), paras 65, 111; Independent Working Group on the Future of the United Nations, The United Nations in its Second Half-Centur (New York: Ford Foundation, 1995), available online at: <http://www.library.yale.edu//un/unhome.htm> (10 March 1999), paras 11–13 under Part 3a.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boutros-Ghali (1992), para.25; Canada, p.51; Commission on Global Governance, p.99; Annan, para.110; Brahimi Repor, para.32; G. Evans, Cooperating for Peace: the Global Agenda for the 1990s and Beyon (NSW: Allen & Unwin, 1993), pp.178, 181.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Commission on Global Governance, pp.94–7; Carnegie Commission, chs.3–4; Brahimi Repor, para.29; the South Centre, For A Strong and Democratic United Nations: a South Perspective on UN Refor (Geneva: the South Centre, 1996), p.20.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boutros-Ghali (1995), paras 66–76; Evans, pp.138–40; Commission on Global Governance, p.108; Carnegie Commission, pp.54–6, 139; Annan, para.108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Childers and B. Urquhart, Renewing the United Nations Syste (Uppsala, Sweden: Dag Hammarskjold Foundation, 1994), pp.204–5, 209; Canada, pp.52, 59; Boutros-Ghali (1992), paras 43–4, 51; Boutros-Ghali (1995), paras 30–1; Oxfam, pp.12–13; Brahimi Repor, paras 118–26, 135–45; 219–25; UNA-USA, pp.17–18, 25–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, p.125; Boutros-Ghali (1995), para.44; Canada, p.48. For differing versions of the idea of a rapid-reaction force, see Independent Working Group, paras 24–9 under 3a; Commission on Global Governance, pp.110–12; Carnegie Commission, pp.66–7; Oxfam, pp.12–13; Annan, para.113; Brahimi Repor, paras 84–91, 110–17; and the Military Working Group on a Multinational United Nations Stand-by Forces High Readiness Brigade, Non-Pape (A/51/75-S/1996/166, 5 March 1996). For sceptical views on a ‘standing’ rapid-reaction force, see Evans, pp.163–5; UNA-USA, pp.23–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boutros-Ghali (1995), paras 38, 41; Evans, pp.148–49, 160–61; Carnegie Commission, p.66; UNA-USA, pp.29–31; Commission on Global Governance, pp.102, 109; Canada, p.52; Annan, para.119.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boutros-Ghali (1992), para.52; Evans, pp.120–4, 170–4; Canada, p.46; Independent Working Group, paras 11–13 under Part 3a; Annan, paras 117–18; Brahimi Repor, paras 68–75, Part IV.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boutros-Ghali (1992), paras 64–5; Commission on Global Governance, pp.104–5; Carnegie Commission, pp.146–9; Oxfam, pp.13–14. With regard to possible mode of co-ordination between the UN and regional organizations, see Boutros-Ghali (1995), paras 86–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Commission on Global Governance, pp.112–13; Boutros-Ghali (1992), paras 47–8, 69–74; Oxfam, p.16; Evans, pp.117–120; the South Centre, pp.77, 97–8; Canada, p.42; Annan, para.114; Brahimi Repor, paras 172–8, 195–6; UNA-USA, pp.33–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W.J. Durch (ed.), The Evolution of UN Peacekeeping: Case Studies and Comparative Analysi (London: Macmillan, 1994), p.12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2002 Eşref Aksu

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aksu, E. (2002). Reforming Multilateral Peace Operations: a Survey. In: Aksu, E., Camilleri, J.A. (eds) Democratizing Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403907110_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics