Skip to main content

Characterizing Two Decades of Rare Plant Reintroductions

  • Chapter
Plant Reintroduction in a Changing Climate

Part of the book series: The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration ((SPER))

Abstract

There is enormous potential conservation value in the ability to establish new populations of rare plants. When combined with ex situ source material, reintroduction offers valuable and otherwise unavailable conservation options. Indeed, reintroduction of material stored ex situ has made the difference between extinction in the wild and continued survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Falk, D. A., C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell. 1996. Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, T. 2008. Vital steps toward success of endangered plant reintroductions. Native Plants 9:313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B. M. 1996. Defining and measuring success. In Restoring Diversity, Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 127–55. Covelo, CA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant, E. O. Jr. 1996a. Designing populations: Demographic, genetic, and horticultural dimensions. In Restoring Diversity: Ecological Restoration and Endangered Plants, edited by D. Falk, C. Millar, and P. Olwell, 171–207. New York: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Plant Conservation. 2009. CPC International Reintroduction Registry. Accessed September 1, 2009, http://www.centerforplantconservation.org/reintroduction/MN_ReintroductionEntrance.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cully, A. 1996. Knowlton’s cactus (Pediocactus knowltonii) reintroduction. In Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 403–10. Covelo, CA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivinski, R. 2008. Knowlton’s cactus (Pediocactus knowltonii). Santa Fe: New Mexico Forestry Division.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik, B. M. 1996. Defining and measuring success. In Restoring Diversity, Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 127–55. Covelo, CA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, S. 1988. Malheur wirelettuce (Stephanomeria malheurensis) Biology and Interactions with Cheatgrass: 1987 Study Results and Recommendations for a Recovery Plan. Burns District, OR: Bureau of Land Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant, E. O. Jr. 1996b. Reintroduction of Stephanomeria malheurensis, a case study. In Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Species, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 399–402. Covelo, CA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski, J., and J. Duquesnel. 2007. Successful reintroductions of the endangered long-lived Sargent’s cherry palm, Pseudophoenix sargentii, in the Florida Keys. Biological Conservation 134:122–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, B. A., and T. N. Kaye. 2009. Reintroduction of Castilleja levisecta: Effects of ecological similarity, source population genetics, and habitat quality. Restoration Ecology. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2009.00549.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant, E. O. Jr., and T. N. Kaye. 2007. Reintroduction of rare and endangered plants: Common factors, questions, and common approaches. Australian Journal of Botany 55:362–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaux, R. H., E. A. Friar, and D. W. Mount. 1997. Molecular genetic consequences of a population bottleneck associated with reintroduction of the Mauna Kea silver- sword (Argyroxiphium sandwicense ssp. sandwicense [Asteraceae]). Conservation Biology 11:1140–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brumback, W. E., and C. W. Fyler. 1996. Small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) transplant project. In Restoring Diversity: Strategies for Reintroduction of Endangered Plants, edited by D. A. Falk, C. I. Millar, and M. Olwell, 433–43. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallee, L., T. Hogbin, L. Monks, B. Makinson, M. Matthes, and M. Rossetto. 2004. Guidelines for the Translocation of Threatened Plants in Australia, 2nd ed. Australian Network for Plant Conservation, Canberra. Accessed November 1, 2010, http://www.anbg.gov.au/anpc/books.html#Translocation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottin, L., S. Le Cadre, A. Quilichini, P. Bardin, J. Moret, and N. Machon. 2007. Reestablishment trials in endangered plants: A review and the example of Arenaria grandiflora, a species on the brink of extinction in the Parisian region (France). Ecoscience 14:410–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braham, R., C. Murray, and M. Boyer. 2006. Mitigating impacts to Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii Sarg.): A case study of transplanting an endangered shrub. Castanea 71(4):265–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groff, P. A., and D. R. Kaplan. 1988. The relation of root systems to shoot systems in vascular plants. The Botanical Review 54:387–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menges, E. S., and P. F. Quintana-Ascencio. 2004. Population viability with fire in Eryngium cuneifolium: Deciphering a decade of demographic data. Ecological Monographs 74:79–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Possley, J., K. Hines, J. Maschinski, J. G. Dozier, and C. Rodriguez. 2007. Multiple agencies and volunteers unite to reintroduce goatsfoot passionflower to rockland hammocks of Miami, Florida. Native Plants Journal 8:252–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kephart, S. R. 2004. Inbreeding and reintroduction: Progeny success in rare Silene populations of varied density. Conservation Genetics 5:49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendelberger, K. S., M. Q. N. Fellows, and J. Maschinski. 2008. Rescue and restoration: Experimental translocation of Amorpha herbacea Walter var. crenulata (Rybd.) Isley into a novel urban habitat. Restoration Ecology 16:542–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, M. A., and K. A. McCue. 2010. Changes in demographic processes over long time scales reveal the challenge of restoring an endangered plant. Restoration Ecology 18:235–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. A., E. E. Knapp, and E. O. Guerrant. 2001. An Introduction to Restoration Genetics. Plant Conservation Alliance, Bureau of Land Management, US Department of Interior, US Environmental Protection Authority. http://www.ser.org/pdf/SER -restoration-genetics.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipoly, J. I., J. Maschinski, J. B. Pascarella, S. J. Wright, and J. Fisher. 2006. Demography of Coastal Dunes Vines: Endangered Jacquemontia reclinata, Endangered Okenia hypogaea, and Threatened Cyperus pedunculatus, from South Florida. Final report to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, R., and E. O. Guerrant Jr. 1990. Down but not out: Reintroduction of the extirpated Malheur wirelettuce, Stephanomeria malheurensis. Endangered Species Update 8:62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currin, R., R. J. Meinke, and A. Raven. 2007. Malheur Wirelettuce (Stephanomeria malheurensis) Recovery Efforts: Reintroduction and Seed Bulking. Prepared by Oregon Department of Agriculture and Berry Botanic Garden for US Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currin, R., and R. J. Meinke. 2008. Malheur Wirelettuce (Stephanomeria malheurensis) Reintroduction and Seed Bulking: 2008 Recovery Efforts. Report prepared for US Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1, Portland, Oregon. Salem: Oregon Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauner, S. 1988. Malheur wirelettuce (Stephanomeria malheurensis) Biology and Interactions with Cheatgrass: 1987 Study Results and Recommendations for a Recovery Plan. Burns District, OR: Bureau of Land Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A. 2002. Radical Ecopsychology: Psychology in the Service of Life. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschinski, J., J. Goodman, S. J. Wright, D. Walters, J. Possley, and C. Lewis. 2009. The Connect to Protect Network: Botanic gardens working to restore habitats and conserve rare species. BGJournal 6:6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrant, E. O. Jr., K. Havens, and M. Maunder, eds. 2004b. Ex Situ Plant Conservation: Supporting Species Survival in the Wild. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, C. G., B. Ruhfel, R. B. Primack, A. J. Miller-Rushing, and C. C. Davis. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau’s woods are driven by climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:17029–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J., D. D. Keck, and W. M. Hiesey. 1940. Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. I. The Effect of Varied Environments on Western North American Plants. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. A. 1990. Integrated strategies for conserving plant genetic diversity. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 77:38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Island Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerrant, E.O. (2012). Characterizing Two Decades of Rare Plant Reintroductions. In: Maschinski, J., Haskins, K.E., Raven, P.H. (eds) Plant Reintroduction in a Changing Climate. The Science and Practice of Ecological Restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-183-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics