Skip to main content

Competitive Auction

2001; Goldberg, Hartline, Wright 2002; Fiat, Goldberg, Hartline, Karlin

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Algorithms
  • 156 Accesses

Problem Definition

This problem studies the one round, sealed-bid auction model where an auctioneer would like to sell an idiosyncratic commodity with unlimited copies to n bidders and each bidder \( { i \in \{1, \dots,n\} } \) will get at most one item. 

First, for any i, bidder i bids a value b i representing the price he is willing to pay for the item. They submit the bids simultaneously. After receiving the bidding vector \( { \mathbf{b}=(b_1, \dots, b_n) } \), the auctioneer computes and outputs the allocation vector \( { \mathbf{x}=(x_1, \dots, x_n) \in \{0,1\}^n } \) and the price vector \( { \mathbf{p}=(p_1, \dots, p_n) } \). If for any i, \( { x_i=1 } \), then bidder i gets the item and pays p i for it. Otherwise, bidder i loses and pays nothing. In the auction, the auctioneer's revenue is \( { \sum_{i=1}^n \mathbf{x}\mathbf{p}^\mathrm{T} } \).

Definition 1 (Optimal Single Price Omniscient Auction \( { \mathcal{F} } \))

Given a bidding vector \( { \mathbf{b} } \)sorted in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 399.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Abrams, Z.: Revenue maximization when bidders have budgets. In: Proceedings of the seventeenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA-06), Miami, FL, 22–26 January 2006, pp. 1074–1082. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Yossef, Z., Hildrum, K., Wu, F.: Incentive-compatible online auctions for digital goods. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium On Discrete Mathematics (SODA-02), New York, 6–8 January 2002, pp. 964–970. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Borgs, C., Chayes, J.T., Immorlica, N., Mahdian, M., Saberi, A.: Multi-unit auctions with budget-constrained bidders. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-05), 2005, pp. 44–51

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bu, T.-M., Qi, Q., Sun, A.W.: Unconditional competitive auctions with copy and budget constraints. In: Spirakis, P.G., Mavronicolas, M., Kontogiannis, S.C. (eds.) Internet and Network Economics, 2nd International Workshop, WINE 2006, Patras, Greece, 15–17 Dec 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4286, pp. 16–26. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deshmukh, K., Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R.: Truthful and competitive double auctions. In: Möhring, R.H., Raman, R. (eds.) Algorithms–ESA 2002, 10th Annual European Symposium, Rome, Italy, 17–21 Sept 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2461, pp. 361–373. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fiat, A., Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Karlin, A.R.: Competitive generalized auctions. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC-02), New York, 19–21 May 2002, pp. 72–81. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D.: Competitive auctions for multiple digital goods. In: auf der Heide, F.M. (ed.) Algorithms – ESA 2001, 9th Annual European Symposium, Aarhus, Denmark, 28–31 Aug 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2161, pp. 416–427. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg, A.V. Hartline, J.D.: Envy-free auctions for digital goods. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-03), New York, 9–12 June 2003, pp. 29–35. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldberg, A.V., Hartline, J.D., Wright, A.: Competitive auctions and digital goods. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA-01), New York, 7–9 January 2001, pp. 735–744. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Moulin, H.: Incremental cost sharing: Characterization by coalition strategy-proofness. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 279–320 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nisan, N.and Ronen, A.: Algorithmic mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC-99), New York, May 1999, pp. 129–140. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Parkes, D.C.: Chapter 2: Iterative Combinatorial Auctions. Ph. D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bu, TM. (2008). Competitive Auction. In: Kao, MY. (eds) Encyclopedia of Algorithms. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30162-4_78

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics