Skip to main content

Uncertain Environmental Variables in GIS

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of GIS

Synonyms

Spatial data quality; Attribute and positional error in GIS; Spatial accuracy assessment; Accuracy; Error; Probability theory; Object-oriented; Taylor series; Monte carlo simulation

Definition

Environmental variables are inherently uncertain. For example, instruments cannot measure with perfect accuracy, samples are not exhaustive, variables change over time (in partially unpredictable ways), and abstractions and simplifications of the real world are necessary when resources are limited. While these imperfections are frequently ignored in GIS analyses, the importance of developing ‘uncertainty aware’ GIS has received increasing attention in recent years. Assessing and communicating uncertainty is important for establishing the value of data as an input to decision‐making, for judging the credibility of decisions that are informed by data and for directing resources towards improving data quality. In this context, uncertainties in data propagate through GIS analyses...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Recommended Reading

  1. Arbia, G., Griffith, D.A., Haining, R.P.: Spatial error propagation when computing linear combinations of spectral bands: the case of vegetation indices. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 10, 375–396 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, J.D., Heuvelink, G.B.M.: The Data Uncertainty Engine (DUE): a software tool for assessing and simulating uncertain environmental variables. Comput. & Geosci. 33, 172–190 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crosetto, M., Tarantola, S.: Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis: tools for GIS-based model implementation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15, 415–437 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ehlschlaeger, C.R., Shortridge, A.M., Goodchild, M.F.: Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation. Comput. & Geosci. 23, 387–395 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher, P.: Editorial, Citations to the International Journal of Geographical Information Systems and Science: the first 10 years. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 15, 1–6 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, P.E., Tate, N.J.: Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30, 467–489 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Foody, G.M., Atkinson, P.M. (eds.): Uncertainty in Remote Sensing and GIS. Wiley, Chicester (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodchild, M.F., Guoqing, S., Shiren, Y.: Development and test of an error model for categorical data. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 6, 87–10 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heuvelink, G.B.M.: Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS. Taylor & Francis, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heuvelink, G.B.M., Burrough, P.A. (eds.) Developments in Statistical Approaches to Spatial Uncertainty and its Propagation. Themed issue Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 16, number 2 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Spatial Accuracy Research Association. http://www.spatial-accuracy.org

  12. Karssenberg, D., De Jong, K.: Dynamic environmental modelling in GIS. 2: Modelling error propagation. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 19, 623–637 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kros, J., Pebesma, E.J., Reinds, G.J., Finke, P.F.: Uncertainty assessment in modelling soil acidification at the European scale: a case study. J. Environ. Qual. 28, 366–377 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kyriakidis, P.C., Dungan, J.L.: A geostatistical approach for mapping thematic classification accuracy and evaluating the impact of inaccurate spatial data on ecological model predictions. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 8, 311–330 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J., Rhind, D.W.: Geographic Information Systems and Science, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miehle, P., Livesley, S.J., C.S. Li, Feikema, P.M., Adams, M.A., Arndt, S.K.: Quantifying uncertainty from large-scale model predictions of forest carbon dynamics. Global Change Biol. 12, 1421–1434 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi, W., Liu, W.B.: A stochastic process-based model for the positional error of line segments in GIS. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 14, 51–66 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi, W., Fisher, P.F., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.): Spatial Data Quality. Taylor & Francis, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math. Geo. 34, 1–21 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Oijen, M., Rougier, J., Smith, R.: Bayesian calibration of process-based forest models: bridging the gap between models and data. Tree Physiol. 25, 915–927 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wickham, J.D., Stehman, S.V., Smith, J.H., Yang, L.: Thematic accuracy of the 1992 National Land-Cover Data for the western United States. R. Sens. Environ. 91, 452–468 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, J.X., Goodchild, M.F.: Uncertainty in Geographic Information. Taylor & Francis, New York (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag

About this entry

Cite this entry

Heuvelink, G., Brown, J. (2008). Uncertain Environmental Variables in GIS. In: Shekhar, S., Xiong, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of GIS. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1_1422

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics