Abstract
“Gating” refers to the selection of successive subpopulations of cells for analysis in flow cytometry. It is usually performed manually, based on expert knowledge of cell characteristics. However, there can be considerable disagreement in how gates should be applied, even between individuals experienced in the field. While clinical software often automates gating, and some guidelines do exist (especially for clinical assays), there are no comprehensive guidelines across the various types of immunological assays performed using flow cytometry. Here we attempt to provide such guidelines, focused on the most general and pervasive types of gates, why they are important, and what recommendations can be made regarding their use. We do so through the display of example data, collected by academic, government, and industry representatives. These guidelines should be of value to both novice and experienced flow cytometrists analyzing a wide variety of immunological assays.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burel JG, Qian Y, Lindestam Arlehamn C et al (2017) An integrated workflow to assess technical and biological variability of cell population frequencies in human peripheral blood by flow cytometry. J Immunol 198:1748–1758
Disis ML, dela Rosa C, Goodell V et al (2006) Maximizing the retention of antigen specific lymphocyte function after cryopreservation. J Immunol Methods 308:13–18
Posevitz-Fejfár A, Posevitz V, Gross CC et al (2014) Effects of blood transportation on human peripheral mononuclear cell yield, phenotype and function: implications for immune cell biobanking. PLoS One 9:e115920
Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Lamoreaux L et al (2006) Amine reactive dyes: an effective tool to discriminate live and dead cells in polychromatic flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 313:199–208
Shankey TV, Rabinovitch PS, Bagwell B et al (1993) Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry. International Society for Analytical Cytology. Cytometry 14:472–477
Perfetto SP, Roederer M (2007) Increased immunofluorescence sensitivity using 532 nm laser excitation. Cytometry A 71:73–79
Maecker HT, Trotter J (2006) Flow cytometry controls, instrument setup, and the determination of positivity. Cytometry A 69:1037–1042
Watson JV (1987) Time, a quality-control parameter in flow cytometry. Cytometry 8:646–649
Fletez-Brant K, Špidlen J, Brinkman RR et al (2016) flowClean: automated identification and removal of fluorescence anomalies in flow cytometry data. Cytometry A 89:461–471
Maecker HT, McCoy JP, Nussenblatt R (2012) Standardizing immunophenotyping for the Human Immunology Project. Nat Rev Immunol 12:191–200
Lamoreaux L, Roederer M, Koup R (2006) Intracellular cytokine optimization and standard operating procedure. Nat Protoc 1:1507–1516
Maecker HT, Frey T, Nomura LE et al (2004) Selecting fluorochrome conjugates for maximum sensitivity. Cytometry A 62:169–173
Roederer M (2001) Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats. Cytometry A 45:194–205
Chevrier S, Crowell HL, Zanotelli VRT et al (2018) Compensation of signal spillover in suspension and imaging mass cytometry. Cell Syst 6:612–620.e5
Finak G, Perez J-M, Weng A et al (2010) Optimizing transformations for automated, high throughput analysis of flow cytometry data. BMC Bioinformatics 11:546
Novo D, Wood J (2008) Flow cytometry histograms: transformations, resolution, and display. Cytometry A 73:685–692
(1992) Guidelines for the performance of CD4+ T-cell determinations in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. MMWR Recomm Rep 41:1–17
(1994) 1994 revised guidelines for the performance of CD4+ T-cell determinations in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 43:1–21
(1997) 1997 revised guidelines for performing CD4+ T-cell determinations in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 46:1–29
Mandy FF, Nicholson JKA, McDougal JS et al (2003) Guidelines for performing single-platform absolute CD4+ T-cell determinations with CD45 gating for persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recomm Rep 52:1–13
O.W. Health (2007) Laboratory guidelines for enumerating CD4 T lymphocytes in the context of HIV/AIDS. World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi
Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M et al (1996) The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother 5:213–226
Illingworth A, Marinov I, Sutherland DR et al (2018) ICCS/ESCCA consensus guidelines to detect GPI-deficient cells in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) and related disorders part 3—data analysis, reporting and case studies. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 94:49–66
McNeil LK, Price L, Britten CM et al (2013) A harmonized approach to intracellular cytokine staining gating: results from an international multiconsortia proficiency panel conducted by the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium (CIC/CRI). Cytometry A 83:728–738
Britten CM, Janetzki S, Ben-Porat L et al (2009) Harmonization guidelines for HLA-peptide multimer assays derived from results of a large scale international proficiency panel of the Cancer Vaccine Consortium. Cancer Immunol Immunother 58:1701–1713
Nomura L, Maino VC, Maecker HT (2008) Standardization and optimization of multiparameter intracellular cytokine staining. Cytometry A 73:984–991
Finak G, Langweiler M, Jaimes M et al (2016) Standardizing flow cytometry immunophenotyping analysis from the human immunophenotyping consortium. Sci Rep 6:20686
Verschoor CP, Lelic A, Bramson JL et al (2015) An introduction to automated flow cytometry gating tools and their implementation. Front Immunol 6:380
Mair F, Hartmann FJ, Mrdjen D et al (2016) The end of gating? An introduction to automated analysis of high dimensional cytometry data. Eur J Immunol 46:34–43
Martin JC, Swartzendruber DE (1980) Time: a new parameter for kinetic measurements in flow cytometry. Science 207:199–201
Hoffman RA (2009) Pulse width for particle sizing. Curr Protoc Cytom Chapter 1:Unit 1.23
Wersto RP, Chrest FJ, Leary JF et al (2001) Doublet discrimination in DNA cell-cycle analysis. Cytometry 46:296–306
Furman MI, Barnard MR, Krueger LA et al (2001) Circulating monocyte-platelet aggregates are an early marker of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 38:1002–1006
Nomura LE, Walker JM, Maecker HT (2000) Optimization of whole blood antigen-specific cytokine assays for CD4(+) T cells. Cytometry 40:60–68
Parks DR, Roederer M, Moore WA (2006) A new “Logicle” display method avoids deceptive effects of logarithmic scaling for low signals and compensated data. Cytometry A 69:541–551
Bagwell CB, Hill BL, Herbert DJ et al (2016) Sometimes simpler is better: VLog, a general but easy-to-implement log-like transform for cytometry. Cytometry A 89:1097–1105
Andersen MN, Al-Karradi SNH, Kragstrup TW et al (2016) Elimination of erroneous results in flow cytometry caused by antibody binding to Fc receptors on human monocytes and macrophages. Cytometry A 89:1001–1009
Richards AJ, Staats J, Enzor J et al (2014) Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 409:54–61
Hultin LE, Chow M, Jamieson BD et al (2010) Comparison of interlaboratory variation in absolute T-cell counts by single-platform and optimized dual-platform methods. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 78:194–200
Vogt RF, Cross GD, Henderson LO et al (1989) Model system evaluating fluorescein-labeled microbeads as internal standards to calibrate fluorescence intensity on flow cytometers. Cytometry 10:294–302
Maecker HT, Rinfret A, D’Souza P et al (2005) Standardization of cytokine flow cytometry assays. BMC Immunol 6:13
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the EQAPOL consortium and Jennifer Enzor for providing data and analysis examples, and the FOCIS Immunophenotyping Course participants for helpful suggestions and vetting of these guidelines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Staats, J., Divekar, A., McCoy, J.P., Maecker, H.T. (2019). Guidelines for Gating Flow Cytometry Data for Immunological Assays. In: McCoy, Jr, J. (eds) Immunophenotyping. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2032. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9650-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9650-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-9649-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-9650-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols