Skip to main content

Inside Global Governance: New Borders of a Concept

  • Chapter
Criticizing Global Governance

Abstract

Concepts matter in the way we conceive of our world. Global governance is no exception. What is more, concepts fundamentally shape our social reality and constitute the boundaries of what is possible and what is not. Global governance—as such a concept—opens up our social reality to new opportunities and choices while simultaneously excluding previously available options. This chapter engages with the political implications of “talking global governance.” Instead of looking for an appropriate definition that is presumably able to correspond to real-world features and to reflect the nature of global governance “as it is,” this chapter engages with the conceptual basis of global governance and shows what this means in political terms. As a possible answer to the question of political order, it is argued, global governance provides a concurrent model to state sovereignty as the basic principle of political organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Annan, Kofi A. 2000. “We, the Peoples.” The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century. New York: UN Department of Public Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, U., A. Brunnengräber, L. Schrader, C. Stock, and P. Wahl. 2000. Global Governance. Alternative zur neoliberalen Globalisierung? Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Global Governance. 1995. Our Global Neighborhood. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, William. 1983. The Terms of Political Discourse. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Robert. 1999. Can International Organizations be Democratic? A Skeptic’s View. In Democracy’s Edges; edited by I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordón. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, Meghnad. 1995. Global Governance. In Global Governance. Ethics and Economics of the World Order, edited by M. Desai and P. Redfern. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, Lawrence S. 1995. What Is Global Governance? Global Governance 1:367–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B. 1962. Essentially Contested Concepts. In The Importance of Language, edited by M. Black. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom, A. J. R., and Dominic Powell. 1994. From World Politics to Global Governance: A Theme in Need of a Focus. In Contemporary International Relations, edited by A. J. R. Groom and M. Light. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzini, Stefano. 1993. Structural Power: The Limits of Neorealist Power Analysis. International Organization 47 (3): 443–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. “Power” in International Relations: Concept Formation between Conceptual Analysis and Conceptual History. Edited by C. P. R. Institute. Working Paper No.7. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Peace Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, Ted. 2002. Making the Future Inevitable: Legitimizing, Naturalizing and Stabilizing. The Transition in Estonia, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. European Journal of International Relations 8 (3): 403–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph Nye. 2000. Introduction. In Governance in a Globalizing World, edited by J. Nye and J. Donahue. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • König-Archibugi, Mathias. 2002. Mapping Global Governance. In Governing Globalization. Power, Authority and Global Governance, edited by D. Held and A. McGrew. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty as Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry in the Formation of the State System. World Politics 39: 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Vergeßt Kant! Reflexionen zur Debatte über Ethik und internationale Politik. In Politische Philosophie der Internationalen Beziehungen, edited by C. Chwaszcza and W. Kersting. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2001. Sovereignty: Myth, Organized Hypocrisy, or Generative Grammar? The Case for a Conceptual Approach. LMU, Munich (xerox).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John G. Ruggie. 1986. The State of the Art on the Art of the State. International Organization 40 (4): 753–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, Robert. 1999. Politics in a Floating World: Toward a Critique of Global Governance. In Approaches to Global Governance Theory, edited by M. Hewson and T. J. Sinclair. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmae, K. 1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Onara. 1998. Justice and Boundaries. In Politische Philosophie der Internationalen Beziehungen, edited by C. Chwaszcza and W. Kersting. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, Ronen. 1999. Global Governance and Social Closure or Who is to Be Governed in the Era of Global Governance? In Approaches to Global Governance Theory, edited by M. Hewson and T. J. Sinclair. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 1995. Sovereignty: An Introduction and Brief History. Journal of International Affairs 48 (2): 353–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1999. Westphalia, Authority, and International Society. In Sovereignty at the Millenium, edited by R. H. Jackson. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992. Governance, Order, and Change in World Politics. In Governance without government. Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. N. Rosenau and E.-O. Czempiel, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. 2002. Governance in a New Global Order. In Governing Globalization. Power, Authority and Global Governance, edited by D. Held and A. McGrew. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, John G. 1998. Constructing the World Polity. Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, George. 1999. Sovereignty: Change and Continuity in a Fundamental Institution. In Sovereignty at the Millenium, edited by R. H. Jackson. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1983. Cave! hic dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis. In International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suganami, Hidemi. 1989. The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thaa, Winfried. 2001. “Lean Citizenship.” The Fading Away of the Political in Transnational Democracy. European Journal of International Relations 7 (4): 503–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Väyrynen, Raimo, ed. 1999. Globalization and Global Governance. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waever, Ole. 1997. Concepts of Security. Copenhagen: Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. Unitness under Post-Sovereignty: Why Inside/Outside Outlives Territorial Exclusivity in an International Relations Perspective. Paper for a workshop on Identities, Borders, Orders: New Directions in IR Theory, Aschaffenburg, Germany, January 10–12, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000. Both Globalization and Sovereignty: Re-Imagining the Political. In Principled World Politics, edited by P. Wapner and L. E. J. Ruiz. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, Wouter W., and Jaap H. de Wilde. 2001. The Endurance of Sovereignty. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 283–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, Ngaire. 2002. Mapping Global Governance. In Governing Globalization. Power, Authority and Global Governance, edited by D. Held and A. McGrew. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, Mark W. 1992. The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance. In Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, edited by J. N. Rosenau and E.-O. Czempiel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Markus Lederer and Philipp S. Müller

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Späth, K. (2005). Inside Global Governance: New Borders of a Concept. In: Lederer, M., Müller, P.S. (eds) Criticizing Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403979513_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics